The problem is idiots like you don't understand the science. You're told something stupid and that it's "SCIENCE" and then you believe it like it's gospel because your cult said so and used the word science...
Tell us more about about the "science" behind your idiot COVID position.
Even after it was scientifically proven that the vaccine did f*ck all to stop the spread of the virus you idiots were still trying to destroy people lives for not being vaccinated...
And if unhinged morons like you weren't around we wouldn't need to spend millions on security for a president to leave his house.
Somehow, after the COVID-19 vaccines were released and became politicized, Republicans in Ohio died with greater frequency than Democrats in Ohio.
It couldn’t be that the vaccines were providing greater protection against illness and death, as their clinical trials demonstrated, could it?
The vaccines were effective at reducing the severity of the virus.
What in the blue F*CK does that have to do with anything???
People like you were demanding people's lives be destroyed if they weren't vaccinated.
Nurses and doctors were fired from their jobs for not getting a vaccine which did literally nothing to keep them or their patients from catching or spreading COVID.
Being vaccinated did NOTHING to prevent anyone from catching or spreading COVID.
It's 2025 and your cult still has no idea what happened...
The problem is idiots like you don't understand the science. You're told something stupid and that it's "SCIENCE" and then you believe it like it's gospel because your cult said so and used the word science...
Tell us more about about the "science" behind your idiot COVID position.
Even after it was scientifically proven that the vaccine did f*ck all to stop the spread of the virus you idiots were still trying to destroy people lives for not being vaccinated...
And if unhinged morons like you weren't around we wouldn't need to spend millions on security for a president to leave his house.
For infections caused by any SARS-CoV-2 strain, vaccine effectiveness for the primary series reduced from 83% (95% CI 80–86) at baseline (14–42 days) to 62% (53–69) by 112–139 days. Vaccine effectiveness at baseline was 92% (88–94) for hospitalisations and 91% (85–95) for mortality, and reduced to 79% (65–87) at 224–251 days for hospitalisations and 86% (73–93) at 168–195 days for mortality. Estimated vaccine effectiveness was lower for the omicron variant for infections, hospitalisations, and mortality at baseline compared with that of other variants, but subsequent reductions occurred at a similar rate across variants. For booster doses, which covered mostly omicron studies, vaccine effectiveness at baseline was 70% (56–80) against infections and 89% (82–93) against hospitalisations, and reduced to 43% (14–62) against infections and 71% (51–83) against hospitalisations at 112 days or later. Not enough studies were available to report on booster vaccine effectiveness against mortality.
Now. Your turn. Show us this “science” that the COVID vaccine wasn’t effective.
All you have to do is refute the results of the 68 studies included in the above analysis. That should be easy for somebody that did “some graduate school” and thinks they’re an expert on epidemiology. Be sure to use FACTS and STATISTICS in your analysis. Again, this should t be a problem for somebody that failed high school biology, but almost got a masters degree.
p.s. Still waiting for you to clearly articulate the conservative position beyond “science is bad”.
It couldn’t be that the vaccines were providing greater protection against illness and death, as their clinical trials demonstrated, could it?
The vaccines were effective at reducing the severity of the virus.
What in the blue F*CK does that have to do with anything???
People like you were demanding people's lives be destroyed if they weren't vaccinated.
Nurses and doctors were fired from their jobs for not getting a vaccine which did literally nothing to keep them or their patients from catching or spreading COVID.
Being vaccinated did NOTHING to prevent anyone from catching or spreading COVID.
It's 2025 and your cult still has no idea what happened...
You seem to have a condition where you just assume that you know everything about a person based on a morsel of information. Your username tracks with that, that you automatically consider yourself the wiser, more mature voice of reason and authority on any subject.
To your point, the data is consistent that there is a net medical benefit to being vaccinated against COVID-19.
To your ridiculous assumptions towards me, you can’t cite a single instance where I have ever demanded or cajoled anyone into taking any form of a medical treatment. “People like you” what the hell do you know about me? You don’t know me, or how I conduct my life or the people I associate with.
You don’t want to get the COVID vaccine? That’s fine, it doesn’t have anything to do with me. See you at work tomorrow.
You don’t want to wear a facemask? I don’t blame you, they’re not fun to wear. See you at work tomorrow.
You don’t want your kids to get the MMR vaccine? That’s fine, I hope it all works out for them. See you at work tomorrow.
I’m going to do what I think is best for me and I welcome everyone else to do what they think is best for them.
I would normally recommend that you not assume you know so much about someone from such minor exchanges, but I’m sure, as with everything else, you already knew that.
Now. Your turn. Show us this “science” that the COVID vaccine wasn’t effective.
All you have to do is refute the results of the 68 studies included in the above analysis. That should be easy for somebody that did “some graduate school” and thinks they’re an expert on epidemiology. Be sure to use FACTS and STATISTICS in your analysis. Again, this should t be a problem for somebody that failed high school biology, but almost got a masters degree.
p.s. Still waiting for you to clearly articulate the conservative position beyond “science is bad”.
You don’t want to wear a facemask? I don’t blame you,
Frick masks. Saw another idiot wearing one while driving last week, alone. Back to the OP, if it was in biden's last two years it was likely one of his handlers. He was napping.
