The standard you apply to athletes from African nations versus non-African nations when interpreting doping and performance. Compare your opinion of and statements for Ingebrigtsen and Wightman to Timothy Cheruiyot, with respect to talent and doping.
It looks like maybe you went through this by making up these numbers to deepen your conviction of your own self-delusion. Assuming 200 busts in Kenya since 2004, you suggest that only 1 USA, German, and GB has been busted in that same timeframe? In 2019 alone, Germany had 4 ADRVs and USA had 7.
In a Sunday Times report on a large collection of blood samples from 2001-2012, GB was 4% "suspicious", Germany was 6%, Ethiopia 8%, and Kenya 11%. The worldwide average was 14%. That's for EPO and blood doping, which you think explains Kenya's rise to dominance as far back as 1987. Similarly in three IAAF studies covering 2001-2008, 2011 and 2013, assuming letsrun sleuths are correct with identifying countries, Kenya and Ethiopia were usually around average, and always far behind Russia.
It's odd, but consistent that you have convinced yourself and continue with the delusion that I have defended Beyer, despite my many corrections. What was my defense? My "defense" was pointing out that your made up claims of "potentially lethal" and "banned substance" were not supported and/or contradicted by the article you linked. I don't condone breaking German law, and I said he should be punished for breaking the law. He was, and paid a small fine, proportionate to the severity of the offense.
I don't really know anything about Pineda, and don't see any relation to a 21-year old runner dropping dead and a Swedish runner popped for EPO. What was my alleged defense here?
