Quite frankly, if you look into it, yes. The sole source for the "1 million Uyghurs" imprisoned figure was from a single source, Adrian Zenz. Eight people, I repeat, EIGHT people from a single prefecture were interviewed to extrapolate to the 1 million number we all know and love. The surveillance apparatus in Xinjiang and the Uyghur situation is reprehensible, but it's none of our business, especially considering the skeletons we have in our closet. The "forced separation of families" is just a mistranslation pulled in bad faith. The original passage in the Chinese document, again "translated" by Zenz, who doesn't speak nor read lick of Mandarin, was regarding government-subsidized daycare centers while parents worked. Somehow, that was twisted into "forced separation of families" because people like you are everywhere in American government, so they run with it because it fits the narrative. I know, I know, you want to call me a "Chinese shill" or "CCP agent" (or "wumao," if you're one of those types) really, really badly. Control yourself. Crucify me for being skeptical of US State Department narratives after the Gulf of Tonkin, the Nayirah Testimony, and the biggest lie of my generation, the WMDs in Iraq lie. Eat all of it up if you want to, but warmongering propaganda only serves the military industrial complex, and our taxes pay for it. If you want to be a useful idiot, then by all means do so. Parrot their talking points all you want. Your only reward is perpetual war that YOU pay for. Well, I'd end up paying for it as well, unfortunately.
As for Tibet, characterizing it as an invasion is an oversimplification. People like you love doing that for some reason. The CIA has admitted that 90% of Tibetans were pro-Chinese/Soviet liberation since it was a real slave state and a dictatorship. Read if you want to. We make a bigger deal out of Hong Kong for a lot less support for "liberation." That should tell you something about how, context be damned, on-the-ground truths are twisted before being fed to you via biased headlines.
It's not as cut and dry as "big bad country invades helpless victim country for no reason." They were adversarial empires for a long time. Unsurprisingly, you've simply parroted the US-approved version of the tale, which, yet again, further proves my point. Don't people like you ever get tired of parroting US State Department talking points over and over, especially since they fall apart under the lightest of scrutiny? It's sad.
Also, it's funny how you're supposedly so concerned about "forced suppression" of Tibetan culture, and the like. You should read up on how Native Americans were treated and how Native American children were basically targets of brainwashing to make them detest the blood in their veins, let alone the targets of continent-wide genocide. Tibetan schools still teach in Tibetan, by the way. Are Hawaiian schools taught in Hawaiian? Are schools built on the graves of the Cherokee taught in Cherokee? Who's concerned about "preserving culture," now?