You don’t want to wear a facemask? I don’t blame you,
Frick masks. Saw another idiot wearing one while driving last week, alone. Back to the OP, if it was in biden's last two years it was likely one of his handlers. He was napping.
Making hating masks your entire personality years after anyone has been asked to wear one is a bit weird though.
So to summarize…..either Trump is incredibly stupid as are his speechwriters, or he’s hoping his cult is just low IQ. Which is it is for you to decide.
Now. Your turn. Show us this “science” that the COVID vaccine wasn’t effective.
All you have to do is refute the results of the 68 studies included in the above analysis. That should be easy for somebody that did “some graduate school” and thinks they’re an expert on epidemiology. Be sure to use FACTS and STATISTICS in your analysis. Again, this should t be a problem for somebody that failed high school biology, but almost got a masters degree.
p.s. Still waiting for you to clearly articulate the conservative position beyond “science is bad”.
Explain how those results have anything to do with vaccine mandates for healthy people.
If you were 400 pounds or 70 years old the vaccine was very effective at keeping you from dying if you caught the virus.
It did NOTHING to keep you from catching it.
A healthy 14 year old was just as likely to take to the virus home from school whether they were vaccinated or unvaccinated.
You're being smug and condescending while demonstrating you don't understand what you're talking about.
You should be embarrassed.
1) Science demonstrates that the vaccines were effective at reducing the severity of COVID.
2) Science demonstrates that the vaccines were effective at reducing transmission of COVID.
Overall, the likelihood of household transmission was approximately 40 to 50% lower in households of index patients who had been vaccinated 21 days or more before testing positive than in households of unvaccinated index patients; the findings were similar for the two vaccines.
Cases of Covid-19 were less common among household members of vaccinated health care workers during the period beginning 14 days after the first dose than during the unvaccinated period before the first dose (event rate per 100 person-years, 9.40 before the first dose and 5.93 beginning 14 days after the first dose). After the health care worker’s second dose, the rate in household members was lower still (2.98 cases per 100 person-years).
Background Pre-Delta, vaccination reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission from individuals infected despite vaccination, potentially via reducing viral loads. While vaccination still lowers the risk of infection, similar viral loads...
So, support your statements with peer-reviewed studies and I'll consider taking you seriously. Until then, you're not the adult in the room, you're the turd in the toilet who clearly has no understanding of what you're talking about (which explains why you failed high school biology).
The vaccines were effective at reducing the severity of the virus.
What in the blue F*CK does that have to do with anything???
People like you were demanding people's lives be destroyed if they weren't vaccinated.
Nurses and doctors were fired from their jobs for not getting a vaccine which did literally nothing to keep them or their patients from catching or spreading COVID.
Being vaccinated did NOTHING to prevent anyone from catching or spreading COVID.
It's 2025 and your cult still has no idea what happened...
You seem to have a condition where you just assume that you know everything about a person based on a morsel of information. Your username tracks with that, that you automatically consider yourself the wiser, more mature voice of reason and authority on any subject.
To your point, the data is consistent that there is a net medical benefit to being vaccinated against COVID-19.
To your ridiculous assumptions towards me, you can’t cite a single instance where I have ever demanded or cajoled anyone into taking any form of a medical treatment. “People like you” what the hell do you know about me? You don’t know me, or how I conduct my life or the people I associate with.
You don’t want to get the COVID vaccine? That’s fine, it doesn’t have anything to do with me. See you at work tomorrow.
You don’t want to wear a facemask? I don’t blame you, they’re not fun to wear. See you at work tomorrow.
You don’t want your kids to get the MMR vaccine? That’s fine, I hope it all works out for them. See you at work tomorrow.
I’m going to do what I think is best for me and I welcome everyone else to do what they think is best for them.
I would normally recommend that you not assume you know so much about someone from such minor exchanges, but I’m sure, as with everything else, you already knew that.
You say you'll do what's best for you and welcome everyone else to do the same...
Are you pretending you're unaware that the government was firing people for not getting vaccinated?
That irrational statement alone proves my assumption about you is 100% true.
You seem to have a condition where you just assume that you know everything about a person based on a morsel of information. Your username tracks with that, that you automatically consider yourself the wiser, more mature voice of reason and authority on any subject.
To your point, the data is consistent that there is a net medical benefit to being vaccinated against COVID-19.
To your ridiculous assumptions towards me, you can’t cite a single instance where I have ever demanded or cajoled anyone into taking any form of a medical treatment. “People like you” what the hell do you know about me? You don’t know me, or how I conduct my life or the people I associate with.
You don’t want to get the COVID vaccine? That’s fine, it doesn’t have anything to do with me. See you at work tomorrow.
You don’t want to wear a facemask? I don’t blame you, they’re not fun to wear. See you at work tomorrow.
You don’t want your kids to get the MMR vaccine? That’s fine, I hope it all works out for them. See you at work tomorrow.
I’m going to do what I think is best for me and I welcome everyone else to do what they think is best for them.
I would normally recommend that you not assume you know so much about someone from such minor exchanges, but I’m sure, as with everything else, you already knew that.
