The Democrat machines in Detroit, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, etc. held an emergency meeting at 3 a.m. on Tuesday night to figure out what is the correct number of manuactured Biden ballots to bring in for "Operation Ballot Drop."
The Democrat machines in Detroit, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, etc. held an emergency meeting at 3 a.m. on Tuesday night to figure out what is the correct number of manuactured Biden ballots to bring in for "Operation Ballot Drop."
just saying... wrote:
What evidence would convince you exactly?
There is no evidence that would convince cheaters they're not cheating.
They already know that they are.
voter suppression and fraud wrote:
or this wrote:
^^This
Thank you.
Says the genius who believes in the whole Russia hoax with President Trump and everything else CNN tells him.
Wrong.
But nice diversion to argumentum ad hominem to avoid the substance of the post.
How do you explain the lack of any credible evidence by anyone of widespread voter fraud in recent decades?
I'll ask again, specifically what type evidence would convince some of you of cheating? I'm confident nothing would convince you at this point. People have posted evidence and it just gets brushed off by discrediting the source. Is the fact that it is easy to find cases of dead people voting not evidence enough for you?
What about the fraud for Trump votes? None there, right???
Lame brain young people who don't have a clue what life is about. We have a better system than most countries. Talk about Russia the next time you want to talk fraud.
just saying... wrote:
I'll ask again, specifically what type evidence would convince some of you of cheating? I'm confident nothing would convince you at this point. People have posted evidence and it just gets brushed off by discrediting the source. Is the fact that it is easy to find cases of dead people voting not evidence enough for you?
I’ll tell you again - something not riddled with lies and irrelevancies like your other post.
just saying... wrote:
I'll ask again, specifically what type evidence would convince some of you of cheating? I'm confident nothing would convince you at this point. People have posted evidence and it just gets brushed off by discrediting the source. Is the fact that it is easy to find cases of dead people voting not evidence enough for you?
People screaming about fraud isn't actually evidence though sweetie.
It's just bad losers doing what they do.
Trump's got a 1000 lawyers on this and they can't come up with anything.
If the Democrats are actually cheating, isn't this just proof that they're so much more intelligent than the Republicans so it's probably better off having them in power anyway?
trollism wrote:
just saying... wrote:
I'll ask again, specifically what type evidence would convince some of you of cheating? I'm confident nothing would convince you at this point. People have posted evidence and it just gets brushed off by discrediting the source. Is the fact that it is easy to find cases of dead people voting not evidence enough for you?
People screaming about fraud isn't actually evidence though sweetie.
It's just bad losers doing what they do.
Trump's got a 1000 lawyers on this and they can't come up with anything.
If the Democrats are actually cheating, isn't this just proof that they're so much more intelligent than the Republicans so it's probably better off having them in power anyway?
Stop avoiding the question. What would you consider evidence of cheating?
the beagle wrote:
just saying... wrote:
I'll ask again, specifically what type evidence would convince some of you of cheating? I'm confident nothing would convince you at this point. People have posted evidence and it just gets brushed off by discrediting the source. Is the fact that it is easy to find cases of dead people voting not evidence enough for you?
I’ll tell you again - something not riddled with lies and irrelevancies like your other post.
Where is the lie in the OPs post? Or are you just saying it's a lie because you don't want it to be true?
just saying... wrote:
trollism wrote:
People screaming about fraud isn't actually evidence though sweetie.
It's just bad losers doing what they do.
Trump's got a 1000 lawyers on this and they can't come up with anything.
If the Democrats are actually cheating, isn't this just proof that they're so much more intelligent than the Republicans so it's probably better off having them in power anyway?
Stop avoiding the question. What would you consider evidence of cheating?
What have you got?
You're the one crying and screaming. You show me why you're so tearful.
Until you do, we'll just all presume it's because your messiah got demolished and now you're lost and don't know what to do.
trollism wrote:
just saying... wrote:
Stop avoiding the question. What would you consider evidence of cheating?
