Sir Lancelot wrote:
Lance Armstrong was the most tested athlete ever and never failed a drug test while he was riding.
No $hit genius, no one has ever posted that here.
Sir Lancelot wrote:
Lance Armstrong was the most tested athlete ever and never failed a drug test while he was riding.
No $hit genius, no one has ever posted that here.
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
wejo wrote:Can you email me the thread or what you're talking about?
Well nobody refuted the wikileaks/Podesta emails, I flicked on CNN back in February and they were claiming Trump hung up on Turnbull. Live on the radio Turnbull said this didn't happen, WashPo/CNN claimed their leaked documents showed Comey investigating Trump personally which even Comey refuted. The Fancy Bears TUEs leaks have not been refuted. Snowden/Manning files/leaks were not refuted. The DNC Donna Brasile emails, not refuted. The Comey leaks to the NY times were not refuted. The L-carnitine/Brown/USADA/Salazar leaks not refuted. The Prince/Blackwater Maldives Russian back channel story (WashPo) was refuted as was the Anthony Scaramucci story (CNN). The Sunday Times blood values sent to Hajo Seppelt were not refuted (and they were an inside job). So it is highly likely this email hack is true. It is likely that Russian cheaters were piled into a separate file. Though people are right to ask questions about this, but it is all in the Maclaren Report anyhow.
I get your point. I think these files are legitimately from IAAF.
I think IAAF did something with Jager's sample that day.
LOL. Check out this reply to his statement!
"Some Badger 21 minutes ago
Things about Evan I know:
from Midwest
has great hair
was a Badger
had threesome with two perfect 10 Swedish athletes
is hung like a god damn horse
doesn't need to dope
End of discussion."
Posted this on the other thread but maybe he looked at the wrong date. In Europe dates are written day/month/year.
2/9/16 could be September 2, 2016. When did the olympics start?
wejo wrote:
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:Well nobody refuted the wikileaks/Podesta emails, I flicked on CNN back in February and they were claiming Trump hung up on Turnbull. Live on the radio Turnbull said this didn't happen, WashPo/CNN claimed their leaked documents showed Comey investigating Trump personally which even Comey refuted. The Fancy Bears TUEs leaks have not been refuted. Snowden/Manning files/leaks were not refuted. The DNC Donna Brasile emails, not refuted. The Comey leaks to the NY times were not refuted. The L-carnitine/Brown/USADA/Salazar leaks not refuted. The Prince/Blackwater Maldives Russian back channel story (WashPo) was refuted as was the Anthony Scaramucci story (CNN). The Sunday Times blood values sent to Hajo Seppelt were not refuted (and they were an inside job). So it is highly likely this email hack is true. It is likely that Russian cheaters were piled into a separate file. Though people are right to ask questions about this, but it is all in the Maclaren Report anyhow.
I get your point. I think these files are legitimately from IAAF.
I think IAAF did something with Jager's sample that day.
Why? Do they look like IAAF files? Do you have experience assessing whether or not files are authentic IAAF files?
I know these files are from fancy bears (on their website). Fancy bears is likely associated with the russian government. That's all I know. I know fancy bears says these are IAAF files, but I have no idea if that's true and no reason to believe its true.
Anyone who takes the time and effort to cheat will certainly take the same time and effort to deny and try to look good with PR relations. Jus sayin
In the leak it says 9/02/2016 so I'm a little confused. The September date would make sense because it would have been right at the end of his season.
Mr. OAR wrote:
In the leak it says 9/02/2016 so I'm a little confused. The September date would make sense because it would have been right at the end of his season.
Look at the ordering. Clearly it is day/month/year. And the other document says (upper-left) Apr 2016.
Yeah I'm an idiot, thanks lol. I looked at the top of the dates, put it together that it was day/month/year, scrolled down and immediately forgot.
There is plenty to talk about in the sport. Can people just focus on that. No need to add in incorrect or misleading statements about politics into this thread. There are thousands of political websites and threads here, A casual aside is ok but we don't need to get into attacking / defending Trump in Jager thread.
Leave politics aout wrote:
There is plenty to talk about in the sport. Can people just focus on that. No need to add in incorrect or misleading statements about politics into this thread. There are thousands of political websites and threads here, A casual aside is ok but we don't need to get into attacking / defending Trump in Jager thread.
I agree. Too many people with Russian conspiracy theories appearing here.
He's a doper. Let's get real. He was beating top Kenyans in Steeplechase of all events. And those Kenyans were likely doping too. He is on the strong stuff concocted by Nike money.
Hagerstown is my hero. There is no reason to think he is doping. None. So he is the only human on earth who can run sub 8 without cheating. He is also the only white English speaker, and it has been proven again and again that white English speakers can do what no other human can do in distance running by out hardering everyone. It's called the American priveledge. Aknoledge
Fakenewslibturdmedia wrote:
Anyone who takes the time and effort to cheat will certainly take the same time and effort to deny and try to look good with PR relations. Jus sayin
What's he supposed to say if he's clean?
If you found someone's medical records on the street, do you feel it would be ok to publish them online?
Doping is a major problem, but throwing anyone/everyone under the bus because maybe this information from an anonymous source might be true isn't even part of the solution. It just muddies the waters and certainly has nothing to do with journalism.
There's a big ick factor in this whole situation.
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
CDA wrote:Yeah, once I saw his name on the list, I had a feeling the list was fake/misleading.
Really, given that he runs with and beats Kenyans that are likely doping. The man must either be Superman or a Superfraud.
Such an idiotic statement. But not surprising given the source.
El Keniano wrote:
Such an idiotic statement. But not surprising given the source.
Chumpy statement from the peanut gallery. 😄. Why don't you articulate what's wrong with his statement...if you're capable. Otherwise, your one liners look kinda chumpy...who could have imagined.
I want to believe him so bad... but being training partners with Solinsky for so long makes its sooo hard.
There is NO away, even ythough I LOVE THE FLOBROS commentating that Payton Jordan 10k... there is no way Solinsky ran 26:59 clean. No way. No one believes it. Nothing he has done backs it up. It just adds fuel to this current Jager Bomb in my mind...
hoogibktkyp wrote:
lance was already world champion by 93
Yes but that was a one day race and totally different than the fitness/abilities needed to win the TDF.
Umm.
The dog ate my homework...,
LRC fave Jager gets nipped.
You say, 'I'll test any time, any day, any way to show you I'm clean'.
Jerry Schumacher is suspect BIG TIME now.
BIG TIME.