Is training at altitude useless?

rekrunner wrote:

Khamis wrote:

Ok look here, dear rekrunner. I read your human soul extremely well. I know that given your type of scrupulous indeed pretentious nature (given your insane lack of remorse for Alberto Salaazar's 'crimes') you are UNLIKELY to respond favorably to any single one article that remotely or directly reference the harmful effects of anthropogenic RF and EMF on human biology (of which high-performance physiology is subject to!!!!!!!!!).

I know your type of person, I can see it in the way you argue, speak and pay homage to. I know where your allegiances lie and my out of this world psychoanalysis tells me that you are UNLIKELY indeed UNABLE to come to any consciousness in space-time that high-performance physiology, which is completely human biology, is subject second after second, day after day to the electromagnetic sunlight, to the earth's electromagnetic field, to the electromagnetic cosmic rays, indeed to therefore every single possible anthropogenic electromagnetic source on earth whether they be cellphone towers, GPS, bluetooth, WiFi, power frequency etc.

Pardon me for being so negative about you but I'm sorry I'm forced to come to such a pyschoanalytic conclusion about you after the nightmare conversation I experienced with you concerning Alberto Salaazar and how you were unbelievably nonchalant about his sins and crimes against humanity!!!

Do you think I will want to sacrifice any of my time and effort just to put a dozen or even 1 single publication about how anthropogenic RF and EMF alters any one single aspect or signalling of any one single human biological faculty or organ/cell system on the planet earth only for you to later dismiss it using the same exact two-faced and hypocritical modus operandi you exhibited towards defending Alberto Salaazar's sins and crimes against humanity???? Come on dear rekrunner, I'm not that stupid, I know human souls extremely well because of inspiration of Christ in Scripture what SIN means!!!!

Sin is an apathy and ambivalence like yours, dear rekrunner!!! So please show me some sincerity and rather school me by showing me (your RF King) publications that dismiss my claims that anthropogenic RF and EMF do not affect human biology, and by extension, human physiology which is a faculty of human biology!

There are no direct publications surrounding anthropogenic RF and EMF and high-performance endurance ability because honestly sports scientists who are responsible for making such researches are probably not half as qualified enough in the arena of electromagnetic theory and behavior to tolerate the extremely complex scale of such research. Sports scientists are the lowest caste of scientists on earth, did you know that! Nikola Tesla obviously beats Ross Tucker in terms of real electromagnetic substance, did you know?? However, I can easily fish out from the back of mind right now data from a random well known publication that shows that the tiniest levels of anthropogenic RF and EMF disarrays biological including genetic cell signaling and gene sequencing ability! But am I supposed to spoon-feed a hypocritical person like you such information only for you to abuse and dismiss it? No I'm not that stupid!!!

Now, as for Renato Canova, I have huge respect for him for obvious reasons but I again would like to emphasize that EVEN HE does not have complete knowledge and understanding of human biology hence high-performance distance running who FLAGRANTLY AND PRESUMPTUOUSLY omits the combined balance/resultant effects of NATURAL + UNNATURAL (ANTHROPOGENIC) RF and EMFs in space-time on the biology and epigenetics of a high-performance distance runner or otherwise!

Just look at Renato's treatise on previous LRC threads regarding altitude training, you can just google, in nowhere does he relate directly or show any appreciation or acknowledgement of the combined resultant/balance effects of NATURAL + UNNATURAL (ANTHROPOGENIC) RF and EMFs in space and time on the biology and epigenetics of a high-performance distance runner or otherwise, does he????

So what you are seeing here is that in an entire history of LRC or the planet earth, there is only ever 1 man, or 1 King of knowledge rather, which is me (no tooting horn here!!!) who bridges, or dares bridges the great seemingly insurmountable and even unfathomable distance or gap between high-performance physiology/biology or distance running, and, RF and EMF anthropogenic and natural combined. Actually, there is nothing daring about what I bridge here, it's supposed to be this way just like an apple is supposed to fall to the ground when you drop it from mid-air. You are SUPPOSED TO KNOW SO even without a publication saying that RF/EMF affects whether positively or negatively human biology and by extension high-performance physiology! Do you need to teach a man how to consummate his marriage with his wife or something??? Obviously not, he just knows what to do duhhhhh!!!!!

