OFFICIAL LRC President Donald Trump SECOND TERM Thread

Sally Vix, the dumbest poster on this forum. Constantly making strawman arguments because he thinks it's clever, just idiotic.

In about a half hour he'll use another handle to post that Trump "was graduate" at the top of his class at Wharton.

Then he'll switch back to Sally Vix and claim this and his various other handles aren't him.

He's one pitiful SOB, wasting away in his patio home in the Houston suburbs, pestering people, because his life sucks.

Everyone, please ignore this idiot. He doesn't ever offer a substantive take.

Oh I forgot, he'll respond to this with some kind of victim statement.

I've got your number. The truth stings a little.

I'm not Sally.

Sally you're the dumbest person to post here. You don't even understand what due process is.

You rely in nonsensical strawman arguments because you are stupid. I can't have a discussion with you. You're too dumb.

Stick to looking for typos.

ding, ding, ding.

Get a new act. This one is stale.

I live in Orange County, CA.

Never been to Texas.

Best long jump was almost 9' shorter than 24'.

Pyongyang pay me won which I turn into yuan to fill rice bowl on China-North Korean border.

Trump graduated at the top of his class at Wharton.

Why don't you get a new act?

I say I am not Sally because I am not.

If a pedophile graduates at the top of their class at Wharton are they no longer a pedophile?

I am not Sally.

I don't have an act dipsht. That's you.

You've become beyond boring and predictable.

Sure you do. Your boring and predictable act is falsely labeling one poster as another.

Why do you think I do the China-North Korea thing?

One day I picked a name that happened to be similar to a city on that border.

Some brilliant lefty decided this was proof that I am a Chinese troll, so I decided to humor him.

Do you get a dime for every response? You should be nicer. I just helped you make a buck.

But will the reaction last?

The Draft-Dodger-in-Chief said nasty things about veterans before.
He thinks only dumb people serve in the military. (Presumably "smart" people have rich daddies to buy them deferments, like the Draft-Dodger-in-Chief).
He has been a nasty little insecure coward for years and years, and keeps getting away with it.

Will this be any different? With time, will they forget about this nasty little throw-away remark that he will forget shortly anyway?

Yes, yes. Moscow pay me ruble to troll LRC. I use to buy vodka here on China-North Korea border with rice bowl!

Your translator has trouble with contractions.

A lot of people aren't Sally. But you're the only one who has made an act of not being Sally. It's your schtick. It's like that other guy who pretends he's white. A lot of people aren't white. But he's made it his act to pretend he is white.

Here’s a **side-by-side look at how Sally Vix posts on LetsRun.com compared with what we already saw of tony montana — based on publicly viewable posts (all usernames cited are from LetsRun.com threads)
🆔 Sally Vix — Posting Style
🧠 Topics & Focus
Tends to stay on sport and discussion topics — running, track names, NFL or weather threads — rather than launching into divisive political commentary.
Plays along with the running and athletic context of threads even when it’s tangential (e.g., sprint brothers, 8-lane lists).
🗣️ Tone
Generally informative, conversational, and light-hearted.
Often contributes facts, clarifications, or personal insights rather than confrontational opinions. For example:
Mentions Mennea’s 200 m record history.
Provides QB stats in an NFL discussion.
Comments on weather & prison AC humor.
📣 Interaction Style
Most replies are polite, explanatory, or engaged in the topic.
Doesn’t appear to use provocative or incendiary language in these samples.
Sometimes humorous or playful (like joking about positions in sports).
📍 Examples of Sally Vix Posts
Here are paraphrased representative lines:
Gave insight on sprinting topics and engaged with other posters.
Discussed NFL player stats and questioned rankings.
Talked about weather/humor in thread tangents.
🆔 tony montana — Posting Style (Based on Earlier Summary)
From earlier examples tony montana was described as:
Politically charged or provocative, often jumping off topic.
Using blunt and confrontational language.
Sometimes defensive when challenged about identity.
Rarely focused on track/running issues themselves.
(Note: I don’t have exact tony montana examples from LetsRun in this session, but this characterization came from your earlier conversation summaries.)

🧠 Key Differences Between the Two
Sally Vix:

Typical topic - sports, running, general forum threads

Tone - conversational, topic relevant

Engagement style - polite to humorous

Focus - generally on forum subject matter

Language choice - neutral and straightforward

tony montana:

Typical topic - poitical/culture commentary

Tone - blunt, provocative

Engagement Style - defensive/Aggressive

Focus - often off-topic political remarks

Language Choice - strong, emphatic, sometimes inflammatory

🔍 Can Posting Style Alone Prove They’re the Same Person?
No — even with differences or similarities in writing, style alone isn’t reliable proof of shared identity. Writing can vary for many reasons (mood, topic, audience, intent). Without clear disclosure from the user or forum moderation verification, you can’t conclusively link two usernames based on writing style alone.