nagoya wrote:
like, people are saying "how can you be so insensitive, he was attacked!"
no, people. just no.
It's crazy that anyone was dumb enough to believe it in the first place. Literally all hate crimes against, blacks, hispanics, Asians, Jews, and so on are fake, just do some online research. Usually it's some mental case doing it for attention or because of self hate.
Not Tupac wrote:
Hoax multiplier effect wrote:
Jussie Smollett might have gotten the idea to stage his own attack after Lee Daniels talked about his cousin getting assaulted because he's gay ... at least that's what some members of the "Empire" cast think.
Some cast members think Jussie's gears started grinding in his head days after Lee posted a video on Instagram on January 10 calling out homophobia. In that same post, the "Empire" creator captioned it, "This past week my cousin was beat up for being gay and I am sick of hearing these stories."
In the world of victimhood: Grindr date goes bad ==> "beat[en] up for being gay"
Every time these stories come up, the LGBTQ world tries to hide a simple fact: the "gay" world has two rather distinct groups, toppers and bottomers (or whatever your bat/bowl terminology is). Swopping it up is sorta rare (maybe 10%? -- though a hierarchic phenomenon of age/prestige exists too). Some don't even consider themselves "gay" unless they are penetrated (males-who-have-sex-with-males MSM). Those who are "victims" are again tend to be in one of the two groups, and not much the other. Go figure?[/quote]
Is this really true? I would have thought in relationships they'd take turns!
Grow Up. You Haters wrote:
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/glanton/ct-met-dahleen-glanton-jussie-smollett-apology-20190221-story.html
"Just because one person lied..."
This woman is exactly the problem. As noted in this thread, the level of hoax hate crimes is off the charts.
Parody is tough these days wrote:
https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1099003130073751552
I don't know who she is, but she is nuts and I doubt too many people agree with her view. Smollett F-ing lied to the police and should be fired.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
I don't know who she is, but she is nuts and I doubt too many people agree with her view. Smollett F-ing lied to the police and should be fired.
She's actually parodying the liberals. In another tweet she says something like, "We HAVE to believe Jussie Smollet as if we don't other people who haven't been attacked won't come forward".
Activist. Healer. Radical intersectionalist poet. Selfless and brave. Pre-order my book.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Parody is tough these days wrote:
https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1099003130073751552I don't know who she is, but she is nuts and I doubt too many people agree with her view. Smollett F-ing lied to the police and should be fired.
You miss the punchline often, eh?
Titania McGrath wrote:
Activist. Healer. Radical intersectionalist poet. Selfless and brave. Pre-order my book.
In Woke, Titania McGrath demonstrates how everybody can play their part in the pursuit of social justice. As a millennial icon on the forefront of online activism, Titania is uniquely placed to guide her readers through the often bewildering array of terminology and concepts that constitute twenty-first-century 'wokeness'. These new ideas often leave the general public bemused, particularly if they don't read the Guardian.
Being woke is actually much easier than people think. As Titania demonstrates, anyone can be an activist. By simply adding a rainbow flag to your Facebook profile, or calling out an elderly person who doesn't understand what 'non-binary' means, you can change the world for the better. Indeed, social media has now made it possible to show how virtuous you are without having to do anything at all.
Timely and indispensable, Titania's step-by-step guide will help you to become the woke person you need to be in an increasingly progressive world. In a non-patronising manner, Titania will explain why you are wrong about everything and how to become more like her.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Woke-Social-Justice-Titania-McGrath/dp/1472130847On Saturday, "Empire" star Terrence Howard shared a video on Instagram in which co-star Jussie Smollett holds and plays with a baby on what appears to be a private jet. In the video, Smollett tickles the child, asks how many teeth he has, and calls him a "sweet baby."
... that's the only Jussie I know. The Jussie I know could never even conceive of something so unconscious and ugly. His innocence or judgment is not for any of us to decide. Stay in your lane and my lane is empathy and love and compassion for someone I've called my son for five years. It's God's job to judge and it's ours to love and hope, especially for those that we claim to have loved.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/24/entertainment/jussie-smollett-terrence-howard-speaks/index.html
Now do you get it? wrote:
Titania McGrath wrote:
Activist. Healer. Radical intersectionalist poet. Selfless and brave. Pre-order my book.
In Woke, Titania McGrath demonstrates how everybody can play their part in the pursuit of social justice. As a millennial icon on the forefront of online activism, Titania is uniquely placed to guide her readers through the often bewildering array of terminology and concepts that constitute twenty-first-century 'wokeness'. These new ideas often leave the general public bemused, particularly if they don't read the Guardian.
Being woke is actually much easier than people think. As Titania demonstrates, anyone can be an activist. By simply adding a rainbow flag to your Facebook profile, or calling out an elderly person who doesn't understand what 'non-binary' means, you can change the world for the better. Indeed, social media has now made it possible to show how virtuous you are without having to do anything at all.
Timely and indispensable, Titania's step-by-step guide will help you to become the woke person you need to be in an increasingly progressive world. In a non-patronising manner, Titania will explain why you are wrong about everything and how to become more like her.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Woke-Social-Justice-Titania-McGrath/dp/1472130847
In all fairness, we're living in a time where people can say sh*t like what she tweeted and be 100% serious about it. What a time to be alive.
Mebbe you ought to re-read wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Did I state that OJ was stabbed? No. I did not. Whomever fought Goldstein was in a heck of a fight.
First I have heard anyone claim this.
So I researched it. And found absolutely nothing to support your assertion.
