otto wrote:
brogan1 wrote:I support lifetime bans but since all the other dopers are welcomed back.I welcome none of them back.
You don't, but many others do in the form of sponsorship and appearance fees.
otto wrote:
brogan1 wrote:I support lifetime bans but since all the other dopers are welcomed back.I welcome none of them back.
You don't, but many others do in the form of sponsorship and appearance fees.
Thomas Frazer and Mick Chohisey got under initial Olympic B Standard of 2:18 in Rotterdam with high 2:17s. Ireland usually only takes A standards. Kenneally was only Irish Marathoner in 2012 and Fagan the same in 2008 both off 2:14s. If Fagan clocks a 2:15 it would set him up well. Paul Pollock only one I can envision beating that.
This makes monitoring him fairly simple.. We know he ran that fast time on the juice. Therefore, if he runs that again we will know he's on the juice again. Why even bother with drug tests, just wait and see if he runs fast again.
Any Irish posters have new info on Cragg running another marathon?
Link wrote:
.....I think a better solution is to require that anyone busted for doping be required to donate any future prize money to WADA or whatever anti-doping agency after they've paid back any prize money they won in the past, which would then be redistributed to those who didn't win what they ought to have.
This ^
if martin fagan cannot run under 2:18 he should be barred from every pub in mullingar. what way does the process work? if just one runner gets the A standard is he the only one to go?
Fagan runs the standard and crosses the line in 2.16:09. Faded badly in the second half.