Am I a psycho or given to lunacy for bridging this disparate link or am I ingenious??? Are LRC or the folks of planet earth just too damn uninitiated to the effects of RF and EMF on all life much less on all electrical beings (indeed human beings!!!) and entities which therefore makes folks like me seemingly with some supernatural knowledge and understanding???

Am I just so 'clever' or are the folks on LRC and planet earth just so 'behind time' hence 'stupid' for not knowing these things???

In all humility, the things and relevation I say and make are 100 years of history in the making or since the turn of the 20th century and accelerated since the Cold War among the CIA, KGB, and top military institutes in those era. I'm not clever, I'm just 'fortunate' or 'lucky' to know these knowledge and be able to make attendant logic and conclusions/judgement effortlessly including making psychoanalyses on human behavior. You, dear rekrunner, like the rest of LRC folks, are simply 'less fortunate' and therefore in no way inferior in terms of IQ or EQ to folks like me!

That I am ahead of you, dear rekrunner, in the arena of RF and EMF doesn't make me 'cleverer' than you because my responsibility is to invoke in you to go in search of the knowledge YOURSELF rather than hypocritically ask for the information from me!

Thank you with much love and cheers!

For someone who doesn't want to sacrifice his time, you seem to put a lot of time into discussing the topic. But if you say RF/EMF effects on physiology is not important enough for you to sacrifice your time and effort, then it must not be important enough for me either.

You can spare me the psycho-analysis -- attacking my psychology based on what you fear I might do doesn't help make your point stronger. I will accept your representation that the science is immature, and the relevant publications and authorities and proving the hypotheses are premature and still a work in progress.

Regarding our conversation about Salazar, you have clearly jumped to many wrong conclusions. You kept trying to change the subject, and talk to me about Salazar sins, as a response to me talking about subjective accusations of all NOP athletes. We were not having the same conversation with the same subjects. For the record, I don't condone any of Salazar's "crimes", but that has nothing to do with my commentary about whether Runnerboi's video was objective or subjective. You seemed to agree with me then that it was subjective, and necessarily so, and faulting me for not knowing when it is time to be subjective.

Given this experience with you jumping to a host of wrong conclusions (either unwittingly or surreptitiously), I am only increasingly concerned about the filter you use to pollute your river of knowledge, and will put your ideas in limbo until they can be authoritatively corroborated.

Khamis wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

For someone who doesn't want to sacrifice his time, you seem to put a lot of time into discussing the topic. But if you say RF/EMF effects on physiology is not important enough for you to sacrifice your time and effort, then it must not be important enough for me either.

You can spare me the psycho-analysis -- attacking my psychology based on what you fear I might do doesn't help make your point stronger. I will accept your representation that the science is immature, and the relevant publications and authorities and proving the hypotheses are premature and still a work in progress.

Regarding our conversation about Salazar, you have clearly jumped to many wrong conclusions. You kept trying to change the subject, and talk to me about Salazar sins, as a response to me talking about subjective accusations of all NOP athletes. We were not having the same conversation with the same subjects. For the record, I don't condone any of Salazar's "crimes", but that has nothing to do with my commentary about whether Runnerboi's video was objective or subjective. You seemed to agree with me then that it was subjective, and necessarily so, and faulting me for not knowing when it is time to be subjective.

Given this experience with you jumping to a host of wrong conclusions (either unwittingly or surreptitiously), I am only increasingly concerned about the filter you use to pollute your river of knowledge, and will put your ideas in limbo until they can be authoritatively corroborated.

Look, dear rekrunner, I'm the one in advanced of the knowledge I claim exist and you are the one in absence of the knowledge you claim don't exist. Existence has the advantage here, not non-existence. You shouldn't put words into my mouth, I didn't say the science didn't exist or was immature, I said it was 100 years in the making or since 1900.

You are in control of your destiny, dear rekrunner, stop acting like I'm responsible for your life, your knowledge and lack thereof! A sincere and authentic person whose learning never ends goes in search of the knowledge on a hint or suggestion and not be presented wholesale on a silver platter! I'm not your lackey lol!!!

