Go visit Norway.....then decide if you think it´s possible that J.I is doping.
He's doping alright.And so are the other top norwegian athletes.
jeff, it is remarkable the extent to which you furnish evidence to substantiate your assertions. In post after post, day after day, week after week, month after month, the same magnificence expresses itself. Should anyone dare to call you lazy or someone who merely asserts without offering evidence, a simple "No" from you will be the expected ripost, thus cementing your well-earned reputation.
He's doping alright.And so are the other top norwegian athletes.
jeff, it is remarkable the extent to which you furnish evidence to substantiate your assertions. In post after post, day after day, week after week, month after month, the same magnificence expresses itself. Should anyone dare to call you lazy or someone who merely asserts without offering evidence, a simple "No" from you will be the expected ripost, thus cementing your well-earned reputation.
Well considering i have absolutely no idea who you are( you must be instantly forgettable),i think you need to find better things to do than criticise my comments.A simple "go away" from me to you,will suffice......
When you say an all out mile the day before has “zero effect” on your running the next day you are simply ignorant. You wouldn’t know what the impact is and so you really should stay quiet about this. Maybe you have no idea what an all out mile really is because you cannot push yourself very hard, but more likely you are slightly impacted the next day but because you are generally clueless you make assumptions about zero impact because your mind is not capable of acknowledging what you don’t know.
That's not much of answer. That last run-on sentence is just a semi-literate insult mostly. Go work on your writing skills, then come back and try to answer the question.
Anyone else? I have run an all out mile many times. I'd most of us here have. It's been many years, but I don't recall ever never noticing an affect the next day. It's one mile. How wrecked can you be the next day, no matter how much you pushed it? Do these guys running world record times have a different kind of recovery?
As you’re clearly not a mathematician, I‘ll teach you the principle of proof by contradiction.
If we assume that running an all-out mile has no effect on your performance the next day, then that next day you could run an all-out mile and the day after that you still wouldn’t be impacted from the mile the day before. And the following day, you still wouldn’t be impacted and could keep running to your maximum ability.
And you could keep doing this for 100 years and feel no cumulative impact of the previous days’ efforts. Because if there was a day in there that your performance dropped off, that would violate our initial assumption. Since this is clearly not the case, our original assumption must not be valid, so there is not zero impact the day after running an all-out mile.
Yeah I don’t believe that. He’s indicated in some interviews that he thinks the 3k/2 mile is a sweet spot for him and that the 5,000 is also great for given his training. But have not heard that about the 10K.
Make no mistake he can destroy the 10,000 WR as well.
That's not much of answer. That last run-on sentence is just a semi-literate insult mostly. Go work on your writing skills, then come back and try to answer the question.
Anyone else? I have run an all out mile many times. I'd most of us here have. It's been many years, but I don't recall ever never noticing an affect the next day. It's one mile. How wrecked can you be the next day, no matter how much you pushed it? Do these guys running world record times have a different kind of recovery?
As you’re clearly not a mathematician, I‘ll teach you the principle of proof by contradiction.
If we assume that running an all-out mile has no effect on your performance the next day, then that next day you could run an all-out mile and the day after that you still wouldn’t be impacted from the mile the day before. And the following day, you still wouldn’t be impacted and could keep running to your maximum ability.
And you could keep doing this for 100 years and feel no cumulative impact of the previous days’ efforts. Because if there was a day in there that your performance dropped off, that would violate our initial assumption. Since this is clearly not the case, our original assumption must not be valid, so there is not zero impact the day after running an all-out mile.
Completely absurd premise. "If we assume that running an all-out mile has no effect on your performance the next day." You can't, not even for two days, yet you persist for 100 years. I just taught you the principle of false premise = false conclusion.
Just a reminder that this is the most impressive double in modern history. Bekele's XC doubles don't compare, sorry. Josh Kerr could never.
I have to say that looking back, now you could definitely make an argument for Jakob running 7:17 3 days after his controlled 3:27.83 in Lausanne as being more impressive. Although I guess in 2024 he had better / longer pacing.
Just a reminder that this is the most impressive double in modern history. Bekele's XC doubles don't compare, sorry. Josh Kerr could never.
Not sure why xc wouldn't count from that era. It was very serious unlike today. But Bekele has something Jakob doesn't - double olympic gold from the same olympics.
Just a reminder that this is the most impressive double in modern history. Bekele's XC doubles don't compare, sorry. Josh Kerr could never.
Not sure why xc wouldn't count from that era. It was very serious unlike today. But Bekele has something Jakob doesn't - double olympic gold from the same olympics.
Nobody has run a double like Jakob’s in modern history. Multiple runners have won double Olympic Gold.