Biden hasn’t been ahead in a swing state poll in 2024.
do I win something?
@SusquehannaPR Today we released our new Pa poll at @PAPressClub showing Biden leading Pa by 50%-45% margin. Sampling error is +\-4.6%. Sample size is N=450 likely voters. 2:35 PM · Mar 25, 2024 · 13K Views
We’re talking about polls that people have actually heard of:
CNN, along with its polling partner SSRS, surveyed 1,132 registered voters in Pennsylvania to find that the presidential race between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump is not only within the margin of error – it’s even. Each candidate received 46 percent support from the respondents in a survey taken March 13-18.
The numbers shifted a bit with the addition of more candidates, especially Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who garnered 16 percent support, while Trump edged ahead of Biden, 40-38.
Former President Trump topped President Biden by 8 points among Michigan registered voters in a poll of a hypothetical rematch of the 2020 election. The CNN poll released Friday found 50 percent of…
Former President Trump topped President Biden by 8 points among Michigan registered voters in a poll of a hypothetical rematch of the 2020 election.
The CNN poll released Friday found 50 percent of voters say they would support Trump if the presidential election were held today, and 42 percent would support Biden. Five percent say they would support somebody else, and 2 percent say they don’t plan to vote.
Why would Democrats even support Biden? He wasn’t who you wanted. You wanted Bernie. But the DNC decided who you were gonna get.
It’s even worse with the vice president who was thoroughly rejected by the Democrat voters and didn’t even make it to the primaries yet she was installed as the VP.
What a liar! You taught kids in Sunday School while not believing in the Scriptures. You lied not only to the kids but to God himself. Ouch.
Nope! I never lied to them. Not once. A scripture exists, and there is meaning behind it. I can read, even to this day, a piece of scripture and find positive meaning in it. I never once told those kids that Jesus was the son of God or that he walked on water or that Noah's Ark was a TRUE story. I taught them stories in the Bible, and those stories exist, and what I told them about them was true.
Here's also what I didn't teach the kids about what's in the Bible:
2 Kings 2:23-24
"23 From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” 24 He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys."
So, a curse in the name of the Lord resulted in bears coming out of the woods and mauling 42 boys. Nice.
I also didn't emphasize that in the Noah story, God DROWNED everyone on Earth who wasn't on Noah's boat.
I also didn't tell them that Lot's two female children got him drunk and then had sex with him and got pregnant.
You know...LOTS of things in the Bible not to tell a child. I taught them about the Good Samaritan, grace, forgiveness, don't steal...things like that...I kept it all appropriate for children. Even when talking of the birth of Jesus or Easter, I always made sure to say things like, "Today we're going to talk about the story of Easter." I never ever presented those fantastical stories as true...because they aren't.
These were not small, innocent children. They were wicked YOUNG MEN, comparable to a modern street gang. The King James Version has done us a disservice by translated the term as “children.” The Hebrew word can refer to children, but rather more specifically means "young men."
For a Sunday School teacher, you should know this. Take the "L" here.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
I see a bunch of triggered LR libs melting down over the NY appellate court decision. Reducing Trump's fine to appeal and seeing that fat cow Leticia James failing to seize his properties. The NYC court system is full of leftist/ Trump hating judges.
Cope snowflakes. Just wait until the entire case is overturned.
Meh. I'm certainly not melting down. Letitia (that's how you spell it) James is a fat cow, but Trump isn't? (and don't tell me that cows are female either, because there's isn't a man out there more feminine than Donald J. Trump with his makeup and hairspray and no calluses ever on his hands...he's soft and squishy and cow-like...and fat).
You are dreaming if you think the case will be overturned. Wow, I had no idea the delusion was so strong with you. As usual, I give you Trumpers way more leeway than I should. You're all batsh!t crazy, and I should just accept that in all cases and in all your opinions.
Is the court full of leftist/Trump hating judges? Of course...because most of the United States is left, and most of the left hates Trump. He EARNED that hate with his behavior...serial lying, sexual assault that a judge called rape, inviting and inciting a violent mob to try to overturn a fair election, stealing and hiding classified documents from the federal government, cheating in the 2016 election by committing felony campaign law vioilations...you know, little things.
I have no need for Letitia James to seize his properties, but I DO have a need for justice, and if justice means she has to seize his properties, then sobeit. I remain skeptical that what he OWNS on his properties is all that much in total. Michael Cohen says Trump only has a $1 million stake in 40 Wall Street. If that's true, that's INSANE that he owns so little of that building that is one of the gems in his holdings. Trump doesn't own Trump Tower in New York. GMAC Commercial Mortgage owns it. Unclear how much if any of the building Trump actually owns, and that's true of ALL of his properties. He has long bragged to be the "King of debt," so that could very well mean he owns very little of the properties that bear his name. We shall see.
Nope! I never lied to them. Not once. A scripture exists, and there is meaning behind it. I can read, even to this day, a piece of scripture and find positive meaning in it. I never once told those kids that Jesus was the son of God or that he walked on water or that Noah's Ark was a TRUE story. I taught them stories in the Bible, and those stories exist, and what I told them about them was true.
Here's also what I didn't teach the kids about what's in the Bible:
2 Kings 2:23-24
"23 From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” 24 He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys."
