Taking Bets wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
This made me chuckle.
my bet is that flagpole won't do it.
Flagpole - here is the official offer - we do the 5K on July 4. I can pay for your airfare and accomondations. We can offer that the lose makes a significant charity bet but that is not necessary.
Sally Vix wrote:
And allowing religious freedom??? It is the conservatives who want everyone to have the ability to worship whatever deity that person chooses to. That freedom of religion is totally at odds with Islam which wants to kill non-believers. Come on dude.
BS. Trumpers want a Christian nation, one in which we all have to speak English, and they want prayer in schools, and it's not Muslim prayer they want in schools. A ban on Muslims was a rallying cry among the Trumpers. You show your bigotry about Islam. That some radical Muslims want to kill non-believers is NOT indicative of the religion. Anyone practicing their religion is protected by the constitution as long as they follow the laws of the land. Radical Christians have killed many people in the US in the name of religion. Do we need to ban Christianity?
I may have to change my statement that you don't know much. You actually might not know anything.
Sally Vix wrote:
Taking Bets wrote:
my bet is that flagpole won't do it.
Flagpole - here is the official offer - we do the 5K on July 4. I can pay for your airfare and accomondations. We can offer that the lose makes a significant charity bet but that is not necessary.
Frogpole don't do charity.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
And allowing religious freedom??? It is the conservatives who want everyone to have the ability to worship whatever deity that person chooses to. That freedom of religion is totally at odds with Islam which wants to kill non-believers. Come on dude.
BS. Trumpers want a Christian nation, one in which we all have to speak English, and they want prayer in schools, and it's not Muslim prayer they want in schools. A ban on Muslims was a rallying cry among the Trumpers. You show your bigotry about Islam. That some radical Muslims want to kill non-believers is NOT indicative of the religion. Anyone practicing their religion is protected by the constitution as long as they follow the laws of the land. Radical Christians have killed many people in the US in the name of religion. Do we need to ban Christianity?
I may have to change my statement that you don't know much. You actually might not know anything.
She knows that you're scared to race her.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
And allowing religious freedom??? It is the conservatives who want everyone to have the ability to worship whatever deity that person chooses to. That freedom of religion is totally at odds with Islam which wants to kill non-believers. Come on dude.
BS. Trumpers want a Christian nation, one in which we all have to speak English, and they want prayer in schools, and it's not Muslim prayer they want in schools. A ban on Muslims was a rallying cry among the Trumpers. You show your bigotry about Islam. That some radical Muslims want to kill non-believers is NOT indicative of the religion. Anyone practicing their religion is protected by the constitution as long as they follow the laws of the land. Radical Christians have killed many people in the US in the name of religion. Do we need to ban Christianity?
I may have to change my statement that you don't know much. You actually might not know anything.
Do you not understand the Muslims WANT TO BAN OPPOSING RELGIIONS. I am a catholic and I cherish that Muhammad from down the street can worship who he or she loves. Come on Flag! It is Muslims who don't want others to worship.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
And allowing religious freedom??? It is the conservatives who want everyone to have the ability to worship whatever deity that person chooses to. That freedom of religion is totally at odds with Islam which wants to kill non-believers. Come on dude.
BS. Trumpers want a Christian nation, one in which we all have to speak English, and they want prayer in schools, and it's not Muslim prayer they want in schools. A ban on Muslims was a rallying cry among the Trumpers. You show your bigotry about Islam. That some radical Muslims want to kill non-believers is NOT indicative of the religion. Anyone practicing their religion is protected by the constitution as long as they follow the laws of the land. Radical Christians have killed many people in the US in the name of religion. Do we need to ban Christianity?
I may have to change my statement that you don't know much. You actually might not know anything.
Flagpole - are we one for July 4th? I will pay your airfare and hotel. We will go mano a mano. The loser can make hefty donation to charity but you don't have to if you don't want to.
Sally Vix wrote:
Do you not understand the Muslims WANT TO BAN OPPOSING RELGIIONS. I am a catholic and I cherish that Muhammad from down the street can worship who he or she loves. Come on Flag! It is Muslims who don't want others to worship.
Would I be living in freaking Texas if I didn't want to be around Christians?
Flogpole wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
BS. Trumpers want a Christian nation, one in which we all have to speak English, and they want prayer in schools, and it's not Muslim prayer they want in schools. A ban on Muslims was a rallying cry among the Trumpers. You show your bigotry about Islam. That some radical Muslims want to kill non-believers is NOT indicative of the religion. Anyone practicing their religion is protected by the constitution as long as they follow the laws of the land. Radical Christians have killed many people in the US in the name of religion. Do we need to ban Christianity?
I may have to change my statement that you don't know much. You actually might not know anything.
She knows that you're scared to race her.
What a crazy thing you just said. Conservatives want nothing to do with a Christian nation. Your mind is crazy. Conservatives want freedom of religion where anyone can worship whoever they want. Liberals don't want that.
Make America Great Again wrote:
Khashoggi was killed by some rogue members who ran out of control.
Do you defend MSB's direction to kill Khashoggi because Trump defends him?
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
BS. Trumpers want a Christian nation, one in which we all have to speak English, and they want prayer in schools, and it's not Muslim prayer they want in schools. A ban on Muslims was a rallying cry among the Trumpers. You show your bigotry about Islam. That some radical Muslims want to kill non-believers is NOT indicative of the religion. Anyone practicing their religion is protected by the constitution as long as they follow the laws of the land. Radical Christians have killed many people in the US in the name of religion. Do we need to ban Christianity?
