Man you liked your "conceptually incarcerated" construct so well that you gave yourself a + as a handle, but that wasn't enough for you, then you had to start a new thread, to give it more attention.As far as your post, I agree with some parts. Yes, appreciate her run, a winning effort at a national championship.Refusing to mention something, obvious to all, such as her being the only white girl in the race AND the first white girl in years to win the 200 seems to me a bit "conceptually incarcerated". Its OK to think it and to say it. No one is offended.Would you feel the same way if it was mentioned that a winning ice racer was black? I am guessing you would not. Conceptually incarcerated, I like the construct.
+ wrote:
Here we go again.
Pointing out that she is white buys into self defeating stereo types.
Appreciate her run for what it was. A winning effort at a national championship. That is plenty significant.
Everytime someone notes the fastest white sprinter or first non-African under 27:00 in the 10,000m, etc, etc, etc, they are buying into stereo types that limit them. They are conceptually incarcerated.
Great champions don't spent *any* time thinking about or looking at lists or rankings of where they stand based on their race. The believe they can compete with everyone. Raced based performance comparisons are trivial at best, and at worst, serve to continue to divide us human beings.