Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

880 gal wrote:

Question: Is it a crime to ATTEMPT to obstruct justice or do you have to succeeed at it?

I believe I heard on the tube last night that just the attempt to obstruct justice is a crime.

Yeah, the precedent is Nixon & they’re not going to vote for a Nixon.

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Mueller and his crackpot team of the most seasoned investigators spent 2-plus years investigating EVERYTHING Trump. Everything. Don't buy into the current narrative that the investigation was very narrow. Rosenstein gave Mueller great latitude. And what is the outcome? Mueller and team found no collusion/conspiracy and no obstruction. Wrap it up and put a bow on it. It is done! Trump and company was cleared of any malfeasance. Time to get you panties out of a bunch.

Not only am I not going to race you...

LOOK CHICKEN!!!!!!!

Sally Vix wrote:

Obstruction wrote:

̛I am far more knowledgeable of the law than you are. Attorneys pay me as an expert witness.

Ignorance of the law is the rationale Barr gave to Mueller for not indicting the children of the Trump (daily Don Jr) and Trump himself. So, Barr os obviously not a qualified attorney in your opinion.

I hope attorneys don't pay you too much for your "expert" services. Mueller was never going to indict Trump. Mueller was serving at the behest of the Department of the Justice and it has a long-stranding practice/principle of not indicting sitting presidents.

$250 per hour.

I realize you are whining about spelling—something I could less about on an internet forum. Proper spelling in a draft document will not earn you the pay I make. What does earn me the pay is my ability to limit the amount of money an attorney suing someone can make on a claim. Attorney hire experts to shut down parts of a case. That is what I do.

You on the other hand, with your good, but worthless, internet spelling seem to be unemployed.

The bottom line, after all the smoke and mirrors, is that the Justice Department's official LEGAL position is No Collusion & No Obstruction.

Game over, libs.

Thanks for playing

Barr conquered

Mueller never

http://www.graphic-buffet.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Character_Clown-example.jpg

-pole forever

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The bottom line, after all the smoke and mirrors, is that the Justice Department's official LEGAL position is No Collusion & No Obstruction.

It is NOT the job of the Justice Department to establish official legal position on obstruction and conspiracy. That responsibility belongs to CONGRESS.

Sally Vix wrote:

880 gal wrote:

Question: Is it a crime to ATTEMPT to obstruct justice or do you have to succeeed at it?

I believe I heard on the tube last night that just the attempt to obstruct justice is a crime.

If that is true then why is Trump not guilty of attempted obstruction of justice. The report clearly says he tried to do illegal things but his staff either ignored him or refused to do it.

real take wrote:

first take wrote:

From a first day's exposure to the parts of the report that have risen to the surface, it seems that the most politically embarrassing thing for Trump is that on multiple occasions he did pressure his people to obstruct the investigation in some way. This is what the anti-Trump media will fixate on. They will paint Trump as impulsive and stupid and thinking he is above the law.

What will be ignored is that Trump's people pushed back on him and said "no" AND YET TRUMP TOOK THEIR ADVISE.

You are wrong.

Trump forced many of the people who defied him into quitting. The list of this forces out is incredibly long..... Jeff Sessions, Comney, Neilson, ....

TRUMP DOES NOT TAKE ANYONE'S ADVICE. HE OPERATES ON HIS GUT FEEL.

So then why didn't he fire Meuller? Why did he let the investigation go to completion? He gave them all the documents the investigation ever requested.

It's over dude, just let it go. You were lied to and you fell for it. It's ok. There are lots of corporate political activist journalist telling you lies. But now is the time to realize you were lied to. It's ok, we'll forgive you.

880 gal wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I believe I heard on the tube last night that just the attempt to obstruct justice is a crime.

If that is true then why is Trump not guilty of attempted obstruction of justice. The report clearly says he tried to do illegal things but his staff either ignored him or refused to do it.

Barr's presser was not a trial decision announcement. Sure, Barr pretended he was the jury. Yes, Barr pretended he was the judge. But Barr is neither of those.

