You obviously have no idea how a responsible gun owner is required to act, so this argument is moot. i will say that a 9mm Sig Sauer is absolutely an assault weapon with extra magazines and a scope. You live by Democrat labels because they want a gun registry and to ban them. I live in the real World. if you don’t think someone can assault people with multiple clips and a scope then you have no reason to be in this conversation.
You are the type who will justify gunning down Ashli Babbit but think this d*ckhead in Minn is some sort of hero. This guy got exactly what he wanted or he would not return to HIS scene loaded for battle. Explain it any other way and you are delirious.
The dead guy was a felon. When you are licensed to carry in this country and you do not tell police when confronted then you have bad intentions and are considered a threat.
Period.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
Responsible gun owners adhere to several principles. You have not listed any of them. The two things you did list (below) are something you made up off the top of your head to fit the situation.
Pretti adhered to every real principle (not your fake ones) of responsible, lawful gun ownership. The gun was in his waistband at the back. Never had his finger on the trigger or aimed the weapon. He never discharged his weapon.
Nothing to do with responsible gun ownership. And the exception you tried to make for NON-carriers is absurd, contradictory, and backwards. Babbit would have had to stop if she had a gun, but because she didn't have a gun, she can keep assaulting? Is that really what you are trying to tell everyone? In what universe does that make any sense to you at all? Your brain must do everything completely backwards.
Total fvcking bullsh!t. I thought you were at least legit and informed on the Second Amendment, but you are as confused on that as you are on everything else. An American citizen has no duty, obligation or reason to tell a government agent that approaches them that they are armed. They only reason we don't have government tyranny in America is because the people are armed, and they don't have to cough up their guns when the government comes asking.
Yeah, maybe in Alexandra Ocasio Cortez world, but not under any law I've ever heard of in America. With your fake new law, you actually want to weaponize weapon ownership against weapon owners. Think about it.
Then Pretti would be a pretty sophisticated bomber who had done extensive planning. Ifs buts candy nuts. What does that have to do with the two fake principles of gun ownership that you made up?
You can make damn near anything a detonating device. Your shoes, your hat, your cross, candy, nuts, lip balm, tube socks, fish.
You obviously have no idea how a responsible gun owner is required to act, so this argument is moot.
i will say that a 9mm Sig Sayer is absolutely an assault weapon with extra magazines and a scope. You live by Democrat labels because they want a gun registry and to ban them.
I live in the real Workd. if you do t think someone can assault people with multiple clips and a scope then you have no reason to be in this conversation.
You are the type who will justify hi ni g down Ashli Babbit but think this d*clhead in Minn is some sort of hero.
This guy got exactly what he wanted or he would log return to HIS scene loaded for battle. Exsin of any other way and you are delirious.
Maybe El Runkin needs to make his common sense breakdown into a picture book so this Koopa Troopa has reasonable chance at addressing some of the points made.
You obviously have no idea how a responsible gun owner is required to act, so this argument is moot.
i will say that a 9mm Sig Sayer is absolutely an assault weapon with extra magazines and a scope. You live by Democrat labels because they want a gun registry and to ban them.
I live in the real Workd. if you do t think someone can assault people with multiple clips and a scope then you have no reason to be in this conversation.
You are the type who will justify hi ni g down Ashli Babbit but think this d*clhead in Minn is some sort of hero.
This guy got exactly what he wanted or he would log return to HIS scene loaded for battle. Exsin of any other way and you are delirious.
Maybe El Runkin needs to make his common sense breakdown into a picture book so this Koopa Troopa has reasonable chance at addressing some of the points made.
Hes nuts. obviously tries to impress people with big words and sentences but has zero substance. Has no clue what he is actually talking about. just AI Chat blubber.
i like that black panther guy - not because he brandishes, but because he knows what he is talking about.
the morans love trump for the same reasons, but their brainz r dead. They love pedophiles and summary executions of citizens because it gives them a twinge. Efiin’ losers.
I hear all kinds of noise but not a single rebuttal to my points. I will consider that respect.
