Over 70% of liberals believe Simpson was set up by half a dozen racist white cops. Some things never change.
Bullsh!t to that!
I am a liberal, and I know he did it. It is generally accepted that Simpson murdered those two people by pretty much everyone. I don't know a single person, liberal or not, who believes he is innocent of that crime.
In real life a 47 year old former pro footballer killed two people with a knife. That was the conclusion of a jury.
If your theory was correct we wouldn't see any knife homicides perpetrated by anyone in their forties or older - because they are physically unable. You would be wrong. There are knife homicides committed by those far older than Simpson was.
I am over twenty years older that Simpson was then. Even though I am not a former pro footballer it wouldn't be physically difficult to use a knife against someone who wasn't expecting to be attacked. A sharp blade penetrates flesh very easily - as you will have found when accidentally cutting yourself in the kitchen.
Juries can be wrong sometimes. As far older people committing murders, it depends on circumstances. Was the victim asleep or drunk, didn't seen the knife until it was too late. Normally there is big struggle as people have a habit to not want to die or simply run away from you when they see a knife. It is not easy to simply overpower people and stab them. Especially people in top physical shape.
1) Ron Goldman was a soccer and tennis player in high school. No football, no wrestling.
2) O.J. Simpson had world-class speed, played professional football, made other professional football players look like children on the field (first 2,000-yard rusher in NFL history).
3) Professional athletes, compared to normal people, are not human. A professional athlete can do things that have to be seen to be believed. Television does not do justice to the abilities of professional athletes. Seeing professional athletes compete against OTHER professional athletes does not do justice to the abilities of professional athletes. O.J. Simpson was a freak of nature even compared to other professional athletes.
4) Sprinters are extremely strong. Sprinters are extremely quick. Extremely = incomprehensibly.
5) Football players, all good football players (even on the high school level), are completely comfortable in a fight. They’ve been hit, and hit hard, hundreds of times. The good ones LIKE fighting. The great ones LOVE fighting. (Many football players simply don’t fight because they are afraid of what they can do to their opponent -- but believe me, they aren’t afraid of physical conflict on any level.
6) Conclusion: Believe what you want about Simpson’s guilt, but here is one FACT: Ron Goldman would have stood zero chance against an armed O.J. Simpson (even at 47). ZERO. THREE Ron Goldmans would have stood ZERO chance.
If you are basing a conclusion that O.J. is innocent of the murder of two people on any belief that O.J. was not physically capable of killing two people, you are living in a fantasy world.
How can at a time 47 year old O.J with a bad knee take down two significantly younger physically fit people? Nicole was 35 years old and ran 9 miles a day, Ron Goldman was 25 years old and reportedly a black belt in karate. It just doesn't add up.
I’ll take the 47 year old ex NFLer with a very sharp knife, who preplanned a surprise attack.
How did he do that?
How did he know where and when Nicole and her boy toy would be?
Over 70% of liberals believe Simpson was set up by half a dozen racist white cops. Some things never change.
Bullsh!t to that!
I am a liberal, and I know he did it. It is generally accepted that Simpson murdered those two people by pretty much everyone. I don't know a single person, liberal or not, who believes he is innocent of that crime.
You don't know that.
You believe it.
I think there is a small chance he did not do it. Also a chance he did not do it alone
There are reports that OJ would spy on his ex from time to time and that is likely why he went to her condo that evening. Him finding her with another guy set him off and he carved the two of them up.
The thought that he would not be physically able to disable both of them pretty quickly is pretty stupid.
1) Ron Goldman was a soccer and tennis player in high school. No football, no wrestling.
2) O.J. Simpson had world-class speed, played professional football, made other professional football players look like children on the field (first 2,000-yard rusher in NFL history).
3) Professional athletes, compared to normal people, are not human. A professional athlete can do things that have to be seen to be believed. Television does not do justice to the abilities of professional athletes. Seeing professional athletes compete against OTHER professional athletes does not do justice to the abilities of professional athletes. O.J. Simpson was a freak of nature even compared to other professional athletes.
4) Sprinters are extremely strong. Sprinters are extremely quick. Extremely = incomprehensibly.
5) Football players, all good football players (even on the high school level), are completely comfortable in a fight. They’ve been hit, and hit hard, hundreds of times. The good ones LIKE fighting. The great ones LOVE fighting. (Many football players simply don’t fight because they are afraid of what they can do to their opponent -- but believe me, they aren’t afraid of physical conflict on any level.
6) Conclusion: Believe what you want about Simpson’s guilt, but here is one FACT: Ron Goldman would have stood zero chance against an armed O.J. Simpson (even at 47). ZERO. THREE Ron Goldmans would have stood ZERO chance.
If you are basing a conclusion that O.J. is innocent of the murder of two people on any belief that O.J. was not physically capable of killing two people, you are living in a fantasy world.
All that may have been true when OJ was in his prime athletically and very likely at the time on roids. But we are talking about a washed up 47 year old with a shredded knee. It's not the same person.
There are reports that OJ would spy on his ex from time to time and that is likely why he went to her condo that evening. Him finding her with another guy set him off and he carved the two of them up.
The thought that he would not be physically able to disable both of them pretty quickly is pretty stupid.
If finding her with this guy set him off, then he had not planned this attack as you originally speculated.