Look you can't stop me from psychoanalyzing you, dear rekrunner, you can't stop me from knowing and understanding human behavior including yours! When I first stepped into LRC I knew I would be attacked sexually and indeed I was. I was labelled, buffeted and scorned with all sorts of sexual stereotypes, I knew what was coming! Jesus Christ also knew what was coming for him when he stepped into the Earth to spread his love. He knew he was going to be attacked and ignored. My psychoanalysis of you, and since I don't think you are God fearing Christian, is absolutely prophetically and divinely mediated the way Jesus prophesized his death! He knew, I knew............

Wanna test it out with me huh? Wanna me splash an RF publication right in front of you and predict what you are going to reply and respond?? There is nothing unproven, inconclusive in the realm of RF biological harmful effects, only politicians and telecoms salespersons say that or those that favor them and their multi trillion dollar business. I foresee all these business and profit-making agendas in your reply to me before I ever showed you a publication! And you already foresee yourself saying 'the science is immature' before I ever showed you said publication.

And stop hiding behind excuses like 'anonymous forum' and 'anonymous nobody' please. So you think someone of the stature of the American President Joe Biden can come onto LRC or any forum and tell you the truth? Or you think American Telecom representative can meet you in person or on the forum and tell you mobile phone radiation is healthy? You kinda dumb af here!

Wake up your stupid idea my friend!!!

Khamis wrote:

I just want to re-emphasize and re-drill it in you from post #57 that height/altitude/elevation above sea level is mediated by electromagnetic pressure (fields/forces)!

The very elevation we are all talking about is electromagnetic, specifically electric or electrostatic pressure. It's a pressure, and it's electrostatic, and these electrostatic pressures are rapidly varying relative to absolute space and absolute time, but their rapid variation is also with respect or relative to the sun, to the universe and Aether specifically and doesn't change in this regard, so this rapid absolute variation doesn't mean the partial oxygen pressure at high elevation suddenly changes from one value to another. There is no relative difference!

For the earth-sun system to rapidly vary their electrostatic pressures hence electromagnetic forces that mediate between them, they both have to emit or communicate so via RF waves or Micro waves. If you didn't know this then I don't know how to make you know!

So the way high-performance human physiology behaves and reacts with RF and EMF from all natural and unnatural sources is a direct microcosm of the way the earth and sun communicate with each other, rapidly and via RF and Micro waves/photons!

Guys like you are fixated on making logical deductions 'within context' and 'within limitations' it's little wonder why you are not suited to study and appreciate the laws and behavior of electromagnetic theory! Electromagnetic theory eschews 'within context' and 'within limitations' because it's not a pretentious and hypocritical subject. It's real and highly substantial, it's avant-garde, it's advanced, it's go-go-go, there is not wait and see, timidity or shyness, no two-faced legal clauses and motions for Salaazar to hide behind. You are thus more well-suited to adjudicate pretentious and hypocritical legal proceedings in a man-made court or judicial setting.

Khamis wrote:

Look, dear rekrunner, I'm the one in advanced of the knowledge I claim exist and you are the one in absence of the knowledge you claim don't exist. Existence has the advantage here, not non-existence. You shouldn't put words into my mouth, I didn't say the science didn't exist or was immature, I said it was 100 years in the making or since 1900.

You are in control of your destiny, dear rekrunner, stop acting like I'm responsible for your life, your knowledge and lack thereof! A sincere and authentic person whose learning never ends goes in search of the knowledge on a hint or suggestion and not be presented wholesale on a silver platter! I'm not your lackey lol!!!

Look you can't stop me from psychoanalyzing you, dear rekrunner, you can't stop me from knowing and understanding human behavior including yours! When I first stepped into LRC I knew I would be attacked sexually and indeed I was. I was labelled, buffeted and scorned with all sorts of sexual stereotypes, I knew what was coming! Jesus Christ also knew what was coming for him when he stepped into the Earth to spread his love. He knew he was going to be attacked and ignored. My psychoanalysis of you, and since I don't think you are God fearing Christian, is absolutely prophetically and divinely mediated the way Jesus prophesized his death! He knew, I knew............

Wanna test it out with me huh? Wanna me splash an RF publication right in front of you and predict what you are going to reply and respond?? There is nothing unproven, inconclusive in the realm of RF biological harmful effects, only politicians and telecoms salespersons say that or those that favor them and their multi trillion dollar business. I foresee all these business and profit-making agendas in your reply to me before I ever showed you a publication! And you already foresee yourself saying 'the science is immature' before I ever showed you said publication.

