John Glen Frey wrote:
The premise of the thread is disinfo. - it's the states that determine the panel of required childhood vaccines, not CDC
Not mandatory yet? It's in the CDC list of childhood vaccines.
-
34
-
NotFamiliaWithFDC wrote:
jc9091 wrote:
.....vaccines are not FDC approved.....
I am not familiar with the FDC. What is that?
Any guesses?
I would guess he meant the FDA.
31 -
John Glen Frey wrote:
The premise of the thread is disinfo. - it's the states that determine the panel of required childhood vaccines, not CDC
How do you think states decide what to mandate???
As someone who lives in a state that imposes mandates to enforce whatever the CDC comes up with, this is academic.
31 -
It’s really weird that you take joy in forcing parents to inject their children with a very ineffective medical intervention against their will. The reality is a reasonably healthy child has statistically almost no risk from covid. Any it doesn’t stop transmission. What on earth would posses you to take glee in mandating this on healthy children. It makes absolutely zero sense. I’ve seen your posts for a while. You either actually work for Pfizer or you are a sociopath. You are a truly disturbing individual.
131 -
In a pointed manner please show me the stats on healthy children’s overall risk from COVID. Not your glossed over tried and true, “everyone knows that…..” but a truly meaningful actual number. I respected you more when there were minimal studies with lacking data that pushed the vaccine. You’re honestly a shell of your former self in debates as more time goes by and more data comes out. You used to actually try. You’re living on royalties of a past understanding of COVID’s actual risk you bum.
72 -
Pure, unadulterated CHILD ABUSE for the sake of the dictatorship and profits.
92 -
I see the mass reporting of my posts has happened. Always happens when I prove thin-skinned people wrong.
Anyway the vaccine is proven risk:reward benefit for children. It's certainly better than the varicella vax and nobody complains about that one.
You guys will just have to face it: it's going to be mandated in schools and there's not much you can do. Homeschool sounds fun?
38 -
carmine9 wrote:
NotFamiliaWithFDC wrote:
I am not familiar with the FDC. What is that?
Any guesses?
I would guess he meant the FDA.
My apologies. It blows to be wrong.
10 -
kennyb2008 wrote:
Time5k wrote:
Myocarditis has been studied, in young kids it's basically a non-issue.
https
//Ages 5-11
Myocarditis after 1st dose
0 out of 238,000
After 2nd dose.
3 of 409,000
Booster
0 of 100,000
Total 3 cases out of 737,000 doses
Dude, this "study" draws conclusions like 2 minutes after the initial dose. The point is, no serious study should draw such a hard-and-fast conclusion from data that covers such a short period of time.
What length of time would someone of your expertise would be an appropriate period? You obviously have no idea of the mechanisms that cause myocarditis. It's not something that's going to materialize a year later.
22 -
kennyb2008 wrote:
Time5k wrote:
Myocarditis has been studied, in young kids it's basically a non-issue.
https
//Ages 5-11
Myocarditis after 1st dose
0 out of 238,000
After 2nd dose.
3 of 409,000
Booster
0 of 100,000
Total 3 cases out of 737,000 doses
Dude, this "study" draws conclusions like 2 minutes after the initial dose. The point is, no serious study should draw such a hard-and-fast conclusion from data that covers such a short period of time.
Another study, let me know what's flawed with this one.
01 -
O.p. and numerous posts throughout the thread are factually wrong
33 -
dumby wrote:
Thanks Marty! We did. We got exactly what we deserved which is a family without COVID!
Thanks
Just keep getting the shots. Each and every one they tell you to get. Statistically you’re likely to soon learn first hand why your handle is fitting.
50 -
Time5k wrote:
kennyb2008 wrote:
Dude, this "study" draws conclusions like 2 minutes after the initial dose. The point is, no serious study should draw such a hard-and-fast conclusion from data that covers such a short period of time.
Another study, let me know what's flawed with this one.
Clearly you do not understand the meaning of “long-term”.
21
7 posts were removed from this page.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.