You are talking about two different compounds. Nandrolone is far more anabolic than testosterone (11:1 versus 1:1). It is not even close. The reason why there are more positive tests for nandrolone is because it heavily suppresses natural production of testosterone (even more than TRT) and is therefore easier to detect than EPO.
Nandrolonoe & all anabolic steroids for that fact have had some of the methyl group removed from thd 19 carbon ring of the testosterone molecule. This reduces the androgenic properties of testosterone while maintaining the anabolic benefits.
Anabolic = tissue repair & growth while the androgenic aspects = secondary sexual characteristics & undesired side-effects.
Dr John Ziegler aka/"Montana Jack" is credited with the designing of the first anabolic steroid (Dianabol) in the U.S. through CIBA labs in the late 50s. His Olympic caliber athletes (weight lifters & T&F athletes) on synthetic testosterone were experiencing great anabolic results but suffered undesirable androgenic side-effects. Hence, the development of anabolic steroids & the genie was let out of the bottle.
Anabolic steroids raise testosterone levels just like synthetic testosterone does - just with reduced side-effects. And both synthetic testosterone & anabolic steroids suppress natural testosterone levels to zero after about a year's regular use.
Sure, some aging masters runners might be tempted, but most? I'd think that they are actually a bit less likely than the general aging population to use TRT/HRT because it puts a technical restriction on their racing activities. The general population not doing competitions (running, cycling, etc.) don't have that (moral?) consideration and can do it or not purely based on quality-of-life choices.
When you include Dehydroepiandrostone (DHEA) into the mix, I'd say a lot are. Don't forget DHEA is sold as a dietary supplement in the U.S. & costs pennies!
DHEA, like testosterone, declines with age. Dr Dennis Villareal, Baylor College of Medicine, is an authority on DHEA & aging. See his studies on the benefits people over 65 received with DHEA supplementation.
Do any of you remember the McPherson doping case? The over 60 diminutive race walker that tested positive for an anabolic/androgenic compound at the indoor masters championships back in 2017?
He came up a crazy story that he sat on some hand lotion that was tainted on the bleachers at the stadium. 🤣
What happen here is McPherson didn't think he'd get tested being a sole competitor in his race walking event. 😉 I bet he won't make the same mistake twice.
DHEA is sold for pennies for a reason. It doesn't work.
Serum dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) concentrations decrease ~80% between ages 25 and 75 yr. Aging also results in an increase in arterial stiffness, which is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and m...
With advancing age, plasma testosterone levels decline, with free testosterone levels declining more significantly than total testosterone. This fall is thought to underlie the development of physical and mental weakness that...
The plasma levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfated form (DHEAS) decline approximately 80% between the ages of 25 and 75 yr. Muscle mass and strength also decrease with aging. Published data on the effects of...
Your experience is pretty interesting but doesn't seem to follow what is touted in the real world. Heck, Floyd Landis was cycling so much test it was ridiculous and it obviously didn't slow him down. Not doubting your experience, just seems to be an outlier and a curiosity. Too bad we don't have more people that could chime in with real world experience.
Nice AI search. Have you ever actually used either compound? If you did you would know there is a world of difference. Try microdosing Nandrolone and then quitting before competition. You will be a eunuch and feel horrible.
Your experience is pretty interesting but doesn't seem to follow what is touted in the real world. Heck, Floyd Landis was cycling so much test it was ridiculous and it obviously didn't slow him down. Not doubting your experience, just seems to be an outlier and a curiosity. Too bad we don't have more people that could chime in with real world experience.
From what I have seen on TRT forums over the years, my negative cardio experience is not an outlier. Then again, you don't tend to see a lot of distance runners on those forums. Here is another typical comment:
"I’m going on week 4 of 140/mg week (70/70). I have noticed my mile times have gotten much slower. I went from averaging 30 miles/week at 7:30-8:00 paces to running 50 miles/week at 9:00-9:30 paces. Even after taking 3 days off running I’m still running 9:00 paces. I’d attribute it to the ~8 lbs of water weight I’ve put on. They drew some blood this morning so I’m curious to see where my E2 is at."
You are right about cycling. Exo test was/is very pervasive in that sport. However, I think the differentiator may be that the fluid retention from TRT tends to collect in the feet, calves and knees - all killers for distance runners.
As you say, it would be interesting to hear about the experience of other TRT users. I am genuinely curious if others have had opposite experience.
I know some 50 years who're more 'ripped to shreds' than any 20 year olds ive ever met and even with like 50lbs of extra muscle they can run like a 2:35.
But totally clean....
I run and cycle. It is pretty common (I'd guess 20+%) in cycling and pretty visible who is doing it. The 50+ big muscle mass and ripped look is part of it, but the testosterone users are sometimes also really aggressive. They will often admit it and claim "replacement" and say it isn't for performance, but there they are at the local races. That is just their excuse. It is cheating and they know it, we know it.
There really isn't much that can be done. However, one of the aggressive jerks cut a course in a bike race and I called him on it. He yelled profanity at me in an all ages race with teenagers around us. I had my gopro on and showed the race director. He was told to never come back. Small victory.
Nice AI search. Have you ever actually used either compound? If you did you would know there is a world of difference. Try microdosing Nandrolone and then quitting before competition. You will be a eunuch and feel horrible.
I was a national class bodybuilder back in 1980s when anabolic steroids at peak usage before they classified as controlled substances & pushed underground. This was probably before you were even born.
Have you used either compound? And why don't like look up the chemistry of anabolic steroids instead of being such an as*hole punk kid.
