Naomi Wolf and Peter McCullough: "How Will COVID-19 Vaccines Be Taken Off the Market ?"
McCullough explains that millions are in a state of delusion about Covid vaccine dangers. He compares the situation to smokers in the 1940s & 50s, the period leading up to the 1964 Surgeon General's warning.
Naomi Wolf and Peter McCullough: "How Will COVID-19 Vaccines Be Taken Off the Market ?"
McCullough explains that millions are in a state of delusion about Covid vaccine dangers. He compares the situation to smokers in the 1940s & 50s, the period leading up to the 1964 Surgeon General's warning.
Naomi Wolf and Peter McCullough: "How Will COVID-19 Vaccines Be Taken Off the Market ?"
McCullough explains that millions are in a state of delusion about Covid vaccine dangers. He compares the situation to smokers in the 1940s & 50s, the period leading up to the 1964 Surgeon General's warning.
Naomi Wolf is an America Superstar. You know something Scammer Harambe?
In a conflict between 2 arguments, one that says no harmful effects and the other that says much 1500 harmful effects including death guess which one Aristotle or Plato the logic philosopher would want you to err on?
you guessed it right, they both would ask you to err on the side of harmful effects and death even if only 1 because the theorem of scientific falsifiability states that the truth is only as strong as 1 weak link or harmful effect. That means it is enough for the truth to be dismantled due to 1 contrary finding. The stakes are very high in real science.
thus it is very obvious to the initiated on this thread looking at Dans and Fiskys arguments and yours that the truth about the vaccines being safe has been falsified with so much room to spare. There is not only 1 contrary finding about the vaccine but an infinite amount.
Harambe you are just wasting your time here. You can bring me a hundred peer reviewed science articles that say the vaccines are great but I only need to hit you with 1 peer reviewed article that says otherwise.
I win you lose. There is a Clear winner and a Clear loser in all these. I’m the winner and sorry for you!
At the state level, when RFKs are appointed into positions and try to act on their whims, we, in public health, unite and say "No, he's wrong" and either work with the person to educate them and bring them up to speed, or keep making it clear that they aren't scientifically backed and they get chased out of their position.
10.0.0.0.1 - 10.0.0.1 is the default IP address to login admin panel of a router. It is often mistyped as 10.0.0.0.1 which will return an invalid webpage.
For decades, pharmaceutical companies have shelled out big bucks to broadcasters to place ads between TV segments. But a pair of policies being considered by US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could change that and leave broadcasters in financial straits.
While not an outright ban, the two policies would make it significantly more difficult and expensive for drug companies to push their products across broadcasters’ airwaves, according to a Bloomberg report on Tuesday. The policies look to either mandate that advertisers elaborate on the risks posed by their drugs — forcing ads to be longer and, therefore, more expensive — or bar drugmakers from writing off direct-to-consumer ads as business expenses on their taxes, also padding the bill, Bloomberg reported.
Drug ads, which are illegal in most countries, have been a hallmark of US television since the 1980s. By raising the bar on pharmaceutical ads, the Trump administration threatens a crucial revenue source for broadcasters.
For decades, pharmaceutical companies have shelled out big bucks to broadcasters to place ads between segments. But a pair of policies being considered by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could change...
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
