So, in 2012 you spoke about the doping of Kenyan athletes, living in a Southern US city, of course using all your great experience about Kenya.
This is the normal behavior of brainless people, used to look at stereotypes rather than at the reality, that they don't know.
I was in Kenya the first time in 1998, till 2003 with a frequence of two weeks every two months (the group of athletes I followed trained for long time in Italy, in La Mandria Park, so I didn't need to stay in Kenya Always), from 2004 instead I spent about 7-8 months per year in Iten, and till 2012 I NEVER heard some athlete asking for some supplement, also legal.
In 2012, I started to hear the first requests of supplements, because the athletes, going around the world, learnt from some white athlete the use of "LEGAL" supplements, thinking they can help their performances.
In 2012, for the first time we understood something illegal was going on. I remember one training session in Chepkoilel track (between Eldoret and Iten) together with the group of Patrick Sang, when he told me that three days before, during a HM in Baringo, an unknown man approached him asking "Are you a coach ?" (this means that man had nothing to do with athletics, since Patrick is the most known coach in Kenya….) and telling him that could give some medicine able to enhance the performances of the athletes. Of course Patrick treated the man (Kenyan and not a foreigner) in bad way, because Always we teached ethic principles to our athletes.
Few days later, maybe two weeks before the first documentary of Seppelt in ARD, I went Nairobi for meeting the chairman, Isaiah Kiplagat, and I explained that something started to change in the behavior of many athletes in Kenya. At that times, I was not worry about the top athletes, followed by coaches who were also "Teachers of life" (like Patrick himself, or Brother Colm), but about the big number of athletes of medium-high level, who didn't have any control, and could be easily cheated by fake doctors / coaches / physios.
Athletic Kenya, at that time, didn't do anything : Isaiah told me "this is not something for mzungus, let us solve the problem", but the solution was only to deny, because nothing changed.
This doesn't mean all the best athletes started to dope. I personally, such as Brother Colm and Patrick, continued to produce top results (world records, olympic and world Champions) with clean athletes, Always under control, who didn't want to cheat themselves. Yes, because the strongest athletes wanted to show themselves, before to other people, that they were the number one using only their strength, their talent and their motivation.
I'm well aware that there is doping in Kenya, but I refuse the idea that is generalised. In many cases (not when we speak of EPO) the positivity is because there is a small percentage of steroids in normal medicines, used for flu, cough, typhus, or other frequent african diseases.
But when we speak of EPO (not Biological Passport), there is no possibility of error : the only way for the assumption is to inject, and I don't think this can happen without the knowledge of the subject…
So, your idea that "the majority of Kenyans" was on the juice, and you say that
"the reason for training camps/groups of elite runners and how it's not just for the purpose of running together, or with other fast runners, or so that coaches can be around all their athletes at once. Training groups allow for doctors to be able to administer drugs to the athletes and be able to monitor their vitals, since doping is extremely dangerous. Plus, the doping needs to be controlled so the athletes don't test positive (but that's another subject)…
you are really ridiculous, thinking the organisation in Kenya can be similar to the organisation of the group of Lance Armstrong. Where are the doctors able to administer drugs in Kenya and able to monitor their vitals ? Who has the facilities for controlling that, assuming doping, the athletes don't test positive ?
Speaking about something you don't know, you can't give any interesting contribution to any argument. It's a good rule to be quite, when you don't know the truth, instead speaking for showing other people that you are inside a world that, instead, is totally unknown for you.