And stop hiding behind excuses like 'anonymous forum' and 'anonymous nobody' please. So you think someone of the stature of the American President Joe Biden can come onto LRC or any forum and tell you the truth? Or you think American Telecom representative can meet you in person or on the forum and tell you mobile phone radiation is healthy? You kinda dumb af here!

Wake up your stupid idea my friend!!!

rekrunner wrote:

Khamis wrote:

Incorrect, most runners that go to altitude are going there as modern young men and women already previously irradiated like crazy in their cities and districts. Upon going to altitude they therefore lack perfect adaptative capabilities because their bodies are already ELECTROCUTED (DAMAGED!!!). This means they are unable to produce higher red blood cell numbers with fuller or fullest volume and buoyancy so they basically are just producing higher cell numbers with smaller volume so that they end up with the same hematocrit ratio which according to Renato Canova stays the same for all his modern irradiated athletes born at sea level despite changes in elevation with very minor and insignificant fluctuations!

The ability of the body to transport oxygen efficiently is dependent on A RATIO which means A DELICATE BALANCE between RBC volume against total blood plasma volume!!! And blood viscosity, blood velocity, blood purity, health of endothelium etc. It has nothing to do with RBC NUMBERS as all!

Compare that to runners who were already born and raised at altitude like Kenenisa Bekele, already unexposed to anthropogenic RF and EMF from birth till adulthood or far less exposure than young American/European men and women in their respective cities and districts, it's quite obvious Kenenisa Bekele would have perfect adaptation of red blood cells with fullest volume and zero clogging or impurities in his blood.

You ask me to point to something authoritative, well I'm pointing you to Renato Canova duh! Whereas on the RF and EMF side, do I need to meet you face to face to show you how authoritative I am at RF and EMF related matters of human biology?

The whole point of another authority supporting what you say is to remove you as a potential filter causing distortion. For this purpose, pretend no one believes you are the expert (because this is an anonymous forum and you cannot be authenticated with an anonymous handle), and then try to convince us based on what other authenticated authorities in the RF and EMF fields are saying about biology and distance running and irradiated blood.

I don't want you to tell me what Renato said, but show me where he said it, in context. I don't want to meet you face to face, but tell me where I can find some other authority in your field saying that RF and EMF electrocution is making distance runners slower. Otherwise you stand alone.

Not sure what you want to say about hematocrit, or what you think Renato said, but in a 1997 altitude study, the athletes living at altitude increased red cell mass volume (in ml/kg) by about 9% after 4 weeks at altitude.

Renato also said that extended altitude training helps sea-level athletes, like Sondre Moens.

Brofessor Nerdmore wrote:

Khamis wrote:

I just want to re-emphasize and re-drill it in you from post #57 that height/altitude/elevation above sea level is mediated by electromagnetic pressure (fields/forces)!

The very elevation we are all talking about is electromagnetic, specifically electric or electrostatic pressure. It's a pressure, and it's electrostatic, and these electrostatic pressures are rapidly varying relative to absolute space and absolute time, but their rapid variation is also with respect or relative to the sun, to the universe and Aether specifically and doesn't change in this regard, so this rapid absolute variation doesn't mean the partial oxygen pressure at high elevation suddenly changes from one value to another. There is no relative difference!

For the earth-sun system to rapidly vary their electrostatic pressures hence electromagnetic forces that mediate between them, they both have to emit or communicate so via RF waves or Micro waves. If you didn't know this then I don't know how to make you know!

So the way high-performance human physiology behaves and reacts with RF and EMF from all natural and unnatural sources is a direct microcosm of the way the earth and sun communicate with each other, rapidly and via RF and Micro waves/photons!

Guys like you are fixated on making logical deductions 'within context' and 'within limitations' it's little wonder why you are not suited to study and appreciate the laws and behavior of electromagnetic theory! Electromagnetic theory eschews 'within context' and 'within limitations' because it's not a pretentious and hypocritical subject. It's real and highly substantial, it's avant-garde, it's advanced, it's go-go-go, there is not wait and see, timidity or shyness, no two-faced legal clauses and motions for Salaazar to hide behind. You are thus more well-suited to adjudicate pretentious and hypocritical legal proceedings in a man-made court or judicial setting.

