Sage doesn't agree. He thinks you are the least informed poster on these boards when it comes to doping. He's right.
Hard to say what Sage thinks it is that I don't know -- he wasn't very specific about which information is lacking.
I have a lot of information about historical running performances.
He was totally specific. He said you are the least informed poster on the board. That means you are an ignorant tw*t. Only you have trouble understanding what that means.
Hard to say what Sage thinks it is that I don't know -- he wasn't very specific about which information is lacking.
I have a lot of information about historical running performances.
He was totally specific. He said you are the least informed poster on the board. That means you are an ignorant tw*t. Only you have trouble understanding what that means.
If he was specific, what is it that he said that I don't know, that other posters would? Please respond with concrete specificity. Only then can it possibly be refuted and demonstrated false. I do have some information, and I do lack other information, so he could be right, or could be wrong. No way to tell until he adds clarification.
He didn't say I was "the least" informed, but that I was "among" the least informed. In these threads, I can often be found among posters like you.
He gave his own personal opinion without providing any clarity or basis or information. If you know me by now, I have a long history of not caring about anyone's baseless opinions, nor their names, nor do I assume their expertise, but I am only interested in the bases that support such proposed hypotheses. You are the opposite, you care about their names and you simply assume relevant and competent expertise like an obedient and ignorant follower, without any genuine understanding.
He was totally specific. He said you are the least informed poster on the board. That means you are an ignorant tw*t. Only you have trouble understanding what that means.
If he was specific, what is it that he said that I don't know, that other posters would? Please respond with concrete specificity. Only then can it possibly be refuted and demonstrated false. I do have some information, and I do lack other information, so he could be right, or could be wrong. No way to tell until he adds clarification.
He didn't say I was "the least" informed, but that I was "among" the least informed. In these threads, I can often be found among posters like you.
He gave his own personal opinion without providing any clarity or basis or information. If you know me by now, I have a long history of not caring about anyone's baseless opinions, nor their names, nor do I assume their expertise, but I am only interested in the bases that support such proposed hypotheses. You are the opposite, you care about their names and you simply assume relevant and competent expertise like an obedient and ignorant follower, without any genuine understanding.
24 min 5K here (but I live at altitude - 4500ft). Could I take home the glory this fall at the local Turkey Trot if I incorporate EPO into my training?
If he was specific, what is it that he said that I don't know, that other posters would? Please respond with concrete specificity. Only then can it possibly be refuted and demonstrated false. I do have some information, and I do lack other information, so he could be right, or could be wrong. No way to tell until he adds clarification.
He didn't say I was "the least" informed, but that I was "among" the least informed. In these threads, I can often be found among posters like you.
He gave his own personal opinion without providing any clarity or basis or information. If you know me by now, I have a long history of not caring about anyone's baseless opinions, nor their names, nor do I assume their expertise, but I am only interested in the bases that support such proposed hypotheses. You are the opposite, you care about their names and you simply assume relevant and competent expertise like an obedient and ignorant follower, without any genuine understanding.
He's really rattled you. And rightly.
I see you are not able to find anything specific either.
I see you are not able to find anything specific either.
The specific point, after pages of this thread, is that he thinks you are an ignoramus. That isn't specific enough for you? He isn't talking about anyone else. He says you are the least informed poster on the thread. That's you - no one else. What he hasn't done is give chapter and verse as to why he thinks that. I'm sure he could but it is unnecessary - his view is unmistakable and is obviously correct. You have proved him right time and again. Of course you don't accept it but so what? Trump doesn't accept what others say about him either but it's still true.
I see you are not able to find anything specific either.
The specific point, after pages of this thread, is that he thinks you are an ignoramus. That isn't specific enough for you? He isn't talking about anyone else. He says you are the least informed poster on the thread. That's you - no one else. What he hasn't done is give chapter and verse as to why he thinks that. I'm sure he could but it is unnecessary - his view is unmistakable and is obviously correct. You have proved him right time and again. Of course you don't accept it but so what? Trump doesn't accept what others say about him either but it's still true.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and beliefs, but he wasn't very specific about which information or knowledge he believes I don't have, that others do.