USADA is a joke when it comes to catching 40+ runners doping.
They caught Robert Qualls a few years ago , the retired professor was using all kinds of banned peds. What a Joke.
If WADA legalized most of the PEDs after 40 it would be interesting.
I play by the rules as this is my nature. But I can see why many would cheat. Even if stuff like micro dosing epo and trt and human growth hormone and what ever else were legal for old farts I would not take any of them just to run faster.
I do confess to using super shoes!
I know I'll eventually capitulate on the super shoes, but I'm still holding on to some made up set of ideals that are getting sillier with each passing year. I did try them out a few times and laughed at how ridiculously good they feel. Maybe I'll change my mind when I turn 50 next year, and then I can finally go sub 3 for the marathon with a 3:0x current PR. Even that ship has highly likely sailed, though, since it was set 15 years ago.
They felt "ridiculously good" but you're waiting a bit longer to sport them? Do you sleep on a bed of nails but will spring for a temper-pedic later?
Every time the subject here is brought up (every month or so) masters running is mentioned. However, the statements are often made by people who don't participate at those events or even at big road or track races around the country.
I'm a regular on the national masters circuit and do some big-time road races each year (majors and USATF open circuit). Can't speak for the every person runner out there, nor the others on the masters races. Can only speak for myself and can make an educated guess on some of the others.
At the local level, I don't think intentional doping is all that high. There might be some who do hormone therapy for health reasons. It might be interesting to see data on the percent of people in the general population who take something that would be on the WADA list. The running population would probably be reflective of that.
As for those who are highly competitive, consistently racing at national-level races, I don't think it is that common but don't know for sure. Maybe some have TUEs. USADA does test at maybe 50-60% of the races. Not everyone gets tested, but the overall winners and top runners in select age groups are picked. So maybe 10-12 athletes get tested at a given race. There have been just two or three positive tests at national races in the past decade. Some athletes become scarce when it is known that there will be testing (DNS or DNF). A few might be suspicious, when they improve by a huge amount in a short period of time (like the aforementioned Robert Qualls), look extremely buff or lean, or race a lot and just blow records out of the water every time they line up (Kevin Castille some years back). Random testing would be a good deterrent but that would take a lot of resources away from testing at the professional level.
I wonder about gym bros, that's a different culture and maybe it's more prevalent there, but actually you don't see a lot of them at the national races. There is no testing of the masses (including age group runners) at major road races, except when there is prize money. Have never heard of a positive test for a prize-winning (typically former or current elites) masters runner at a race like NYC, Boston, Chicago, Peachtree etc.
That would also be my impression. I've done USATF Masters and World Senior Games a few times, and made the top three in USATF four times and have scraped onto the world rankings a few times.
Given where I was competitively as an open runner, and where I am now, I doubt many of my rivals are on peds. I think also there are some masters that have the fortunate combination of above average talent and aging more slowly than their cohort, and they become the real outliers.
Nice AI search. Have you ever actually used either compound? If you did you would know there is a world of difference. Try microdosing Nandrolone and then quitting before competition. You will be a eunuch and feel horrible.
I was a national class bodybuilder back in 1980s when anabolic steroids at peak usage before they classified as controlled substances & pushed underground. This was probably before you were even born.
Have you used either compound? And why don't like look up the chemistry of anabolic steroids instead of being such an as*hole punk kid.
So nasty lol. You obviously haven't read through the thread where I talk about TRT experience. That was the entire point - to hear from distance runners who have tried TRT.
The question remains, how did your use of testosterone affect your cardio as a distance runner?
My brother in law trained for years to qualify for Boston but he could never do it despite doing repeatedly doing a higher mile Pfitzinger plan (at the time I thought he had to either have really bad aerobic adaptation or be lying about his mileage (90+ miles a week).
He then was “diagnosed” with a thyroid condition, prescribed something and dropped 10 minutes off his PR. I am not sure if this would be considered doping or if prescription thyroid medications are banned.
about a million aging guys are on testosterone therapy -- there are many commercials on TV advertising it (in the USA). Pretty sure that little patch is a nice booster!!!
I know some 50 years who're more 'ripped to shreds' than any 20 year olds ive ever met
I think that a lot of people who have done competitive sports for decades will agree when I say that it is often a person's physique than performance that makes me suspicious. (Someone can be on TRT but still train poorly or have limited talent/ceiling, of course!)
While it isn't unusual for an endurance athlete to be quite lean in older age, or for a devoted powerlifter to stay pretty big, with older age it becomes much more rare to see the 'hard' vascularity that is prominent with very low body fat.
You know the look, and there is no question that TRT promotes that. I just don't know how many guys like this in their 50s/60s are TRT-boosted. The stats are that prescribing is skyrocketing, and obviously athletes may be likely to be interested in the benefits.
If you think about it doping in hobby jogging has less negative effects on others than professionals doping. At least hobby joggers are only effecting themselves
Their motivation for starting TRT are usually far more benign - general lack of drive; middle age malaise; an attempt to salvage a marriage (or to begin again after divorce); to improve a fading sex life
Are guys in their 40s-50s-60s really having sex life problems because of low T?
I am not having any issues there in my mid-40s...sadly the problem is my wife keeping up.
As a masters mid-distance runner I do wonder if TRT could help with muscular fatigue/recovery. I am just so much more trashed than back in my 30s after speedwork and heavy lifting...but the only way I know to prevent losses (and boost T?) is to keep sprinting and lifting heavy.