Can you provide any documentation that "Whomever fought Goldstein was in a heck of a fight."? And, if you said OJ's blood was at the crime scene, then why use the term "whomever"?
I did find this: "Blood stains were found in O.J. Simpson's white Bronco, on a pair of socks in his bedroom, on the pair of gloves, at the crime scene, in O.J. Simpson's driveway and in his house." The only blood at the scene of the crime that belonged to OJ were on the gloves, which were quite possibly planted by Furman (who admitted to planting evidence previously and took the fifth on this one).
It weakens your argument when you call Goldman "Goldstein". Simpson was bigger, had a knife and Goldman was cornered so I don't believe it was much of a fight.
Try going back and re-reading the exchange. I was responding to "Fighter of Goldstein". He called Goldman Goldstein,
When someone is stabbing someone the knife becomes slippery and often causes cuts. This happened to Simpson and his blood was found on the ground.
How does a slippery knife stabbing Goldman and Nicole cause OJ to be cut? How do you know this happened? You claim his blood was found on the ground. I already posted the facts that "Blood stains were found in O.J. Simpson's white Bronco, on a pair of socks in his bedroom, on the pair of gloves, at the crime scene, in O.J. Simpson's driveway and in his house." Nothing about on the ground
Fuhrman was advised to take the fifth by his attorneys if asked whether his previous testimony was a lie when he claimed he hadn't used the N-word in the previous 10 years. Once he used the fifth he had to use it for any other questions as well.
He is a known liar who previously had planted evidence at crime scenes. Not sure why you think this makes him credible.
The first officers to arrive at the crime scene testified there was only one glove. For Fuhrman to have had possession of the glove he would have had to somehow beat everyone to the crime scene or have been the actual murderer.
You just made that up.
He was cut at the crime scene so it doesn't matter how he did it. His blood was at the crime scene near the bloody footprint.
There is no record that Furhman ever planted evidence at a crime scene. He claimed he did so in the N-word tapes and that he and others violently assaulted potential suspects. Because of the tapes his police record was scrutinized and no collaboration was found for either claim. His partners said that he always acted in a professional manner.
I made up how it was impossible for Furhman to have possession of the glove? He would have to be the first to arrive at the scene, the first people to arrive lied about there being only one glove and met him somewhere or he was the murderer. How do you think he had the glove? And as I said before, he would had to know OJ had no alibi before he could plant it.
You might not have around then or when OJ was playing, but he was extremely popular. There was no motivation to frame him. Even the prosecutor, Marcia Clark, said in court that she wished it had been someone else.
Christen Courtney wrote:
Not Tupac wrote:
Every time these stories come up, the LGBTQ world tries to hide a simple fact: the "gay" world has two rather distinct groups, toppers and bottomers (or whatever your bat/bowl terminology is). Swopping it up is sorta rare (maybe 10%? -- though a hierarchic phenomenon of age/prestige exists too). Some don't even consider themselves "gay" unless they are penetrated (males-who-have-sex-with-males MSM). Those who are "victims" are again tend to be in one of the two groups, and not much the other. Go figure?
Is this really true? I would have thought in relationships they'd take turns!
That really isn't the most common case. Particularly in the classical "gay" world (e.g., men who party 50 weekends a year, with 500-odd sexual partners per annum), the subclasses tend to be quite distinct. But in more "stable" homosex relations the percentage of swoppers would certainly be higher. (I wouldn't know about the lesbian situation so much , but again there's a number of subgenres)
[quote]SDSU Aztec wrote:
He was cut at the crime scene so it doesn't matter how he did it.
It does matter. If you cannot explain how he was cut at the scene then your narrative is false.
There is no record that Furhman ever planted evidence at a crime scene.
Fuhrman admitted to having planted evidence at other crime scenes. He took the fifth in this one.
I made up how it was impossible for Furhman to have possession of the glove?
You made up lots of stuff.
Terrence Howard had a complete meltdown on the set of "Empire" after Jussie Smollett was arrested for allegedly staging his "attack."
Sources on the "Empire" set tell TMZ ... Thursday was a complete disaster on set after Jussie turned himself into Chicago Police. Terrence was so upset he refused to come out of his trailer for most of the day.
A source close to Terrence tell us ... the actor didn't believe Jussie's account from the get-go, he felt the story never added up. We're told Terrence grilled Jussie periodically as holes began to emerge.
Tensions between Terrence and Jussie boiled over after the 2 Nigerian-American brothers who allegedly helped Jussie stage the attack, Abel and Ola Osundario, were detained by police ... we're told Terrence confronted Jussie once again, screaming at him to come clean.
Further illustrating his disdain for Jussie ... we're told Terrence was nowhere to be found Thursday night when Jussie addressed the cast and crew.
Terrence was not alone in his feelings ... we're told many others on the cast and crew felt Jussie was lying and ultimately that's why producers decided to remove Jussie from the set for the final 2 episodes ... it was just too disruptive.
LGBT activist 'burned down his own home because he was annoyed there was no prejudice to campaign against'
This is Horrible! USA people are not committing enough Hate Crimes against LGTBQ, and are Literally FORCING them to make Hoaxes themselves. Doesn't everyone have a Right to be Victim?
Teasing More Evidence wrote:
FULL @ABC NEWS EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Chicago police Superintendent speaks with @RobinRoberts about the Jussie Smollett investigation.
“There’s a lot more evidence that hasn’t been presented yet,” Johnson told Roberts, “that does not support the version that he gave.”
Typical Pig Tactic. Try to get the innocent to plea.