Lay off the weed bro.

Well,,,,, wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

The whole point of another authority supporting what you say is to remove you as a potential filter causing distortion. For this purpose, pretend no one believes you are the expert (because this is an anonymous forum and you cannot be authenticated with an anonymous handle), and then try to convince us based on what other authenticated authorities in the RF and EMF fields are saying about biology and distance running and irradiated blood.

I don't want you to tell me what Renato said, but show me where he said it, in context. I don't want to meet you face to face, but tell me where I can find some other authority in your field saying that RF and EMF electrocution is making distance runners slower. Otherwise you stand alone.

Not sure what you want to say about hematocrit, or what you think Renato said, but in a 1997 altitude study, the athletes living at altitude increased red cell mass volume (in ml/kg) by about 9% after 4 weeks at altitude.

Renato also said that extended altitude training helps sea-level athletes, like Sondre Moens.

I can't believe you bothered to reply to this complete crackpot.

Khamis wrote:

Dear all, I lay the definition of maverick from the Oxford dictionary:
a person who thinks and acts in an independent way, often behaving differently from the expected or usual way!

I hereby declare I'm a maverick in a good way, an avant garde rather, a leading indeed cutting edge, a nod to distant posterity! I literally cut you folks up and destroy all your conventions, and I'm sorry, yes I really am!

Yet I feel a little embarrassed for you folks because the information I lay down here weren't never supposed to be 'avant garde' or like those from a maverick being 100 years in the making. It was simply forgotten by YOUR predecessors or ancestors due to being lured away by the lusts of their eyes such as those of sex, power, status and money/profits! I'm merely helping you recall back what your predecessors or ancestors deserted which you otherwise would never have heard of or knew in your entire lifetime. I, Khamis, the King of RF, am merely paying the price for hearkening back to the real truth or WAY OF LIFE that your ancestors NEGLECTED AND FORGO. I'm being taunted, abused, scorned, insulted and persecuted like The Christ by the heathen, sinful and unrepentant LRC. I'm even sorrier for that!

Heathen folks on LRC think I'm either denied sex, high on drugs or posting under the influence of alcohol according to what I have experienced when in actual reality my nervous system and brain is a million times more on point and firing on all cylinders than theirs!

Khamis wrote:

Look again, dear rekrunner, I'm commanding you 24hrs to go to the vastness of the world wide web and dutifully scan through the hundreds of URLs that might suggest a link between anything RF/EMF with anything human biology. Don't play this dark and twisted game of hide and seek with me now!

My ideas are the least irradiated because I'm sandwiched between the ocean and a huge mountain range with the nearest cell or any radio tower 2 kilometers away and electricity that is mostly DC rather than AC using a AC to DC converter! None of my devices are wireless either because they are all wired up with very minimum RF from microprocessors and the like. Tell me which man or woman on LRC can be so intentionally intelligent in this manner? Is that you rekrunner? If you can boast it, I will believe it. The problem is you don't even know such a refined existence like mine exist much less imagine so?? It isn't even in your thoughts to begin with so you have no such intelligence to pursue at all!!

"Apparently it goes both ways...."

This is incorrect assumption. This (moral) assumption usually applies to acts of human love and kindness. Doing unto others what you want others do unto you since it goes both ways. Don't judge others on a matter of any sin unless you yourself have acquitted yourself handsomely of the same etc!

But the matter we are discussing pertains to whether there are or would have been electromagnetic scientists or physicists capable of making insights into the realm of high-performance sport physiology which is not a moral issue per se! It's a question of skill or technical capacity rather!!!

Sports science is the lowest category of science if not one of the lowest. Physics is the highest, and within Physics electromagnetic Physics is the highest, even higher than quantum physics!!! All of quantum Physics is controlled by the laws of electromagnetic Physics but not vice versa. It doesn't work both ways!

But electromagnetic Physics is also a philosophy apart from being a science. It also carries with it implicit moral and spiritual meaning as all other subjects do. Only a higher philosophy, higher science, higher morality/spirituality like electromagnetic Physics has the ability to make an insight about a lower philosophy, lower science, lower morality/spirituality like sports science but not the other way round, just like the way electromagnetic Physics can command quantum Physics but not the other way round.

