Was it hand timed? All times to 0.1" Or is there something in the rules re road races only being recorded to 0.1"?
I remember when road miles first became popular- 5th Ave, then there was a whole circuit- they were on TV (ABC) and the top runners competed. The IAAF said that all times had to be rounded up to the full second. Maybe, hopefully, they're rounding up to the 1/10th now?
If they went to the full second you'd eventually have multiple runners holding the record.
The elevation rule makes sense to me, but I dont understand the point of the percent difference of separation between start and finish. why would a road record require curves or turns?
A tailwind or headwind can reek havoc on a ptp course like the Boston marathon. The 1983 and 1994 as well as whatever year that Hall ran his 2:04, were all heavily aided by a hurricane pushing them along the course.
Trason stans will melt down about any discussion of the women's world record for 100km which was set at Saroma-ko and the Japanese were able to get a waiver from the IAAF to ignore the seperation issues with that particular course to validate the ungodly 6:33 record (pre-clown shoes.)
The controversy with the 100k was that the original rule required courses to have a separation not exceeding 30% for records. Some politicking to the IAAF resulted in the rule changed to 50%
This guy was very impolite and did not follow accepted protocol.
Ha, great catch :-)
As far as road miles go, the track record is 3:43. Wake me up when someone runs a 3:46. A 3:51 "world record" is a complete nothing burger at this point.