all you have to do is not be a bigot. Pretty simple for most people. Also why are you people so fixated on people ramming things in your face? projection?
Is it bigotry to believe that some sexual behaviors are discordant with the purposes of sex? Nearly everybody who lived before, say, the 20th century, believed that same sex acts were wrong. Were all those folks bigots? I don't think so. I think many had at least an inkling that sex is ordered or directed toward making babies and toward bonding. Put differently, they at least somewhat understood that sex has a procreative and a unitive function. And even the ancient Greeks who accepted pederasty did not equate a same-sex couple with a married couple.
It's ridiculous the ease with which what used to be harsh words such as "bigot," "hater," "racist," "sexist," etc., are hurled these days, and you mussibini gave another example.
Nearly everybody who lived before the 19th century believed that slavery was acceptable (except the slaves of course). Were all those folks wrong? Yes.
Nearly everybody who lived before the 19th century believed that slavery was acceptable (except the slaves of course). Were all those folks wrong? Yes.
Nearly everyone that lived before the 19th century believed stealing, murder, fraud, corruption, vandalism, and about 100 other things were not acceptable... were they wrong? no
"durr if you believe something in the past it MUST BE wRonG becAuSE it Was thE pasT!! Got you!!!"
Wayne Brady and the press decide to make a headline to get attention. They expect to the get the exact reaction they want. When they get a different one, it's "why do you care? you protest too much". I care because it's a national story because they made it one. No one is owed the reaction they think they should have from everybody
Nearly everybody who lived before the 19th century believed that slavery was acceptable (except the slaves of course). Were all those folks wrong? Yes.
Nearly everyone that lived before the 19th century believed stealing, murder, fraud, corruption, vandalism, and about 100 other things were not acceptable... were they wrong? no
"durr if you believe something in the past it MUST BE wRonG becAuSE it Was thE pasT!! Got you!!!"
Murder results in the death of another human being, stealing and vandalism result in the damaging or taking of someone else's property, fraud and corruption involves taking advantage of other people for personal profit. Meanwhile, consensual sex between two human beings, regardless of gender, results in their personal happiness, and has no other impact on anybody else. Your analogy is completely ridiculous. Please explain to me how consensual sex between two human beings is similar to killing someone.
Is it bigotry to believe that some sexual behaviors are discordant with the purposes of sex? Nearly everybody who lived before, say, the 20th century, believed that same sex acts were wrong. Were all those folks bigots? I don't think so.
"Many people in America who lived before the 20th century thought that black people were inherently inferior. Were all those folks bigots??? I don't think so."
In theory Bi = 2 (usually male and female) while Pan = all (male, female, non-binary). Regardless of your sexual identity there are really only two when it comes to actual intimacy as far as I can tell so I'm not sure the two are functionally any different.
My question is who would a pan sexual have sex with that a bi-sexual wouldn't? I'm serious, not being mean. I support whatever anyone wants to be but I'm not sure what the FUNCTIONAL difference between the two is.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.