The classical electromagnetic Physicists like Nikola Tesla, Thomas Morton, William Thomson, Charles Searle, Oliver Heaviside were all proven true like 'prophets' whenever they made insights half a century ahead of their time, especially Nikola Tesla who had a lot insights to give and share with every other faculty of preoccupation of mankind, even business and marketing!!! He predicted typewriters would become out of vogue while one-touch screen and pads and digital buttons would gain hegemony in a new world, and he was right!!! He predicted it exactly 100 years before Steve Jobs made it a reality in 2000s!!! Tesla didn't need to conduct any research or scientific experimentation to make his insight, HE JUST FRIGGIN KNEW because an electromagnetic avant garde like him bestowed him with powers of 'seeing' and 'knowing' things ahead of time like a mind-reader or otherwise like a prophet of God! You can bet he was a good psychoanalyst as well, it's all part of the package of being an electromagnetic avant garde.

You really think Ross Tucker a sports scientist has any technical ability to interpret and give insight for creating a futuristic spaceship with electropropulsion on Edwin H. Hall (American Journal of Math, Vol ii [1879], p. 287) about an electromagnetic experiment with a gold-foil covered ebonite disk in a magnetic field despite 1 entire year of diligent study? Or do you think Edwin H Hall would have effortlessly given insight about high-performance physiology or human biology after only 1 hour of introduction to it?

It's easier to master and give insight about sports science in limited time than master avant garde electromagnetic physics in infinite time because the former science and philosophy is a farmer's league compared to the true elites in the latter!!! It's so easy for me to come onto LRC, therefore, and 'insult' everybody's knowledge including all the 'best' coaches on here but I will be schooled completely if I were to go to a forum reserved for avant garde electromagnetic Physicists!!!

rekrunner wrote:

Khamis wrote:

Dear all, I lay the definition of maverick from the Oxford dictionary:
a person who thinks and acts in an independent way, often behaving differently from the expected or usual way!

I hereby declare I'm a maverick in a good way, an avant garde rather, a leading indeed cutting edge, a nod to distant posterity! I literally cut you folks up and destroy all your conventions, and I'm sorry, yes I really am!

Yet I feel a little embarrassed for you folks because the information I lay down here weren't never supposed to be 'avant garde' or like those from a maverick being 100 years in the making. It was simply forgotten by YOUR predecessors or ancestors due to being lured away by the lusts of their eyes such as those of sex, power, status and money/profits! I'm merely helping you recall back what your predecessors or ancestors deserted which you otherwise would never have heard of or knew in your entire lifetime. I, Khamis, the King of RF, am merely paying the price for hearkening back to the real truth or WAY OF LIFE that your ancestors NEGLECTED AND FORGO. I'm being taunted, abused, scorned, insulted and persecuted like The Christ by the heathen, sinful and unrepentant LRC. I'm even sorrier for that!

Heathen folks on LRC think I'm either denied sex, high on drugs or posting under the influence of alcohol according to what I have experienced when in actual reality my nervous system and brain is a million times more on point and firing on all cylinders than theirs!

Galileo fallacy?

rekrunner wrote:

Khamis wrote:

Look again, dear rekrunner, I'm commanding you 24hrs to go to the vastness of the world wide web and dutifully scan through the hundreds of URLs that might suggest a link between anything RF/EMF with anything human biology. Don't play this dark and twisted game of hide and seek with me now!

My ideas are the least irradiated because I'm sandwiched between the ocean and a huge mountain range with the nearest cell or any radio tower 2 kilometers away and electricity that is mostly DC rather than AC using a AC to DC converter! None of my devices are wireless either because they are all wired up with very minimum RF from microprocessors and the like. Tell me which man or woman on LRC can be so intentionally intelligent in this manner? Is that you rekrunner? If you can boast it, I will believe it. The problem is you don't even know such a refined existence like mine exist much less imagine so?? It isn't even in your thoughts to begin with so you have no such intelligence to pursue at all!!

"Apparently it goes both ways...."

This is incorrect assumption. This (moral) assumption usually applies to acts of human love and kindness. Doing unto others what you want others do unto you since it goes both ways. Don't judge others on a matter of any sin unless you yourself have acquitted yourself handsomely of the same etc!