So, a curse in the name of the Lord resulted in bears coming out of the woods and mauling 42 boys. Nice.
I also didn't emphasize that in the Noah story, God DROWNED everyone on Earth who wasn't on Noah's boat.
I also didn't tell them that Lot's two female children got him drunk and then had sex with him and got pregnant.
You know...LOTS of things in the Bible not to tell a child. I taught them about the Good Samaritan, grace, forgiveness, don't steal...things like that...I kept it all appropriate for children. Even when talking of the birth of Jesus or Easter, I always made sure to say things like, "Today we're going to talk about the story of Easter." I never ever presented those fantastical stories as true...because they aren't.
These were not small, innocent children. They were wicked YOUNG MEN, comparable to a modern street gang. The King James Version has done us a disservice by translated the term as “children.” The Hebrew word can refer to children, but rather more specifically means "young men."
For a Sunday School teacher, you should know this. Take the "L" here.
Justifying evilness in the Bible I see. I don't really care if they were boys or men or girls or women or whatever. A dude, was ridiculed for being bald, and as a punishment, he cursed them in the name of the LORD and then some bears came out of the woods and mauled 42 of them. Again, Nice.
No comments on the Lot's children story? How about all the other killing of innocent people in the Bible? Innocent children, babies, fetuses no doubt had their lives ended in the Great Flood, eh?
What about stoning to death a person who works on the Sabbath? Is that a good story for children? What about stories of rape and concubines? Are those Bible stories appropriate for children? What about the Bowls of Wrath? What about all the murders in the Bible? My class had 8 and 9 year olds in it. Are those stories ones to bring up with them?
What about details about King Herod? Good for children?
Should I have told them that their adulterous parents can't go to Heaven? How about their Jewish friends from school? Should I have said, "You know, Joel's going to Hell because he's Jewish." Should I have said, "I hope none of you know a hunchback or a Dwarf, because they're going to hell. Better not have a skin rash or itch or you're going to hell. Got something wrong with your eyes? Going to hell!"
I would say that out of all the swing states PA is the closest. I don’t think Trump will need it.
I don't think the state government would let Trump win PA no matter how many votes he was up by at 11pm on election night.
There is such a thing called "margin of cheat." After a certain percentage of votes counted, it will mathematically impossible to overcome a lead. Sleepy Joe may run into this issue late on election night.
As long as there are no ballots for Biden to be magically found under tables in GA at 3:30AM or water pipe bursts or windows being covered up in MI or thousands of dead voters/no signature verification for Biden in AZ, this can be a yuuuge win for ma ga.
Btw, why is the term MA-GA banned????? It's not a curse word nor racial slur. The lib mods need to un-ban it.
Well, we Democrats clearly stole Pennsylvania from Trump last time and you moron Repubicans didn't catch us, so we'll just do it again...amirite?!
You might as well stay home this time. Waste of your time to vote.
And most certainly do not vote by mail. Trump says that is a no no for Republicans. And if you voted for Haley or DeSantis, the stable genius say he doesn’t need your vote.
These were not small, innocent children. They were wicked YOUNG MEN, comparable to a modern street gang. The King James Version has done us a disservice by translated the term as “children.” The Hebrew word can refer to children, but rather more specifically means "young men."
For a Sunday School teacher, you should know this. Take the "L" here.
Justifying evilness in the Bible I see. I don't really care if they were boys or men or girls or women or whatever. A dude, was ridiculed for being bald, and as a punishment, he cursed them in the name of the LORD and then some bears came out of the woods and mauled 42 of them. Again, Nice.
No comments on the Lot's children story? How about all the other killing of innocent people in the Bible? Innocent children, babies, fetuses no doubt had their lives ended in the Great Flood, eh?
What about stoning to death a person who works on the Sabbath? Is that a good story for children? What about stories of rape and concubines? Are those Bible stories appropriate for children? What about the Bowls of Wrath? What about all the murders in the Bible? My class had 8 and 9 year olds in it. Are those stories ones to bring up with them?
What about details about King Herod? Good for children?
Should I have told them that their adulterous parents can't go to Heaven? How about their Jewish friends from school? Should I have said, "You know, Joel's going to Hell because he's Jewish." Should I have said, "I hope none of you know a hunchback or a Dwarf, because they're going to hell. Better not have a skin rash or itch or you're going to hell. Got something wrong with your eyes? Going to hell!"
I don't want to derail this thread with theology but you have an inability to be concise with your responses. Learn how to get to the point without writing a book. Do better.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Why would Democrats even support Biden? He wasn’t who you wanted. You wanted Bernie. But the DNC decided who you were gonna get.
It’s even worse with the vice president who was thoroughly rejected by the Democrat voters and didn’t even make it to the primaries yet she was installed as the VP.
Caucus & primary process are theater. Federal election laws do not apply. A political party may select who they want. A party can have caucus and primary, then go into a smoked-filled room and select someone else. U.S. corporations selected Biden. U.S. corporations told J E Clyburn, Amy Klobuchar and Mayor Pete, Biden is "our guy."
Check Out The Everywhere Project below!https://www.everywhereproject.org/Become a Channel Member to help support the channel! https://www.youtube.com/channel...
hoo boy yeah those fentanyl addicts are serious about their voting! Never miss a chance to pull the lever! Political junkies yes! Definitely Democrats.
