Duane Alex Johnson Peterburg S wrote:
I would refuse to live in New York (LI and it's horrible NJ suburbs and NY suburbs included), Northern Virginia, D.C., the Main Line, DelCo, Southern California, Minnesota, Most of the MidWest (except Kansas), Mass., Boulder, Southern Florida, Georgia, New Orleans, Eugene, and anything on the Great Lakes (except maybe in the summer)
i think you read the question wrong. seriously those are mostly nice places
P.Whelan wrote:
Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia. That is about it, I would live just about anywhere else, I just know I wouldn't fit in well in these states.
And we'd rape your @$$ purdy boy if you ever did move here.
The Wrath of Ricky Rudd wrote:
Oklahoma
Bite Me ! Louisianna !
Firefly: The places are fine, it's the people who reside there which are problematic. I like nice people, not just nice places. I want to go out the door and have people wave and me and be kind. It's not a ton to ask for. Hence, why these places, which I have spent time are not on the top of my list. Granted, each of these places has very nice people. It is just the majority of the the population which is unkind. Hopefully each of these places will change! The midwest, of course is nice, but it just scares me due to the the fact that it is not near oceans, mountains or much else. The people there are pretty wonderful.
PHILADELPHIA.
NEW YORK!
haha YO wrote:
Basically all of the west coast.
Its were Satan lives.
Seriously all the Mexican gangs, thug blacks, Earthquakes, racist Asian immigrants (My family founded America not yours buck toof rice sucker), oh and the Yuppies that allowed the entire West Coast to be polluted with this garbage.
The West Coast is overdue for a 9.0 EQ. San Francisco was built directly on a fault line. In 10 years LA will be over run with Latin Gangs, seriously the West Coast is hell on earth.
midwest, southeast, LA and NYC
The bit between Canada and Mexico.
Atlanta, Cincinatti, Newark, Washington D.C., Kansas City, Dayton, Hartford, New Haven, Buffalo, Baton Rouge, Little Rock, Jackson, New Orleans, Memphis, Baltimore, Birmingham, Gary, Compton, Cleveland, Richmond, Oakland, Flint, Detroit, Camden, St. Louis
No quiero cold unless they have jobs there that we can take from you gabachos
Great troll!! Pick a topic that would promote dissension and sit back and watch the fun.
Personally "under any circumstances" is pretty severe so I would live anywhere in the US under some circumstances.
For instance, Move here to receive the medical treatment to save your child's life.
Would you then say, "No, I wouldn't live there under any circumstances"
Anyone that refuses to live in texas is a pussy. Texas is the greatest state in the country.
I would not live anywhere in USA. Visit, yes, but live there with the fat, bible thumping, football loving, beer swilling, 'we're number one' yelling obese monolingual jingos? Never.
I live in North Carolina. I love this state. At times I miss a big city, but we aren't too far from Washington DC.
I cannot figure out why some of you people are listing DC though, DC is a great town. It has everything.
I hate cold. I hate wet. I hate pollen. I hate humidity.
There's no life north of Santa Barbara nor east of Las Vegas.
You don't have to be rich to live in So Cal. i live in Temecula. It's heaven compared to the sucky PacNW where I grew up watching grandmas inject babies with heroin and lick up meth.
Newark, NJ. My God, what a hell hole. And Detroit. How people live in shit-holes like these amazes me.
'Under any circumstance' is a little extreme, but wouldnt want to live on the east coast or southeast. Also Wyoming, Oklahoma, Kansas, North Dakota, Hawaii and Utah.
I'll second that one.
Anthony Crudale
Just Being Honest wrote:
Honestly, I wouldn't live in a place that has too many of "the wrong kind of people".
and I think you all know what I mean by that...
Im just saying.
We all know what kind of people you mean without spelling it out. ;) Too many places have way too many of them ...