Tell me why that guy got his *ss kicked, went back and loaded up with his killing machine, and went back to confront his “bully” if not for bad intentions?
Bad intentions do not, under any circumstance, represent lawful gun owners. If you are considering getting involved in a gun fight them you are not right in the head.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
Trump always wins. No man, no woman, no commie can stump him.
its looking like the local & state administrators might have folded and will let ice continue to operate in minneapolis WITH local law enforcement protection in exchange for some fake promises that there will be a real investigation into the two murders & a "scaleback" https://t.co/91pBQVX7Au
Her entire interpretation of this situation is just empathy fueled leftist politics that ignores facts. She doesn't care that the father immigrated illegally and abandoned the child to run from the authorities. She sees a sad child and reflexively blames people she doesn't like. https://t.co/iAlh3O0cUi
Responsible gun owners adhere to several principles. You have not listed any of them. The two things you did list (below) are something you made up off the top of your head to fit the situation.
Pretti adhered to every real principle (not your fake ones) of responsible, lawful gun ownership. The gun was in his waistband at the back. Never had his finger on the trigger or aimed the weapon. He never discharged his weapon.
Nothing to do with responsible gun ownership. And the exception you tried to make for NON-carriers is absurd, contradictory, and backwards. Babbit would have had to stop if she had a gun, but because she didn't have a gun, she can keep assaulting? Is that really what you are trying to tell everyone? In what universe does that make any sense to you at all? Your brain must do everything completely backwards.
Total fvcking bullsh!t. I thought you were at least legit and informed on the Second Amendment, but you are as confused on that as you are on everything else. An American citizen has no duty, obligation or reason to tell a government agent that approaches them that they are armed. They only reason we don't have government tyranny in America is because the people are armed, and they don't have to cough up their guns when the government comes asking.
Yeah, maybe in Alexandra Ocasio Cortez world, but not under any law I've ever heard of in America. With your fake new law, you actually want to weaponize weapon ownership against weapon owners. Think about it.
Then Pretti would be a pretty sophisticated bomber who had done extensive planning. Ifs buts candy nuts. What does that have to do with the two fake principles of gun ownership that you made up?
You can make damn near anything a detonating device. Your shoes, your hat, your cross, candy, nuts, lip balm, tube socks, fish.
You obviously have no idea how a responsible gun owner is required to act, so this argument is moot.
I am well aware of the rules of responsible gun ownership. You are not, or you would not have made two fake rules up and called them "2 principles every lawful gun owner lives by." Total fabrication.
i will say that a 9mm Sig Sayer is absolutely an assault weapon with extra magazines and a scope.
Call it whatever you want, Alexandra. A 9mm Sig Sauer is not an assault weapon.
You live by Democrat labels because they want a gun registry and to ban them.
Irony. Confusion. Sesame Street.
A 9mm Sig Sauer is not an assault weapon.
I live in the real Workd. if you do t think someone can assault people with multiple clips and a scope then you have no reason to be in this conversation.
You can assault someone with a BB gun. It does not make it an assault weapon. The ability to assault is not the defining characteristic of an assault weapon. In the Real World that you referenced, words can have different meanings in different contexts.
You are the type who will justify hi ni g down Ashli Babbit but think this d*clhead in Minn is some sort of hero.
I don't know what it means to hi ni g down someone, but it sounds bad so I doubt I would justify it. I never said Pretti was some sort of hero.
You are the type who makes up things other people say. It's called strawman.
This guy got exactly what he wanted or he would log return to HIS scene loaded for battle. Exsin of any other way and you are delirious.
Carrying a registered 9mm Sig Sauer in your neighborhood is not "loaded for battle." I don't know what "Exsin" means. It looks like a delirious utterance.
We all think you have significant impairments so we believe it is unfair to engage.
Does your care-taker know what you do? Do you think they would be happy with this?
Great response. you have nothing to say because my pints are accurate and you cannot handle it. if you think that loser represents lawful conceal carry users then you’re just out of touch and probably have never shot a gun, let alone carried one.
By the way there is another beautiful armada floating beautifully towards Iran right now. So we will see. I hope they make a deal. I hope they make a deal.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.