Why are the mods butchering this thread? I posted that sports would be one of the professions that AI wouldn't replace, because people will always want to watch real sportsmen and women competing. WTF is wrong with that? You'd think that would be quite relevant to this forum. Bill Gates and dozens of other industry leaders think that virtually all jobs will be gone in just 5 or 10 years time, but they also virtual all agree that professional sports will still thrive. Jeez, the mods can be such imbeciles sometimes.
As our culture decays and jobs are automated and replaced, the one industry which will flourish is ENTERTAINMENT
As our society decays and jobs are lost to automation and AI, the one industry which will flourish is ENTERTAINMENT. Which will become more and more extreme
bro what does "coders" even mean? does that mean "software engineers" or does it mean any job that involves coding? as you know more and more jobs are adding coding to the skill kit of the profession. half of finance involves coding now.
Bill Gates is proof that having lots of money does not in anyway make you smart... it's likely a better indicator of being lucky. Here's a guy that's supposed to be some kind of software genius that left Microsoft and sold a big chunk of his shares to invest elsewhere. If he had just kept his 11.2 million shares at IPO time, he'd be worth $1.648 Trillion, which is 15x his current net worth. And before you say he's giving all his money away to charity now, don't forget he famously massively shorted tesla - completely contrary to his green virtues and invested heavily in vaccine stocks before using his foundation to heavily influence the WHO and governments to force vaccinate - all to make money. Dumb move after dumb move after dumb move. That's Gates. And, he's a pedo.
My career was in hi-end automation for projects in life sciences, automotive, energy, etc. . Robots are great, but they truly can't think or act like a human. We had our grandchildren over for the weekend recently. Ages 2-7. They were at times running amok and torquing around the house or outside. No way could a robot even handle little kids without spraying something like tear gas on them. The robot would have a overheating problem and shut down.
I would wager my life savings that the world’s oldest profession will survive.
lol you think you’re clever. But you are wrong. Sex robots have taken over already. 1- more women use vibrator than man
2- more men than ever watch a illusion on a mirror and use a automatic fleshlight
With any linear growth, sex robots will be taking over by 2100. Not even a question. It begs the question “what is sex?” It’s not that human to human sex will go away just that it will always be mediated in the future by an Ai surrogate. for example, say by 2300 it will be extremely odd and unheeded of and almost incomprehensible for someone to have sex with another human. The Ai is creating a literally ontological set/layer between the self and “other” it happened with language, the Ai is just the next one.
its unheard of to have sex with someone and not “speak” to them before or at all. That’s the layer between. But this “ai” we see is the next, so again, maybe even by 2200 having sex without Ai there might be down right dangerous. How do you test? How do you validate or record or stay safe from disease? You see—we will become more anxious and more “technologically” merger. Language and words themselves were like the Ai of 100000 BC ai is that now. For animals, it’s normal to do it and not “talk” but humans unheard of. So it logically follows…what you think of thought of as “sex” isn’t what you think it is.
sex is an open [set] like set theory. It’s not closed. It’s basically moving and changing constantly and there is always aspect you don’t see, so that sound logically ontology—-brings you to the next obvious thing——sex robots are not potential, it’s an inevitable thing. But don’t worry, you never will be there anyways. That’s why it’s perfect, each to their own time. Being is always changing.
also it does seem that masturbation and “sex” are not the same experience. It seems people barely even have sex now, the language castrated us—these “condoms” sold to “protect” you. It’s all ridiculous. People think they are having “sex” and the capitalistic language is literally there in person betweeen you, keeping you apart. The language needs to do this to make sure it overpowers sex.
sex and language and in a battle. Language is logic, it starts with the fantasy (axioms) and then says they don’t exist and it’s pure logic.
sex starts with pure unknowns me fantasy, and then thru that you find the ultimate logic. But both want to be dominate, so they lie and cheat and steal and make love occasionally to the other.
Wow! Sex and language? Logic and language? Bot-transmitted disease. Now “capitalistic language” further contributes to the gumbo of language and lexicon you serve up. Fascinating. I’m going to bail on parsing the post, but it was interesting. You have a rich fantasy life I imagine.
i bought sex toys in the past. I threw them all away, as i mentioned on a thread about illegal dumping of trash in public trash cans, earlier today.
Anything that isn't human will become old - quickly. If AI results in true-to-life girlfriend sex robots, they will inevitably become actual persons who have the right to NOT consent, or to charge for their services. There is no winning with the dopamine treadmill, unfortunately.