No denying this is a very weak NY year. You should check out the results from 2019 and prior though. NXRNY and NXRNE are run on the same course back to back. NY boys and girls in every single year from 2010-2019 always places one and typically places both of their teams in front of both NE teams. Your statement would actually only be accurate if you described this year as the one off. If the NE and NY combined, you would only rarely see a team outside of NY qualify, and the majority of the time would have a minimum of one NY team qualifying for the boys.
-
11
-
Nonya wrote:
No denying this is a very weak NY year. You should check out the results from 2019 and prior though. NXRNY and NXRNE are run on the same course back to back. NY boys and girls in every single year from 2010-2019 always places one and typically places both of their teams in front of both NE teams. Your statement would actually only be accurate if you described this year as the one off. If the NE and NY combined, you would only rarely see a team outside of NY qualify, and the majority of the time would have a minimum of one NY team qualifying for the boys.
Wonder how Burnt Hills would have done in 2017 is they were healthy and qualified. FM placed 2nd. Corning did well. Burnt Hills were highly ranked sometimes that year
00 -
Carroll boys team had a 25 second 1-5 spread at NXR
00 -
dwearsh wrote:
Carroll boys team had a 25 second 1-5 spread at NXR
Guess nobody else wanted to have some fun in the mud.
10 -
Nonya wrote:
No denying this is a very weak NY year. You should check out the results from 2019 and prior though. NXRNY and NXRNE are run on the same course back to back. NY boys and girls in every single year from 2010-2019 always places one and typically places both of their teams in front of both NE teams. Your statement would actually only be accurate if you described this year as the one off. If the NE and NY combined, you would only rarely see a team outside of NY qualify, and the majority of the time would have a minimum of one NY team qualifying for the boys.
But the question is what at large spots are being denied teams from the other regions because NE-NY are potentially hogging 8 possible spots. NY is in the northeast and should run in that region.
20 -
50
-
Bro there are no at larges there
02 -
Huh didn't think girls side was strong enough to get 2 at larges after State results, but I guess JSerra not being there would have been weird since they beat a few NXN teams.
20 -
slfknds wrote:
Bro there are no at larges there
AT-LARGE TEAM QUALIFIERS
BOYS TEAMS
San Clemente (CA)
Mountain View (UT)
Downers North (IL)
Livermore (CA)
GIRLS TEAMS
Flower Mound (TX)
Moraga (CA)
Academy (CO)
San Juan Capistrano (CA)50 -
fasterthanyourmom wrote:
Who here is refreshing this page, NXN and Milesplit every minute? What is taking so long? Fingers crossed for...
I always thought it was Selection Sunday.
00 -
Hobby10k wrote:
Huh didn't think girls side was strong enough to get 2 at larges after State results, but I guess JSerra not being there would have been weird since they beat a few NXN teams.
Who was snubbed on the girls side do you think?
10 -
Wow 8 CA teams will be at NXN
50 -
Guys side was wild, you have the best team in the nation as your #1, then each of the next 3 teams has a win against each other. Granada beat SC and GO at Woodbridge, SC beat Granada and GO at Clovis, and now GO beats both teams at state. This gets all 3 teams to nationals.
70 -
We also have to remember that:
NP, Great Oak and Granada were all top 10 in the nation preseason.
Great Oak’s summer time trial was better this year than last year, and they got 7th in the nation last year
21 -
Newbury Park boys - number of seniors in the top 7
2017- 2 seniors
2018- 2 seniors
2019- 2 seniors
2020- 2 seniors
2021- 2 seniors
2022- 5 seniors. Would have been 6 if Martinez was still on the team
10 -
Livermore must be a mistake, as far as I can tell there is only one Livermore in the nation and they are from California but they didn’t qualify for state and don’t even have any runners sub 19
12 -
Livermore is Granada High School’s club name. They are located in Livermore
50 -
That explains it 🤦♂️I gotta agree with you that Rocky was snubbed, they had probably the worst race of their season and still were only 28 points out of an auto-bid. Downers North was 23 points out and I think most would consider NW to be a stronger region than MW
13 -
Trhsbaddies wrote:
That explains it 🤦♂️I gotta agree with you that Rocky was snubbed, they had probably the worst race of their season and still were only 28 points out of an auto-bid. Downers North was 23 points out and I think most would consider NW to be a stronger region than MW
Yeah being only 28 points behind a top 5 team in the nation really showed they would do a lot of damage at NXN. Rocky Should have gotten in for sure. But the fact that they did so well this year after losing 4 varsity seniors, makes me think they deserve credit for building up the team from what they had
10 -
dwearsh wrote:
Wow 8 CA teams will be at NXN
5 Illinois teams.
York girls are a proven team having taken 4th at RunningLane and Prospect is slightly better so I'm guessing top 10 for both. Weather in the area has been decent enough to get consistent training over the last 3 weeks so they should be ready if prepared properly. (Illinois teams cannot have athlete/coach contact after state meet)
Boys, DGN and HC have been to the dance, but DGN has made it now 3 of the last 5 meets, the other 2 years there was no meet. HC has simply improved every race since mid October and has taken over as the best Illinois team. Plainfield is a little question, not a big team or historically nationally relevant but they did show at Nike and State they have 7 strong runners and a nice 1-5 pack.
00
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.