I may have to change my statement that you don't know much. You actually might not know anything.
Flagpole - are we one for July 4th? I will pay your airfare and hotel. We will go mano a mano. The loser can make hefty donation to charity but you don't have to if you don't want to.
I think Flagpole is dodging you.
Coward of the County wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole - are we one for July 4th? I will pay your airfare and hotel. We will go mano a mano. The loser can make hefty donation to charity but you don't have to if you don't want to.
I think Flagpole is dodging you.
Give him time. I am not sure how old he is but I don't think it will be close.
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
I hear you on the legal immigration.
On the muslim ban...I think it's pretty clear given his own statement saying he wanted a muslim ban, that he meant it as a muslim ban. Nothing in his actions would lead me to believe he had anything but aggression toward muslims in his heart when he banned them. Nothing he has done or said would counteract his own statemetn that he wanted no muslims entering the country.
As for indonesia, since there are no anti-american indonesian terrorists he didn't ban them.
You don't realize it but you just confirmed that it was not a Muslim ban. It was a ban against terrorist Muslims. Here is what you said ... "As for Indonesia, since there are no anti-american indonesian terrorists, he didn't ban them." Exactly, he only banned those Muslims from Muslim TERRORIST countries.
I have no doubt that trump banned muslims mostly because he wanted to stop terrorism. Ultimately, that's why a few versions later the courts okd his ban. Presidents have leeway when it comes to national security and immigration.
The problem is that of ethnic/religious collective punishment - we don't do that. That is a fundamentally unamerican concept, one we intended to leave behind in Europe. The country was literally founded in part to avoid collective punishment by ethnic or religious group.
To quote a not very wise congress person, just because some people did something, doesn't mean that millions of Muslims should be targeted or banned. Americans arent' supposed to do that. Our creed demands that we don't do things like that.
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
BS. Trumpers want a Christian nation, one in which we all have to speak English, and they want prayer in schools, and it's not Muslim prayer they want in schools. A ban on Muslims was a rallying cry among the Trumpers. You show your bigotry about Islam. That some radical Muslims want to kill non-believers is NOT indicative of the religion. Anyone practicing their religion is protected by the constitution as long as they follow the laws of the land. Radical Christians have killed many people in the US in the name of religion. Do we need to ban Christianity?
I may have to change my statement that you don't know much. You actually might not know anything.
Do you not understand the Muslims WANT TO BAN OPPOSING RELGIIONS. I am a catholic and I cherish that Muhammad from down the street can worship who he or she loves. Come on Flag! It is Muslims who don't want others to worship.
Christians have killed more non-believers than any other religion. Me thinks you need a history lesson. You should look up the crusades.
2 Chronicles 15:12-13 ESV
And they entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and with all their soul, but that whoever would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, should be put to death, whether young or old, man or woman.
That’s pretty clear right?
It’s pretty common in the religions of Abraham (Judaism, Christian, and Islam) to promote the death of non-believers. Modern interpretations of these passages tend to lean towards more of a “spiritual death” or use this more as a metaphor versus actually stoning nonbelievers.
Alan
We are on Flagpole! July 4, Houston. I will pay your airfare and hotel. We will have to decide the award for the winner. I think you are 46 and i am 58 but I don't think it is going to be close. Please confirm.
agip wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You don't realize it but you just confirmed that it was not a Muslim ban. It was a ban against terrorist Muslims. Here is what you said ... "As for Indonesia, since there are no anti-american indonesian terrorists, he didn't ban them." Exactly, he only banned those Muslims from Muslim TERRORIST countries.
I have no doubt that trump banned muslims mostly because he wanted to stop terrorism. Ultimately, that's why a few versions later the courts okd his ban. Presidents have leeway when it comes to national security and immigration.
The problem is that of ethnic/religious collective punishment - we don't do that. That is a fundamentally unamerican concept, one we intended to leave behind in Europe. The country was literally founded in part to avoid collective punishment by ethnic or religious group.
To quote a not very wise congress person, just because some people did something, doesn't mean that millions of Muslims should be targeted or banned. Americans arent' supposed to do that. Our creed demands that we don't do things like that.
According to your own statement, "we" didn't do that.
Sally Vix wrote:
We are on Flagpole! July 4, Houston. I will pay your airfare and hotel. We will have to decide the award for the winner. I think you are 46 and i am 58 but I don't think it is going to be close. Please confirm.
I think flagpole is skeered.
Sally Vix wrote:
We are on Flagpole! July 4, Houston. I will pay your airfare and hotel. We will have to decide the award for the winner. I think you are 46 and i am 58 but I don't think it is going to be close. Please confirm.
As long as there will be a training montage, I am 100% in favor.
agip wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
We are on Flagpole! July 4, Houston. I will pay your airfare and hotel. We will have to decide the award for the winner. I think you are 46 and i am 58 but I don't think it is going to be close. Please confirm.
As long as there will be a training montage, I am 100% in favor.
Yep. Let's do this.
Taking Bets wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
This made me chuckle.
my bet is that flagpole won't do it.
I bet that Flagpole will come up with some lame excuse.
Sally Vix wrote:
We are on Flagpole! July 4, Houston. I will pay your airfare and hotel. We will have to decide the award for the winner. I think you are 46 and i am 58 but I don't think it is going to be close. Please confirm.
Flagpole would wipe the floor with you. You're a big talker. All hat, no cowboy.