There is no desire to ‘argue’ with you. I suggest you wake up and see you are over the edge with cyber-bullying this specific athlete, repeatedly on this forum.
There is no desire to ‘argue’ with you. I suggest you wake up and see you are over the edge with cyber-bullying this specific athlete, repeatedly on this forum.
I don't cyberbully any runner. She wouldn't know who I was or that I even exist. The only disputes I become engaged in are with psychotic online fans.
The mods' bias is appallingly obvious here. The likes of you can throw around your personal insults and they have no problem with that, despite there being a rule against "personal attacks", but they delete any response.
But in the end the attacks show only that you are all bereft of substantive argument.
There is no desire to ‘argue’ with you. I suggest you wake up and see you are over the edge with cyber-bullying this specific athlete, repeatedly on this forum.
But you not only cyber-bully this athlete, you also go after fans of the athlete simply because they are fans, and understandably do not appreciate your brutish behavior.
You attack Parker Valby. Why do you mind if others "attack" you? You are a disgusting creep. Leave her alone.
I don't mind if others attack me. What I regard as risible is the pretence by the mods of an impartial enforcement of the rules against personal attacks when they are left here while my responses are deleted. They obviously feel you are at the losing end and they need to protect you.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
There is no desire to ‘argue’ with you. I suggest you wake up and see you are over the edge with cyber-bullying this specific athlete, repeatedly on this forum.
I don't cyberbully any runner. She wouldn't know who I was or that I even exist. The only disputes I become engaged in are with psychotic online fans.
You think people enjoying a respite from their lives to cheer on a hardworking athlete, i.e., being ‘fans’ (derived from the word ‘fanatic’), is “psychotic”. Why the mods have not already banned you on this supposed “fan” site is very telling on what this site actually represents.
If I were Parker, or one of her parents, I would come (legally) after you. I would sue your for defamation. You tried to become a lawyer (and failed), didn't you? You are just a weak coward.
If I were Parker, or one of her parents, I would come (legally) after you. I would sue your for defamation. You tried to become a lawyer (and failed), didn't you? You are just a weak coward.
Still wrong. I qualified in law but worked in journalism. It enables me to know that nothing I have said here is legally actionable. Also, no doping allegations on these boards have resulted in anyone being sued. The site's owners would be the first if that were so, for publishing these allegations. But they are protected by law. Your whining simply shows you can't cope with debate in a public forum.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
If I were Parker, or one of her parents, I would come (legally) after you. I would sue your for defamation. You tried to become a lawyer (and failed), didn't you? You are just a weak coward.
Still wrong. I qualified in law but worked in journalism. It enables me to know that nothing I have said here is legally actionable. Also, no doping allegations on these boards have resulted in any one being sued. The site's owners would be the first if that were so, for publishing these allegations. But they are protected by law. Your whining simply shows you can't cope with debate in a public forum.
You should know that cyberbullying is a crime, then, even if "cyberbullying" was a term that didn't exist when you "qualified". Many things you said here are legally actionable. And you are cyberbullying Parker Valby. You are just lucky I am not her family member. You would be shytting yourself if I were, coward.
Still wrong. I qualified in law but worked in journalism. It enables me to know that nothing I have said here is legally actionable. Also, no doping allegations on these boards have resulted in any one being sued. The site's owners would be the first if that were so, for publishing these allegations. But they are protected by law. Your whining simply shows you can't cope with debate in a public forum.
You should know that cyberbullying is a crime, then, even if "cyberbullying" was a term that didn't exist when you "qualified". Many things you said here are legally actionable. And you are cyberbullying Parker Valby. You are just lucky I am not her family member. You would be shytting yourself if I were, coward.
I think you are just cyberbullying me, by your own definition.
But being sceptical of an athlete's training doesn't fit the definition.
You should know that cyberbullying is a crime, then, even if "cyberbullying" was a term that didn't exist when you "qualified". Many things you said here are legally actionable. And you are cyberbullying Parker Valby. You are just lucky I am not her family member. You would be shytting yourself if I were, coward.
I think you are just cyberbullying me, by your own definition.
But being sceptical of an athlete's training doesn't fit the definition.
Defending someone from an attack is not an attack. You really are a faux-lawyer. You are a faux-human.
I'm locking this thread to new posts. It's driving me nuts. THe same person is reporting posts over and over. FYI, when I see the same person reporting posts over and over, my thought process is to hit "do not delete". But this thread is no longer topical and has been closed to new posts.