Californian wrote:
2)Hypothesizing is in fact making an educated guess, using what little information you know. That is exactly what I did in your case.
Your guess betrayed an utter lack of education. Try again.
3)I don't deem people who disagree with me immature. I deem people who call others morons in a blanket statement at the beginning of a thread immature. And, in fact, you were calling people morons who disgreeded with your belief that Wetmore is a great coach.
Your inability to process the information you read borders on the astonishing. Read again and then maybe you will have a point.
4)Actually, you don't need to drive along in a little scooter to tell people to slow down. You need to build their trust so that they listen to you when you tell them take it easy on recovery days. You need to show authority so that the runners know their will be consequences for pushing easy days too hard. And coaches can easily tell when their runners have been hammering too much on the easy days.
Again, wrong. "Consequences" for hammering easy runs? What's he going to do, spank them? Ground them? Grow up. Wetmore coaches a group of dedicated athletes. They will hammer regardless of their trust in the coach or not.
Reference Warhurt's group in Lear's other book. Brannen, Sullivan, Webb, McMullen all injured at one point during the book. I do not see the level of hate directed towards Warhurst that is directed towards Wetmore.
5)The last statement you make further supports the idea that you are extremely immature and incapable of presenting a valid argument without resorting to poor insults.
Care to elaborate? Or will you make more unsupported statements and claim knowledge of another you do not have under the guise of "educated guesses"?
A sad case you make yourself out to be.