- Shane Cohen, Addy Wiley, top SEC sprinters (well...)
- Any sports-focused boarging school like Montverde and IMG with near world class times. Maybe add a couple oregon runners as well just because of how many resources the school would have
- World class times: Christian Miller and Quincy Wilson; nb - these aren't from true suspicions of doping due to normal progressions and physiques, it's more by virtue of the time itself. But a random test they couldn’t avoid would go a long way to assuage doubts.
- Top HS (past and present) but not globally elite: Danny Simmons, Drew Griffith, Newbury Park alum's who aren't now tested (i.e. not the one who's currently pro and who has noticabley lighter bone structure than the others)As someone who ran a hair under 9:00 in the mid 2000's off of moderate training for that time (about 50 mpw in season, 60 during cross) I would expect to see progression if people have run more mileage along with shoes benefiting 3 seconds per mile. But especially because it seems like the times needed to get recruited get a bit faster each year, what'll be the recruiting standards for Stanford and top Ivies in a few years? Sub 8:40 or sub 4? My brother's kid is 14 and knows how fast he'd have to run in 4 years
So why wouldn't people dope to get in when a non-zero number of people are doing it as well? And especially because people can get paid for their performance* yet never get tested, what's stopping people?