Remember when Omarosa said she had audio of Trump saying "ni**er"?

I remember that. I have the ability to absorb news information and process it's validity for myself. Where's the audio? Until she presents the audio, everything she said is not credible.

As for the quote from Parscale, that applies to the corrupt investigators and other Democrat actors that started the investigation for political purposes and knew it was not based on solid legal evidence. So of course Trump's justice department should start to investigate how this all got started. To do anything less would be to allow a miscarriage of justice to go unpunished.

But none of what I said will make any sense to you, there's no room in your brain for anything other than the TDS meningitis.

ILL LEGAL wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The bottom line, after all the smoke and mirrors, is that the Justice Department's official LEGAL position is No Collusion & No Obstruction.

It is NOT the job of the Justice Department to establish official legal position on obstruction and conspiracy. That responsibility belongs to CONGRESS.

The Dems in Congress are certifiable:

IQ higher than a chicken wrote:

Remember when Omarosa said she had audio of Trump saying "ni**er"?

I remember that. I have the ability to absorb news information and process it's validity for myself. Where's the audio? Until she presents the audio, everything she said is not credible.

The "you can't prove it because you don't have easily faked video or audio" defense has failed time and time again. Omarosa is FAR, FAR, FAR more credible than Trump.

At this point, can the democratic party and its media be taken seriously anymore? I certainly don't think so.

It didn't really matter what the report showed. Liberals minds were long made up.

chickens dont fly wrote:

IQ higher than a chicken wrote:

Remember when Omarosa said she had audio of Trump saying "ni**er"?

I remember that. I have the ability to absorb news information and process it's validity for myself. Where's the audio? Until she presents the audio, everything she said is not credible.

The "you can't prove it because you don't have easily faked video or audio" defense has failed time and time again. Omarosa is FAR, FAR, FAR more credible than Trump.

Remember Trump's black girlfriend?

At this point, can the republican party and its media be taken seriously anymore? I certainly don't think so.

It didn't really matter what the report showed. Trumper minds were long made up.]

i said trump won't win the nomnation

i said trump won't win the election

i said trump will get indited

i said hillary would win.

i say my track record is perfect.

i say my intregity is perfect.

i continue to predict the future with 100% accuracy.

and everybody else is an idiot.

it'e all about me and my opinion .

and you're an idiot.

real take wrote:

first take wrote:

From a first day's exposure to the parts of the report that have risen to the surface, it seems that the most politically embarrassing thing for Trump is that on multiple occasions he did pressure his people to obstruct the investigation in some way. This is what the anti-Trump media will fixate on. They will paint Trump as impulsive and stupid and thinking he is above the law.

What will be ignored is that Trump's people pushed back on him and said "no" AND YET TRUMP TOOK THEIR ADVISE.

You are wrong.

Trump forced many of the people who defied him into quitting. The list of this forces out is incredibly long..... Jeff Sessions, Comney, Neilson, ....

TRUMP DOES NOT TAKE ANYONE'S ADVICE. HE OPERATES ON HIS GUT FEEL.

Yep. "first take" is wrong. Trump directed these people to Obstruct Justice, and they said no. This doesn't show Trump's ability to hire decent people. It shows that he's a criminal and we got lucky that these people either respected the law or feared the law and did not follow his direction. Are we supposed to just plan on the people around him to keep him from unethical and criminal behavior? Ridiculous.

880 gal wrote:

Question: Is it a crime to ATTEMPT to obstruct justice or do you have to succeeed at it?

It is a crime to attempt to obstruct justice.

It's called "endeavor to obstruct justice." You do not have to be successful.

Barred from society wrote:

At this point, can the democratic party and its media be taken seriously anymore? I certainly don't think so.

It didn't really matter what the report showed. Liberals minds were long made up.

These dem clowns self-defeating delusion never ends. They had so much invested with Mueller and they still refuse to admit defeat.