You say you'll do what's best for you and welcome everyone else to do the same...
Are you pretending you're unaware that the government was firing people for not getting vaccinated?
That irrational statement alone proves my assumption about you is 100% true.
Government was cutting waste by firing people who were borderline retarded. You have a problem with that?
Still waiting for you to present evidence to support your posts and to define what "the conservative viewpoint" actually is.
Put that hard-earned almost masters degree to use! This is your chance!
Explain how those results have anything to do with vaccine mandates for healthy people.
If you were 400 pounds or 70 years old the vaccine was very effective at keeping you from dying if you caught the virus.
It did NOTHING to keep you from catching it.
A healthy 14 year old was just as likely to take to the virus home from school whether they were vaccinated or unvaccinated.
You're being smug and condescending while demonstrating you don't understand what you're talking about.
You should be embarrassed.
1) Science demonstrates that the vaccines were effective at reducing the severity of COVID.
2) Science demonstrates that the vaccines were effective at reducing transmission of COVID.
Overall, the likelihood of household transmission was approximately 40 to 50% lower in households of index patients who had been vaccinated 21 days or more before testing positive than in households of unvaccinated index patients; the findings were similar for the two vaccines.
Cases of Covid-19 were less common among household members of vaccinated health care workers during the period beginning 14 days after the first dose than during the unvaccinated period before the first dose (event rate per 100 person-years, 9.40 before the first dose and 5.93 beginning 14 days after the first dose). After the health care worker’s second dose, the rate in household members was lower still (2.98 cases per 100 person-years).
So, support your statements with peer-reviewed studies and I'll consider taking you seriously. Until then, you're not the adult in the room, you're the turd in the toilet who clearly has no understanding of what you're talking about (which explains why you failed high school biology).
What should I be embarrassed about, exactly?
40-50% effective means 50-60% ineffective.
Throw in the vaccine injuries and the fact that COVID was virtually harmless to healthy young people and it is insanity to fire people for not getting a vaccine....
Where's the peer reviewed study that says surfing alone was a threat to humanity but a BLM riot is an exclusion zone?
The COVID response was a sh*t show from top to bottom.
You say you'll do what's best for you and welcome everyone else to do the same...
Are you pretending you're unaware that the government was firing people for not getting vaccinated?
That irrational statement alone proves my assumption about you is 100% true.
Government was cutting waste by firing people who were borderline retarded. You have a problem with that?
Still waiting for you to present evidence to support your posts and to define what "the conservative viewpoint" actually is.
Put that hard-earned almost masters degree to use! This is your chance!
No I don't care that the government fired you. And calling yourself "borderline" is quite a stretch.
Limited government
Fiscal responsibility
Freedom of speech
Free markets
Peace through strength
Those are generally accepted by most conservatives. Unlike your cult there is a variety of viewpoints on the right. Conservatives don't all agree and read from the same script like leftists do.
You seem to have a condition where you just assume that you know everything about a person based on a morsel of information. Your username tracks with that, that you automatically consider yourself the wiser, more mature voice of reason and authority on any subject.
To your point, the data is consistent that there is a net medical benefit to being vaccinated against COVID-19.
To your ridiculous assumptions towards me, you can’t cite a single instance where I have ever demanded or cajoled anyone into taking any form of a medical treatment. “People like you” what the hell do you know about me? You don’t know me, or how I conduct my life or the people I associate with.
You don’t want to get the COVID vaccine? That’s fine, it doesn’t have anything to do with me. See you at work tomorrow.
You don’t want to wear a facemask? I don’t blame you, they’re not fun to wear. See you at work tomorrow.
You don’t want your kids to get the MMR vaccine? That’s fine, I hope it all works out for them. See you at work tomorrow.
I’m going to do what I think is best for me and I welcome everyone else to do what they think is best for them.
I would normally recommend that you not assume you know so much about someone from such minor exchanges, but I’m sure, as with everything else, you already knew that.
You say you'll do what's best for you and welcome everyone else to do the same...
Are you pretending you're unaware that the government was firing people for not getting vaccinated?
That irrational statement alone proves my assumption about you is 100% true.
You said that people like me were getting people fired for not taking a vaccine. I didn’t fire anyone for not taking a vaccine. I’m not the government. I thought that was clear.
So, support your statements with peer-reviewed studies and I'll consider taking you seriously. Until then, you're not the adult in the room, you're the turd in the toilet who clearly has no understanding of what you're talking about (which explains why you failed high school biology).
What should I be embarrassed about, exactly?
40-50% effective means 50-60% ineffective.
Throw in the vaccine injuries and the fact that COVID was virtually harmless to healthy young people and it is insanity to fire people for not getting a vaccine....
Where's the peer reviewed study that says surfing alone was a threat to humanity but a BLM riot is an exclusion zone?
The COVID response was a sh*t show from top to bottom.
TheAdultInTheRoom: "It did NOTHING to keep you from catching it."
TheAdultInTheRoom: "40-50% effective means 50-60% ineffective."
So it didn't do NOTHING?
Again, take your GED and crayons back to your double-wide, because the real adults are having a conversation here and you're just not smart enough to participate.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