What have you got?
You're the one crying and screaming. You show me why you're so tearful.
Until you do, we'll just all presume it's because your messiah got demolished and now you're lost and don't know what to do.
Let's start with the fact that you can find dead people who have voted in Detroit. Why is that not evidence of fraud for you?
assuming that the Democrats did dump a whole lot of fake ballots (they didn't) how did they manage to make these legitimate given all the safe guards in place to stop fraudulent voting?
...or are you suggesting that the vote counters are in on this too.
just saying... wrote:
trollism wrote:
What have you got?
You're the one crying and screaming. You show me why you're so tearful.
Until you do, we'll just all presume it's because your messiah got demolished and now you're lost and don't know what to do.
Let's start with the fact that you can find dead people who have voted in Detroit. Why is that not evidence of fraud for you?
Right, so if you're talking about the one your messiah's son retweeted and got you all excited about, it was a mix up with his son. They've even spoken to him.
But if you're sure that's serious voter fraud in Michigan, you've got 1 vote cancelled. About 150k to go there....
Even Faux News is asking where's the beef. They just spent 5 minutes saying that there is no evidence that any fraud happened. They said they heard a lot of anger and passion but no evidence. The Repubicans in Georgia say they have seen no issues.
Give up.
Hillary called Trump personally to concede. Trump needs to sack up and accept the results.
campaigner wrote:
assuming that the Democrats did dump a whole lot of fake ballots (they didn't) how did they manage to make these legitimate given all the safe guards in place to stop fraudulent voting?
And why did they, other than for president, vote out democrats and vote for Repubicans on all those fake ballots they dumped?
just saying... wrote:
Stop avoiding the question. What would you consider evidence of cheating?
Sure, I'll answer since I asked for the evidence.
Here are some examples of acceptable evidence:
- Written reports from independent election observers (who would show their work)
- Video, emails, recorded conversations, or testimony showing that fraud happened and it's possible to corroborate (so it's not 1 guy or a small group making it up)
- An audit that uncovers voting irregularities (and which would be part of a report)
What is not acceptable evidence:
- One random person claiming something but he can't provide anything other than his word
- Second hand accounts of that guy
- The presence of bias (this isn't good but it's not evidence that anyone actually cheated)
- Slow vote counting
- Large batches of votes arriving at the same time
- Things "looking funny" such as people at the counting site wearing backpacks
So - do you have anything that actually seems like anyone took a deep dive and has uncovered cheating? I think no because Trump's lawsuits keep getting tossed due to lack of evidence.
So you're admitting that their might be some fraud but not enough to make a difference. That's a good start for you! I know nothing about anything Trump Jr posted. I have seen that you can take many of the 14K dead people from here:
and find that they've voted here:
(Much more than just a few people by the way)
Now can you answer what qualifies as evidence for you? I'm not going to waste my time posting things that don't meet your invisible standard.
Maybe show us district of 500,000 registered voters that produced 600,000 votes.
Or show us evidence of all the dead people that cast ballots.
In that case, you’re saying people likely have dead relatives that they know are still on the register rolls and they will commit identity fraud just to cast that extra vote.
Show us
Then show us how that could lead to tens of thousands of fraudulent votes.
I’m not saying there was voter fraud, but I would definitely not say I am sure there WASN’T fraud either.
Do we think that a party who allows poor performing male high school athletes to “switch” to female and compete and win amongst them would be the type of party to cheat? Or no?
Star wrote:
Maybe show us district of 500,000 registered voters that produced 600,000 votes.
Or show us evidence of all the dead people that cast ballots.
In that case, you’re saying people likely have dead relatives that they know are still on the register rolls and they will commit identity fraud just to cast that extra vote.
Show us
Then show us how that could lead to tens of thousands of fraudulent votes.
you're doing this wrong.
you're supposed to blindly accept everything that Trump says not question it.