You forgot to change names, racist moron. Rottenhouse brought an assault weapon to a protest and had his finger on the trigger. Q: In which state? The guy ICE murdered had a hand gun holstered. Which gun was used to shoot people? Who was murdered, and who became your martyr?
You're acting really stupid. And changing the topic. And engaging in false equivalence. And being autistical. And asking nonsensical rhetorical questions at the end there.
The bottom line is Rittenhaus was acquitted of all charges because the jury believed he acted in self-defense. And it's really easy to see why they believed he acted in self-defense. There is at least one videos showing Rittenhaus on the ground while some jagoff is beating him over the head with a skateboard and another jagoff pulls a gun on him.
You forgot to change names, racist moron. Rottenhouse brought an assault weapon to a protest and had his finger on the trigger. Q: In which state? The guy ICE murdered had a hand gun holstered. Which gun was used to shoot people? Who was murdered, and who became your martyr?
The people Rittenhouse shot or killed were all criminals who were attacking him. In fact, one of them - Joseph Rosenbaum - died as he lived, trying to touch an unwilling minor.
To support Kyle and his fight for justice, text "KYLE" to 36413Visit Our Website: https://fightback.law/ Paypal Donation Page: https://www.paypal.com/donate/...
Can we talk about how insane it is that Trump’s pick to “fight corruption” in Minnesota is a guy who took a $50,000 bribe in a Cava bag — and still won’t say whether he’s even returned it?
Rottenhouse brought a visible weapon to a protest. He did not have a permit. He crossed statelines. He was underage. He threatened people and murdered them when tried to defend themselves.
ICE is in every state & removing illegal aliens in hundreds of cities nationwide without incident.
But the very woketard Minneapolis for some reason is the only city that's going batsh!t crazy.
Tampon Tim and Jacob Frey want chaos, so you do not "lear" about their fraud.
This is the last legal off-ramp for a lot of high ranking Republicans before they’re undoubtedly complicit in crimes against humanity and illegal acts. Many have already dug their grave, and they’ll stay; out of necessity. But the moves today are showing that many who believe they haven’t yet dug their legal grave are not letting this off-ramp pass them by.
Can we talk about how insane it is that Trump’s pick to “fight corruption” in Minnesota is a guy who took a $50,000 bribe in a Cava bag — and still won’t say whether he’s even returned it?
That bribe is less than Noem, her BF Cory, and Grand Wizard Bovino have skimmed. He is the least worst choice to "fix" things.
That other guy does that. Vandalizes other people's posts. The guy who pretends he's white. Is that you? Same modus operandi. "MO" they call it. The theory on MO is that you can link separate acts to one bozo.
Personally speaking, I think vandalizing posts is low-grade tactic. Ineffective. Unsportsmanlike. Geeky. So very, very geeky and lame.
Rottenhouse brought a visible weapon to a protest. He did not have a permit. He crossed statelines. He was underage. He threatened people and murdered them when tried to defend themselves.
He didn't cross state lines with the gun, moran. He lived only a tiny bit away from Kenosha anyway - in Illinois.
Low IQ leftist cow picks up flash bang to throw at law enforcement and instantly finds out. Minnesota will be looked at 100 years from now as a case study for stupid people clearing themselves out of the gene pool. pic.twitter.com/HcetxAMRSv
Rottenhouse brought a visible weapon to a protest. He did not have a permit. He crossed statelines. He was underage. He threatened people and murdered them when tried to defend themselves.
Addressed in relative order.
Rottenhoos did bring a weapon to a BLM riot/lootfest. It was a visible weapon in that one could see it with the naked eyeball.
I believe he did have a gun permit (often called a license).
"Crossing statelines" allegations/elements are problematic, and largely ridiculous in this day and age. The federal government had to use "crossing statelines" laws to prosecute crimes that they believed the states weren't adequately prosecuting. But the feds usually used it unfairly (see, e.g., Chuck Berry) and still do. You should read about it. It's a whole thing. "Crossing statelines" may sound all sinister and devious, but it's really frivolous if you think about it.
A defendant being "underage" is usually a defense or a mitigating factor.
I'm not sure he threatened anyone. I had not heard that before. I doubt you had either. I think you made it up.
The people he shot were certainly not defending themselves. As I pointed out to you, one guy was hitting Rittenhaugen over the head with a skateboard while Rittenhaugen was on the ground, and the other guy had pulled a gun (unregistered and illegally possessed) and pointed it right at Rittenschlausen from a few feet away. That is a pretty slam dunk self-defense case, and a jury of 12 Americans saw it that way. Pretty hard to say they were wrong given the evidence they saw. Videos and all. Plus the guy who aimed a gun at Rittenshaus perjured himself on the stand multiple times about key evidence.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.