There are reports that OJ would spy on his ex from time to time and that is likely why he went to her condo that evening. Him finding her with another guy set him off and he carved the two of them up.
The thought that he would not be physically able to disable both of them pretty quickly is pretty stupid.
If finding her with this guy set him off, then he had not planned this attack as you originally speculated.
Over 70% of liberals believe Simpson was set up by half a dozen racist white cops. Some things never change.
Bullsh!t to that!
I am a liberal, and I know he did it. It is generally accepted that Simpson murdered those two people by pretty much everyone. I don't know a single person, liberal or not, who believes he is innocent of that crime.
Are you 20 years old? At the time, the Simpson case verdict split the country on ideological grounds. Liberals cheered when he was acquitted, believing a gang of racist white cops had tried to frame another black man and the verdict was a vindication. Conservatives believed the jury was completely wrong and that there was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson was guilty. The Simpson case involved the media's earliest dabblings in Wokeism; endless liberal pundits telling us how wrong white people were for not seeing the systemic white racism incarcerating black people, especially successful ones.
I am a liberal, and I know he did it. It is generally accepted that Simpson murdered those two people by pretty much everyone. I don't know a single person, liberal or not, who believes he is innocent of that crime.
Are you 20 years old? At the time, the Simpson case verdict split the country on ideological grounds. Liberals cheered when he was acquitted, believing a gang of racist white cops had tried to frame another black man and the verdict was a vindication. Conservatives believed the jury was completely wrong and that there was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson was guilty. The Simpson case involved the media's earliest dabblings in Wokeism; endless liberal pundits telling us how wrong white people were for not seeing the systemic white racism incarcerating black people, especially successful ones.
For the most part the split was along racial lines and not political.
I am a liberal, and I know he did it. It is generally accepted that Simpson murdered those two people by pretty much everyone. I don't know a single person, liberal or not, who believes he is innocent of that crime.
Are you 20 years old? At the time, the Simpson case verdict split the country on ideological grounds. Liberals cheered when he was acquitted, believing a gang of racist white cops had tried to frame another black man and the verdict was a vindication. Conservatives believed the jury was completely wrong and that there was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson was guilty. The Simpson case involved the media's earliest dabblings in Wokeism; endless liberal pundits telling us how wrong white people were for not seeing the systemic white racism incarcerating black people, especially successful ones.
There's no truth to that at all.
The polls showed that the verdict might have split the nation along racial lines, but white liberals certainly did not think that OJ was innocent. CNN polling, which you can search for like I just did, showed that a large majority of white Americans thought he was guilty. Six in ten African Americans did not. Twenty years later polls showed that 53% of African Americans believed he did it. Nearly 90% of whites thought he was guilty by that time.
Are you 20 years old? At the time, the Simpson case verdict split the country on ideological grounds. Liberals cheered when he was acquitted, believing a gang of racist white cops had tried to frame another black man and the verdict was a vindication. Conservatives believed the jury was completely wrong and that there was evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson was guilty. The Simpson case involved the media's earliest dabblings in Wokeism; endless liberal pundits telling us how wrong white people were for not seeing the systemic white racism incarcerating black people, especially successful ones.
For the most part the split was along racial lines and not political.
At first there was no racial divide on this case.
But within a few days the NY Times ran a front page article that said something along the lines of "white people think this about the OJ case and blacks think this..".
Thus making sure there was a racial divide.
Personally I was a little surprised at how hard all the (white) people in my office took the verdict.
Are you 20 years old? At the time, the Simpson case verdict split the country on ideological grounds. Liberals cheered when he was acquitted, believing a gang of racist white cops had tried to frame another black man and the verdict was a vindication.
Nonsense. Just about everybody I hung out with at that time was liberal and exactly zero of them took his side or cheered when he was acquitted. Where did you get that from?
Are you 20 years old? At the time, the Simpson case verdict split the country on ideological grounds. Liberals cheered when he was acquitted, believing a gang of racist white cops had tried to frame another black man and the verdict was a vindication.
Nonsense. Just about everybody I hung out with at that time was liberal and exactly zero of them took his side or cheered when he was acquitted. Where did you get that from?
For many people, OJ’s blood being at the crime scene was game, set and match. His country club buddies all ditched him when the blood results became public.
Are you 20 years old? At the time, the Simpson case verdict split the country on ideological grounds. Liberals cheered when he was acquitted, believing a gang of racist white cops had tried to frame another black man and the verdict was a vindication.
Nonsense. Just about everybody I hung out with at that time was liberal and exactly zero of them took his side or cheered when he was acquitted. Where did you get that from?
Exactly. He too is insane... or trolling .. or grossly misinformed. [ or just likes to invent his own history].
Now a lotttt of black people [ not all] did cheer and support the verdict. Even though OJ had little contact with them. But they make up a small slice of the overall "liberals."
Maybe this guy, like Trump, also "remembers" all the Arabs/Muslims in NYC cheering and celebrating the twin towers collapse.
I am a liberal, and I know he did it. It is generally accepted that Simpson murdered those two people by pretty much everyone. I don't know a single person, liberal or not, who believes he is innocent of that crime.
You don't know that.
You believe it.
I think there is a small chance he did not do it. Also a chance he did not do it alone
I think there is a VERY small chance that you do not have some brain damage or mental disability. Like .01%.
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.
Fill out a review to be entered into a drawing to win a free pair of shoes.