Why are you here, Mike Rossi. woman beater?
Don't you have a wife beating to emcee?
Why are you here, Mike Rossi. woman beater?
Don't you have a wife beating to emcee?
Hope Cindy enjoys some big legal bills. Coming your way soon!
Enjoy!
More basic wrote:
Hey Loser trolls. Stop wetting yourselves. All three of you are working yourselves into a frenzy.
Mike and his people know the truth.
BQ baby. He never was disqualified by VIA or Boston.
That is about the only true statement on here.
Mike offered to show photos. Any time. But you losers were too afraid of the truth.
Now Mike is semi retired because he made so much cash DJing. Hahaha. The trolls can't handle that.
Go $&@! yourselves and quit harassing Mike.
Don't you mean got money through ill-gotten gains, as in stolen. Who is repping your marital dissolution?
How's the employment situation, loser.
Oh yeah, NO ONE WANTS A WIFE BEATER TO DJ THEIR WEDDING.
Maybe you can feed the pigeons in the park, old man.
Run Free Little Bob wrote:
How's the employment situation, loser.
Oh yeah, NO ONE WANTS A WIFE BEATER TO DJ THEIR WEDDING.
Maybe you can feed the pigeons in the park, old man.
or feed them on the bunny trail...you certainly aren't running on it...slowest spastic out there.....there are old ladies walking faster with better form...SNOWFLAKE....don't melt
rydalresident wrote:
Run Free Little Bob wrote:How's the employment situation, loser.
Oh yeah, NO ONE WANTS A WIFE BEATER TO DJ THEIR WEDDING.
Maybe you can feed the pigeons in the park, old man.
or feed them on the bunny trail...you certainly aren't running on it...slowest spastic out there.....there are old ladies walking faster with better form...SNOWFLAKE....don't melt
It is so funny to watch him 'run' by and the looks people give each other. OMG.
Everyone knows all about him, but there he goes. An embarrassment to his gender. Oh wait......
For your LOL pleasure...warning...could induce vomiting or extreme LOLing
rydalresident wrote:
For your LOL pleasure...warning...could induce vomiting or extreme LOLing
http://imgur.com/a/nlp4C
Look at the guy's face cropped out to the right. "Really dude? "
rydalresident wrote:
For your LOL pleasure...warning...could induce vomiting or extreme LOLing
http://imgur.com/a/nlp4C
He loves that medal more than his fam!
Kiss it, Mikey!
Loving all the golden oldie stuff, hope Mikey is too.
One of my favs, click on it to get the full flavorsome narrative from Mikey:
Hey neighbor.
Remember when Ken wasn't dead? Good times.
Hope you don't suffer an "aneurysm" too!
DJ Justice wrote:
https://memegenerator.net/instance/80279423/arresting-mike-rossi-punched-my-ticket-dancin-on-air
First there were "Rossi mats." Now we have "Rossi" pads, a sanitary napkin for real pu$$!&s.
Pardon my vulgarity, but Mike deserves it.
Wrong!!!! wrote:
No actually I was just playing devil's advocate to demonstrate how a non-runner looking at that picture,
No one on here cares about non-runners
Ssjdhfjd wrote:
No one on here cares about non-runners
Sorta, we care about Mike.
Wrong!!!! wrote:
No actually I was just playing devil's advocate to demonstrate how a non-runner looking at that picture, wouldn't fully understand what we are talking about thats all.
A non-runner (like Rossi for example) won't get the issue but frankly who cares?
Joanna W wrote:
Hey neighbor.
Remember when Ken wasn't dead? Good times.
Hope you don't suffer an "aneurysm" too!
What's wrong, Mike, you mad bro? Why are perpetuating what you claimed in you disingenuous FB apology that you were shocked by? Your own words and actions.
Rojo Nailed It wrote:
From our esteemed leader Rojo:
Let's review. A guy who has a 5k pb of 21:52, a half-marathon pb of 1:40:44 supposedly ran a 3:11 marathon.
You may not be a running aficianoado so it's going to be hard to put this in perspective for you.
His half marathon time averages out to 7:41 per mile. His marathon time - twice the distance comes out to be 7:18.8 per mile. Thus hes' 22.2 seconds per mile too slow for just the half. So if he was running it on a track, he'd be more than 5 seconds per lap to slow. And you think he can improve that much and double the distance? Not possible.
The men's world record for the half marathon in 58;13. That's 4:27 per mile. If the half marathon WR holder ran a marathon 22.2 second per mile faster than his half pace, the men's marathon WR would be 1:47.03.
Or let's take his 5k time. That comes out to 7:02.3 per mile. People can't run more than 8 times as far just slowing down 16.5 seconds per mile. The world record for the 5k is 12:37.35. That comes out to 4:03.8 per mil
If the world record holder for the 5k could run a marathon slowing down only 16.5 seconds per mile, the world record would roughly be 1:53.45/.