But the matter we are discussing pertains to whether there are or would have been electromagnetic scientists or physicists capable of making insights into the realm of high-performance sport physiology which is not a moral issue per se! It's a question of skill or technical capacity rather!!!

Sports science is the lowest category of science if not one of the lowest. Physics is the highest, and within Physics electromagnetic Physics is the highest, even higher than quantum physics!!! All of quantum Physics is controlled by the laws of electromagnetic Physics but not vice versa. It doesn't work both ways!

But electromagnetic Physics is also a philosophy apart from being a science. It also carries with it implicit moral and spiritual meaning as all other subjects do. Only a higher philosophy, higher science, higher morality/spirituality like electromagnetic Physics has the ability to make an insight about a lower philosophy, lower science, lower morality/spirituality like sports science but not the other way round, just like the way electromagnetic Physics can command quantum Physics but not the other way round.

The classical electromagnetic Physicists like Nikola Tesla, Thomas Morton, William Thomson, Charles Searle, Oliver Heaviside were all proven true like 'prophets' whenever they made insights half a century ahead of their time, especially Nikola Tesla who had a lot insights to give and share with every other faculty of preoccupation of mankind, even business and marketing!!! He predicted typewriters would become out of vogue while one-touch screen and pads and digital buttons would gain hegemony in a new world, and he was right!!! He predicted it exactly 100 years before Steve Jobs made it a reality in 2000s!!! Tesla didn't need to conduct any research or scientific experimentation to make his insight, HE JUST FRIGGIN KNEW because an electromagnetic avant garde like him bestowed him with powers of 'seeing' and 'knowing' things ahead of time like a mind-reader or otherwise like a prophet of God! You can bet he was a good psychoanalyst as well, it's all part of the package of being an electromagnetic avant garde.

You really think Ross Tucker a sports scientist has any technical ability to interpret and give insight for creating a futuristic spaceship with electropropulsion on Edwin H. Hall (American Journal of Math, Vol ii [1879], p. 287) about an electromagnetic experiment with a gold-foil covered ebonite disk in a magnetic field despite 1 entire year of diligent study? Or do you think Edwin H Hall would have effortlessly given insight about high-performance physiology or human biology after only 1 hour of introduction to it?

It's easier to master and give insight about sports science in limited time than master avant garde electromagnetic physics in infinite time because the former science and philosophy is a farmer's league compared to the true elites in the latter!!! It's so easy for me to come onto LRC, therefore, and 'insult' everybody's knowledge including all the 'best' coaches on here but I will be schooled completely if I were to go to a forum reserved for avant garde electromagnetic Physicists!!!

Oh the World Wide Web. I believe everything I can confirm with google. Sure I'll scan all those URLs in my own time, in "wait-and-see" mode.

The "goes both ways" means that none of these electromagnetic scientists seem to have looked at sport performance, by your own admission. Wake me up when capability turns into reality in the past tense.

I don't know why you are talking to me about Ross Tucker. Why not just tell me who is talking about both RF/EMF and sport performance, rather than telling me who you think can and cannot.

Well,,,,, wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

The whole point of another authority supporting what you say is to remove you as a potential filter causing distortion. For this purpose, pretend no one believes you are the expert (because this is an anonymous forum and you cannot be authenticated with an anonymous handle), and then try to convince us based on what other authenticated authorities in the RF and EMF fields are saying about biology and distance running and irradiated blood.

I don't want you to tell me what Renato said, but show me where he said it, in context. I don't want to meet you face to face, but tell me where I can find some other authority in your field saying that RF and EMF electrocution is making distance runners slower. Otherwise you stand alone.

Not sure what you want to say about hematocrit, or what you think Renato said, but in a 1997 altitude study, the athletes living at altitude increased red cell mass volume (in ml/kg) by about 9% after 4 weeks at altitude.

Renato also said that extended altitude training helps sea-level athletes, like Sondre Moens.

I can't believe you bothered to reply to this complete crackpot.

rekrunner wrote:

Khamis wrote:

Look again, dear rekrunner, since you sounded slightly more sincere in your request for an EMF expert whether doctor or scientist who looks actively into the effects on high-performance due to anthropogenic RF and EMF exposures, let me offer you the wonderful CHRISTIAN-BASED JESUS-LOVING Colorado medical doctor Dr Jill Carnahan right .

