Are you serious? I don't have to account for anything about SafeSport and I do believe Kara Goucher did not tell the truth. The SafeSport investigation and their decision is not a court of law. Try a real courtroom and see how far she gets.
Where's her lawsuit against Alberto? Trust me, Kara knows that she'll be put in the hot seat. The questions that I laid out in my post are nothing compared to what a sharp defense attorney would do.
Salazar can put in writing that he categorically denies Kara Goucher's accusations. Why does her words in a book trump Alberto's words?
I saw an interview on YouTube with a police officer that was accused of doing something "strange" in his vehicle while watching a lady at an ATM machine. She got part of the license plate number and the vehicle type. She immediately went to the police station and as she was walking in, she saw the truck with 3 of the numbers or letters that she remembered in the police parking lot. She wasn't touched by the guy or even had a conversation with him, but she went right to the police station.
The Officer was being interviewed and his commander said you've done some very strange things on your part, implying that an innocent person wouldn't do the things he did. One thing was that he found out through her police report that the lady saw his vehicle so he had his plates changed and his logic for doing so made zero sense.
Why the above example? Kara's timing of doing things and not doing things makes very little sense to an unbiased person. Not going to the police? You can try to justify her reasons, but...they make no sense. I personally think she was mad at Alberto and wanted to get back at him. Yes, I could be wrong, but if you believe her because of what she wrote in her book, you could be wrong too. Then in your mind you are convicting what could possibly be an innocent person. Is that fair?
You can't convict Alberto based on someone's word years later, especially after her email. That just doesn't sit too well with me.