The world record for the marathon is 2:02:57. That comes out to 4:41.36 per mile. So a pro slows down almost 40 seconds per mile when you look at their 5k to marathon differential.
So 1) We've established his other running results AREN'T EVEN IN THE RIGHT BALL PARK . But you want people to believe he had the most amazing day in the history of running, yet
2) His results came in a race which conveniently doesn't have intermediate chip timing. Most big marathons nowadays have it. This race did not. How convenient. So cutting the course is very doable.
3) Instead of chips, one would normally rely on race photographs to prove he was out on the course. There are ZERO race photographs of him on the course except at the finish. The 50 finishers before him and after him were all photographed at least 3 times on the course (two other times not counting the finish). He is nowhere to be seen.
4) The guy loves to brag about his times/performances - yet he was very quite about bragging about his supposed qualifier and didn't upload his GPS.
5) He ran over 3:40 and 4:00 in two recent marathons. THe 3:43 came just two months after his supposed 3:11. In two months, he lost more than a minute per mile yet was happy with the performance post-race?
So there is almsot ZERO reason for me to believe he ran the time he claims to run.
If people can't grasp these facts I don't know what else.
Facts hurt wrote:
Rojo Nailed It wrote:From our esteemed leader Rojo:
Let's review. A guy who has a 5k pb of 21:52, a half-marathon pb of 1:40:44 supposedly ran a 3:11 marathon.
You may not be a running aficianoado so it's going to be hard to put this in perspective for you.
His half marathon time averages out to 7:41 per mile. His marathon time - twice the distance comes out to be 7:18.8 per mile. Thus hes' 22.2 seconds per mile too slow for just the half. So if he was running it on a track, he'd be more than 5 seconds per lap to slow. And you think he can improve that much and double the distance? Not possible.
The men's world record for the half marathon in 58;13. That's 4:27 per mile. If the half marathon WR holder ran a marathon 22.2 second per mile faster than his half pace, the men's marathon WR would be 1:47.03.
Or let's take his 5k time. That comes out to 7:02.3 per mile. People can't run more than 8 times as far just slowing down 16.5 seconds per mile. The world record for the 5k is 12:37.35. That comes out to 4:03.8 per mil
If the world record holder for the 5k could run a marathon slowing down only 16.5 seconds per mile, the world record would roughly be 1:53.45/.
The world record for the marathon is 2:02:57. That comes out to 4:41.36 per mile. So a pro slows down almost 40 seconds per mile when you look at their 5k to marathon differential.
So 1) We've established his other running results AREN'T EVEN IN THE RIGHT BALL PARK . But you want people to believe he had the most amazing day in the history of running, yet
2) His results came in a race which conveniently doesn't have intermediate chip timing. Most big marathons nowadays have it. This race did not. How convenient. So cutting the course is very doable.
3) Instead of chips, one would normally rely on race photographs to prove he was out on the course. There are ZERO race photographs of him on the course except at the finish. The 50 finishers before him and after him were all photographed at least 3 times on the course (two other times not counting the finish). He is nowhere to be seen.
4) The guy loves to brag about his times/performances - yet he was very quite about bragging about his supposed qualifier and didn't upload his GPS.
5) He ran over 3:40 and 4:00 in two recent marathons. THe 3:43 came just two months after his supposed 3:11. In two months, he lost more than a minute per mile yet was happy with the performance post-race?
So there is almsot ZERO reason for me to believe he ran the time he claims to run.
If people can't grasp these facts I don't know what else.
Sadly some do not, although most everyone does. With the exception of Mike Rossi, Barb McKeever and Bart Yasso.
One additional fact of equal performance. If someone in the face of the above facts claims that they have evidence that proves or can substantiate that they ran the race in the time claimed and can counter those facts as presented, and chooses not to show that supposed evidence, the only reasonable conclusion is that the alleged evidence does not and never did, exist. Because if such evidence did exist, anyone in their right mind would show it and prove that they did in fact run the race in the time that was alleged.
Inconvenient Truth wrote:
Facts hurt wrote:If people can't grasp these facts I don't know what else.
Sadly some do not, although most everyone does. With the exception of Mike Rossi, Barb McKeever and Bart Yasso.
One additional fact of equal performance. If someone in the face of the above facts claims that they have evidence that proves or can substantiate that they ran the race in the time claimed and can counter those facts as presented, and chooses not to show that supposed evidence, the only reasonable conclusion is that the alleged evidence does not and never did, exist. Because if such evidence did exist, anyone in their right mind would show it and prove that they did in fact run the race in the time that was alleged.
Also worth either a read for newbies or another read for those who have been here since this story broke, because it really lays out evidence and walks the reader through why not didn't Rossi run 26.2 miles at VIa but the Via RD and Committee essentially said we don't care about the integrity of running and sportsmanship. Just show us the money.
http://www.letsrun.com/news/2015/05/the-evidence-is-overwhelming-mike-rossi-the-viral-marathon-dad-is-a-marathon-cheat-and-should-never-have-been-on-the-starting-line-in-boston/