rojo wrote:
Any thoughts on why this is the case?
Vigorous walking was linked to the largest reduction in risk of early death (17 per cent), followed by running (13 per cent), climbing stairs (10 per cent) and resistance training (9 per cent). Swimming didn’t show a measurable benefit in this dataset—possibly because “swimming” can mean anything from floating around to hard laps.
I do both!
JustMe22 wrote:
Remember when Queen was asked to write the score for that epic film, "Flash Gordon?" They not only nailed it, but they raised a really relevant musical question:
I, for one, am jealous of Brian May's luxurious full head of hair! But, that is beside the point. Why do we treat everything as if it has to be optimal, when even less-than-optimal results are good?
Exercising in any way for any amount of time will give you health benefits. Period.
Well, look at the time...already shared my opinion in the most obnoxious way imaginable. Guess it's time to move onto other things...
Think you’ll find that “Who Wants To Live Forever” was from the film “Highlander”, not “Flash Gordon”.
Who wants to live forever?
I do. Just think of all the things you could do, places to visit, people to meet.
And if you felt like being lazy, you could have the day off.