For the record, RR, one may disagree with you and even find your occasional histrionics unpalatable at times without necessarily being misogynistic, just as I may not like a particular black person without necessarily being racist, and I presume that you know this.
Sure, but I’ve never seen RR post in a thread that’s not about transgender issues.
She calls people “mate” and refers to the “loo”, so I’m thinking she lives overseas. Why would she care about transgender rules for HS and college sports in the U.S.?
I post on LRC a lot because it gives me a real kick to see how negatively some male posters react
Internet trolling is a very exciting hobby, you must be fun at parties.
Finally, I post on LRC a lot because it gives me a real kick to see how negatively some male posters react to a woman being knowledgable and having views different to theirs - and in some cases, to see how some fellas react negatively to a woman having and voicing views at all.
Ha ha ha ha, this delusion of being knowledgeable and speaking for all womankind is pretty funny.
I post in threads about other topics too. But you see me a lot in threads about males in women's sports and spaces because my main interest and expertise is in women's rights, broadly speaking (ha ha) - and in doing my bit to continue women's centuries-long battle against sexism, sex discrimination, sex stereotypes, male entitlement, male violence against women and girls, and male supremacy and domination of us.
I have never seen a single post by you on threads where Title IX is attacked as a reason for all the problems with men's college sports other than football and basketball.
I have never seen a single post by you on threads where women's basketball, soccer, tennis, or any other sports are ridiculed for one reason or another.
But I guess your interests in women's rights are pretty "broad" otherwise.
Finally, I post on LRC a lot because it gives me a real kick to see how negatively some male posters react to a woman being knowledgable and having views different to theirs - and in some cases, to see how some fellas react negatively to a woman having and voicing views at all.
Ha ha ha ha, this delusion of being knowledgeable and speaking for all womankind is pretty funny.
Oh mate, give it up. You never contribute anything except peurile ad hominems and gibberish.
Also, I never said I speak for all womankind on this thread or on any other. I never would.
In the sentence you quoted above, I specifically spoke in the singular by saying "a woman" - twice.
Women are half the adult human population - there are billions of us on earth this very moment. Some women agree with me about the topics I discuss on LRC, plenty others don't. Just like I agree with some other women, and I'm at loggerheads with others.
I don't know any women who would presume to "speak for all womankind." In fact, I don't know many who'd use the term "womankind" at all. I think using the word "womankind" makes a person sound officious, affected, archaic, supercilious, conceited, "high horsey" and like a numpty or nitwit at the same time. But that's just me.
For the record, RR, one may disagree with you and even find your occasional histrionics unpalatable at times without necessarily being misogynistic, just as I may not like a particular black person without necessarily being racist, and I presume that you know this.
This argument is stupid because Lia is basically playing at people's politeness. Eventually they are just going to say, no, you're not a woman, not here or in anything. It's really quite simple.
Ha ha ha ha, this delusion of being knowledgeable and speaking for all womankind is pretty funny.
Oh mate, give it up. You never contribute anything except peurile ad hominems and gibberish.
Also, I never said I speak for all womankind on this thread or on any other. I never would.
In the sentence you quoted above, I specifically spoke in the singular by saying "a woman" - twice.
Women are half the adult human population - there are billions of us on earth this very moment. Some women agree with me about the topics I discuss on LRC, plenty others don't. Just like I agree with some other women, and I'm at loggerheads with others.
I don't know any women who would presume to "speak for all womankind." In fact, I don't know many who'd use the term "womankind" at all. I think using the word "womankind" makes a person sound officious, affected, archaic, supercilious, conceited, "high horsey" and like a numpty or nitwit at the same time. But that's just me.
We don’t attribute your transphobia and airheadedness to being a woman, just to being you.
Has anyone ever approached Will Thomas and really asked him why he thinks he's a woman? Some pervert probably got ahold of him at a young age and messed him up. He's an Ivy Leaguer, huge percentages of degenerates run in those circles in the Northeast.
Ha ha ha ha, this delusion of being knowledgeable and speaking for all womankind is pretty funny.