Link:www.jillcarnahan.com/2023/09/20/how-do...

There are a few more in the European, Oceania, Asian, and Canadian continents but let's focus on the American continent for now. If you can do me a favor, get Yared Nuguse an appointment with this wonderful lady doctor since he lives and trains in Colorado as well. I assure you that Yared will put to sleep Jakob in both the mile and 1500m, and then turn Christian Amen!

I am always sincere in my requests for data and information. I appreciate the effort.

Did you say that the science is 100 years in the making, and not premature and a work in progress?

I see a lot of areas for potential damage and research opportunities -- mainly a lot of questions and maybes with very few answers.

Khamis wrote:

Dear rekrunner, I hope I have whet your appetite on not the endless potential research possibilities for high-performance sport with RF and EMF but what is already a beyond forgone conclusion about an actual causation between the both of them!

It's 2024 today. The first scientific forays into the health effects of anthropogenic RF and EMF was around 1930 while the first complaints about the same health effects was almost immediately after the introduction of the light bulb and electricity in the 1870s and 1880s. More sophisticated forays into health effects came after WWII from the 1940s and 50s onwards just before the Cold War and continued intensifying throughout it. We have therefore a grand total of at least 90 years of actual scientific and medical development in this area despite what is claimed otherwise in the corrupt media, and more than 140 years of complaints from the human population. Joe Biden or Rishi Sunak are those types of men or figures who will likely tell you 'oh it's nothing to worry it's safe and healthy', or 'the research is only a decade old and more research is needed'.

Also in the realm of RF and EMF, due to its powerful existential nature, you never treat a 'maybe' as a 'maybe'. Conventional ways of operating and thinking about 'maybe' do not ever work with powerful existential entities like RF and EMF. A 'maybe' in RF and EMF is worth no less than a '100%' in the affirmative because the advantage lies with existence rather than non-existence!!! The advantage always lies with 'benefit of the doubt' rather than 'no benefit of the doubt'. Where there is doubt in RF and EMF, it is automatically always safe to assume in the affirmative rather than in the disaffirmative.

RF and EMF is just so core, so central to human creation, human consciousness and human existence that all human research and experimentation that casts doubt or wants to deny its temporality on our existence is automatically always pretentious and falsifiable without further ado!

rekrunner wrote:

Khamis wrote:

Dear rekrunner, I hope I have whet your appetite on not the endless potential research possibilities for high-performance sport with RF and EMF but what is already a beyond forgone conclusion about an actual causation between the both of them!

It's 2024 today. The first scientific forays into the health effects of anthropogenic RF and EMF was around 1930 while the first complaints about the same health effects was almost immediately after the introduction of the light bulb and electricity in the 1870s and 1880s. More sophisticated forays into health effects came after WWII from the 1940s and 50s onwards just before the Cold War and continued intensifying throughout it. We have therefore a grand total of at least 90 years of actual scientific and medical development in this area despite what is claimed otherwise in the corrupt media, and more than 140 years of complaints from the human population. Joe Biden or Rishi Sunak are those types of men or figures who will likely tell you 'oh it's nothing to worry it's safe and healthy', or 'the research is only a decade old and more research is needed'.

Also in the realm of RF and EMF, due to its powerful existential nature, you never treat a 'maybe' as a 'maybe'. Conventional ways of operating and thinking about 'maybe' do not ever work with powerful existential entities like RF and EMF. A 'maybe' in RF and EMF is worth no less than a '100%' in the affirmative because the advantage lies with existence rather than non-existence!!! The advantage always lies with 'benefit of the doubt' rather than 'no benefit of the doubt'. Where there is doubt in RF and EMF, it is automatically always safe to assume in the affirmative rather than in the disaffirmative.

RF and EMF is just so core, so central to human creation, human consciousness and human existence that all human research and experimentation that casts doubt or wants to deny its temporality on our existence is automatically always pretentious and falsifiable without further ado!

I don't doubt the existence of RF and EMF and the existence of research surrounding it.

But you are jumping to conclusions about how much damage it is doing and that it is significantly impacting athletic performance, which seems to exceed the boundaries of the existance of what has been studied in the last 90-140 years.

I just note that in the last 90-140 years, athletes have only gotten faster, despite the increase in exposure to RF and EMF.