How Cole Hocker is Quietly Getting into WR Shape, and Why Nobody is Noticing

Armstronglivs wrote:

77777 wrote:

Do you have a problem with people liking a runner?

So you don't differ with the point I made? To that, "liking" a runner is irrelevant - unless it blinds you to the obvious. As it obviously does you.

Armstronglivs wrote:

77777 wrote:

You are too thick to understand "peaking".

Not as obtuse as someone who doesn't understand doping.

77777 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So you don't differ with the point I made? To that, "liking" a runner is irrelevant - unless it blinds you to the obvious. As it obviously does you.

It's only obvious to you. Imagine thread after thread ruined by a moron accusing Snell and Walker of doping. Accusing Lydiard of having found out about a new doping method.

You lack self-awareness. You are a miserable old kunt who can't stand the fact that younger people enjoy the sport you now hate.

Armstronglivs wrote:

77777 wrote:

It's only obvious to you. Imagine thread after thread ruined by a moron accusing Snell and Walker of doping. Accusing Lydiard of having found out about a new doping method.

You lack self-awareness. You are a miserable old kunt who can't stand the fact that younger people enjoy the sport you now hate.

Nothing stops you from enjoying your doped sport.

77777 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Not as obtuse as someone who doesn't understand doping.

You don't understand peaking and you don't understand doping. "Obtuse" should be your handle here.

77777 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

Nothing stops you from enjoying your doped sport.

I am involved in the sport. I know dopers, I know those who don't dope. You are just a miserable old loser.

Armstronglivs wrote:

JackmanJones wrote:

He does. He hates literally every active professional runner. I have gotten him to say this explicitly in the past.

You have gotten me to say nothing. I have said that doping is throughout the sport and especially the top.

asdsadsadas wrote:

"How Cole Hocker is Quietly Getting into WR Shape" doesn't require 1500 words. It requires 2: Nike drugs.

Armstronglivs wrote:

77777 wrote:

You don't understand peaking and you don't understand doping. "Obtuse" should be your handle here.

If there were entrance exams required in order to post here you would fail them every time.

asdsadsadas wrote:

"How Cole Hocker is Quietly Getting into WR Shape" doesn't require 1500 words. It requires 2: Nike drugs.

77777 wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

If there were entrance exams required in order to post here you would fail them every time.

You have nothing.

Armstronglivs wrote:

77777 wrote:

I am involved in the sport. I know dopers, I know those who don't dope. You are just a miserable old loser.

If you know who is doping and who isn't you are better informed than WADA. As I said, keep enjoying your doped sport.

Armstronglivs wrote:

asdsadsadas wrote:

"How Cole Hocker is Quietly Getting into WR Shape" doesn't require 1500 words. It requires 2: Nike drugs.

Careful. You will incur the ire of those who can't cope with that.