Oh mate, give it up. You never contribute anything except peurile ad hominems and gibberish.
Also, I never said I speak for all womankind on this thread or on any other. I never would.
In the sentence you quoted above, I specifically spoke in the singular by saying "a woman" - twice.
Women are half the adult human population - there are billions of us on earth this very moment. Some women agree with me about the topics I discuss on LRC, plenty others don't. Just like I agree with some other women, and I'm at loggerheads with others.
I don't know any women who would presume to "speak for all womankind." In fact, I don't know many who'd use the term "womankind" at all. I think using the word "womankind" makes a person sound officious, affected, archaic, supercilious, conceited, "high horsey" and like a numpty or nitwit at the same time. But that's just me.
“Finally, I post on LRC a lot because it gives me a real kick to see how negatively some male transphobic verbose posters react…”
Has anyone ever approached Will Thomas and really asked him why he thinks he's a woman? Some pervert probably got ahold of him at a young age and messed him up. He's an Ivy Leaguer, huge percentages of degenerates run in those circles in the Northeast.
So is it your theory that transgenders are caused by being victims of perverts?
Oh mate, give it up. You never contribute anything except peurile ad hominems and gibberish.
Also, I never said I speak for all womankind on this thread or on any other. I never would.
…
I don't know any women who would presume to "speak for all womankind." In fact, I don't know many who'd use the term "womankind" at all. I think using the word "womankind" makes a person sound officious, affected, archaic, supercilious, conceited, "high horsey" and like a numpty or nitwit at the same time. But that's just me.
Such a dishonest tactic to label anyone who disagrees with biological males competing against women as haters.
I hate that women are victimized by biological males infiltrating their competitions, but I don’t hate the biological males.
I'll tell you what I don't like: the so-called justice warriors who stare unblinking and say that these men are women on the basis of their wanting to be women. They ignore science yet claim they sagely following the science. They reject biology and pretend that with some drug use they can fit into the biology (I wonder: if a trans person can take drugs to come down into the markers of the category, is it possible for the REAL women to to take drugs to reach the top of the markers? Hmmm). And for the dudes that support this BS, I wonder if they would have "relations" with Lia, ya know, because he hasn't had his package removed. Doubtful.
Has anyone ever approached Will Thomas and really asked him why he thinks he's a woman? Some pervert probably got ahold of him at a young age and messed him up. He's an Ivy Leaguer, huge percentages of degenerates run in those circles in the Northeast.
So is it your theory that transgenders are caused by being victims of perverts?
Yep, I think a large percentage of young people that think they are trannies or gay or whatever were negatively impacted by interactions with adults in their childhood, often in an illegal and exploitative fashion. Couple that with the constant bombardment of social media affirmation and you get the massive increases in kids thinking they are something they aren't.
So is it your theory that transgenders are caused by being victims of perverts?
Yep, I think a large percentage of young people that think they are trannies or gay or whatever were negatively impacted by interactions with adults in their childhood, often in an illegal and exploitative fashion. Couple that with the constant bombardment of social media affirmation and you get the massive increases in kids thinking they are something they aren't.
Hmmmm. Who have we heard this line of reasoning about before?
I'm kinda wondering if Lia and Dylan are just putting us on. All an act. Lia looks like he's trying to hold in a laugh.
Lia proably has autogynephilia (a sexual fetish in which a man is aroused and falls in love with the idea of a female self/body). I also suspect Lia is narcissistic or psychopathic.
Yep, I think a large percentage of young people that think they are trannies or gay or whatever were negatively impacted by interactions with adults in their childhood, often in an illegal and exploitative fashion. Couple that with the constant bombardment of social media affirmation and you get the massive increases in kids thinking they are something they aren't.
Hmmmm. Who have we heard this line of reasoning about before?
I know somebody who did a study of trans-identified females (actual females who transitioned to live as men), and she found that many of her research subjects had experienced childhood sexual abuse and felt disgusted by their female bodies. Many were also on the autism spectrum, but that connection is pretty well established.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.