Joshua Cheptegei is SUSPICIOUS

rekrunner wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

There is the CAS decision and Houlihan's excuses. So what side of the story is missing?

I haven't seen the CAS side.

Both have been extensively reported - yet you think you know Houlihan's side only - likewise from media reports. That is an impressive feat of ignorance. Or partiality. You surpass yourself.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Both have been extensively reported - yet you think you know Houlihan's side only - likewise from media reports. That is an impressive feat of ignorance. Or partiality. You surpass yourself.

Once again, for the sake provoking an argument, you fabricate things not said, and argue with yourself against your fabrications. And for some strange reason, you direct your argument at me. I'm the puzzled bystander watching the town drunk shouting to himself at everyone, and no one.

Meanwhile...

I did not say what I think.

I did not say what I know.

I only said what I had seen, at the time I said it.

Equally important is what I had not seen.

I was repeatedly accused of believing Houlihan's story, despite having said nothing.

I was surprised to wake up to comments about what I believed -- I guess from those who feel like they've lost every argument so far, so they need to provoke new ones against scarecrows.

I notice again, with amusement, this irrational need to focus on what I "believe".

Choosing who to believe, without first collecting facts, is the game of sheeple.

Widely reporting something doesn't mean the reports are factual.

This is especially true with emotionally charged topics like doping, where many intellectually insecure "fans" of doping are desperate to confirm their as yet unsubstantiated beliefs that the only winners are those who lose to dopers.

rekrunner wrote:

Once again, for the sake provoking an argument, you fabricate things not said, and argue with yourself against your fabrications. And for some strange reason, you direct your argument at me.

Normal for Armstrong.

xzyztxyzt wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

Once again, for the sake provoking an argument, you fabricate things not said, and argue with yourself against your fabrications. And for some strange reason, you direct your argument at me.

Normal for Armstrong.

+1

"Meanwhile...

I did not say what I think.

I did not say what I know.

I only said what I had seen, at the time I said it.

Equally important is what I had not seen. But most important is that I have no idea what I am saying."(quote)

xzyztxyzt wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

Once again, for the sake provoking an argument, you fabricate things not said, and argue with yourself against your fabrications. And for some strange reason, you direct your argument at me.

Normal for Armstrong.

Normal is definitely not rekrunner. Or you.

Thete is a $1000 reward for anyone who can find an answer in there to the question of whether rekrunner buys Houlihan's story.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Thete is a $1000 reward for anyone who can find an answer in there to the question of whether rekrunner buys Houlihan's story.

Your money is safe.

I still haven't seen CAS's side of the story.

rekrunner wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Thete is a $1000 reward for anyone who can find an answer in there to the question of whether rekrunner buys Houlihan's story.

Your money is safe.

I still haven't seen CAS's side of the story.

You never will. You never do.

Armstronglivs wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

I still haven't seen CAS's side of the story.

You never will. You never do.

I just looked and they promised to publish it shortly.

The irony is that I will read it, and you won't.

rekrunner wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You never will. You never do.

I just looked and they promised to publish it shortly.

The irony is that I will read it, and you won't.

LOL +1

rekrunner wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You never will. You never do.

I just looked and they promised to publish it shortly.

The irony is that I will read it, and you won't.

Hard to believe that people like Armstrong could reach such a high age at all. Normally you should expect someone of his intellect to die at every road je wants to cross

rewqgrb wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

I just looked and they promised to publish it shortly.

The irony is that I will read it, and you won't.

LOL +1

But your understanding is it out of the question. That is the irony.

xthzui wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

I just looked and they promised to publish it shortly.

The irony is that I will read it, and you won't.

Hard to believe that people like Armstrong could reach such a high age at all. Normally you should expect someone of his intellect to die at every road je wants to cross

There is a lot that will remain beyond your capacity to understand.

rekrunner wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

You never will. You never do.

I just looked and they promised to publish it shortly.

The irony is that I will read it, and you won't.

Yet the rest of the world already knows well that Houlihan has been found guilty of a doping violation and why - except for you in your basement.

Ignore rekrunner. They've been on the boards for years supporting dopers.

Armstronglivs wrote:

rewqgrb wrote:

LOL +1

But your understanding is it out of the question. That is the irony.

In English, please.

Armstronglivs wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

I just looked and they promised to publish it shortly.

The irony is that I will read it, and you won't.

Yet the rest of the world already knows well that Houlihan has been found guilty of a doping violation and why - except for you in your basement.

That was never the question. You've switched goalposts. Again.

Waitforit4 wrote:

Ignore rekrunner. They've been on the boards for years supporting dopers.

I don't support dopers, and haven't ever.

I support science and logic and evidence and clean athletes and clean athletics.