Awsi Dooger wrote:
The contradictions around here are laughable. Everybody says that basic training at sea level isn't good enough. Yet when someone at sea level undertakes a different approach than mile after monotonous mile, it is condemned and considered dubious.
There have been countless studies on the immense benefits of swimming, how it improves the body in more ways than other sports. It didn't require 35 seconds to find this:
"Lung capacity is a key indicator of athletic performance (as anyone gasping through a hard workout can attest) and swimming is at the top of the pile when it comes to improving lung volume and strength.
Research has borne out the superior lung power that comes with swimming. One paper found that elite swimmers scored significantly higher in pulmonary function compared to football players.
Another paper examined the difference between swimmers and middle-distance runners and found the swimmers had markedly stronger lungs.
Regular swim training can be used to increase pulmonary function and help you breathe better and stronger out on the road.”
Regarding “lung capacity”, it is also “breathing power”. That gal I trained with said the swim coaches employed restrictive air breathing devices (can’t remember…maybe it was some type of training snorkel with a restrictive air passage.)
In one of Valby’s post-race interviews, she says the Arc Trainer is analogous to a swimmer training with a swim-vest for increased resistance. She said running the hills was easier than what she does on the Arc Trainer.