Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

Racket wrote:

Wall Street also has Trump winning 2020 with same odds

well predictit has trump winning at just 40%.

not sure what you are looking at.

https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/3698/Who-will-win-the-2020-US-presidential-election

OK I was slightly off, more like 70% of Wall Street people who were polled thinks he'll win. Same thing really

They don’t make any sense, but they’re good for a few laughs.

We have to ask: “Do you kiss your falsely-foreign mother with that mouth?”

dreamers wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

That is all you have? Seriously? I was born in 1960 and my family moved here that same year. So, I have lived in Texas 57.5 years of my 58 years.

So, you are a Dreamer. Trump wants you evicted back where you came from.

Wow . . . so Sally is claiming that she is 100% a member of different state than she was born in because she has lived in a new state for such a long. That means that every immigrant or Dreamer can make the same claim. But she wants to deport them because .... why? Because Trump claims they cannot be Americans .... because of their skin color .... no matter how long they have lived here .... even if they were born in America?

Conclusion: Sally is a hypocrite.

The dem candidates are running for president on higher taxes, open borders, global warming, socialized medicine, free stuff, more regulations- this plays well on PMSNBC and on the Clown News Network.

Meanwhile the Trump economy remains strong, low unemployment, strong stock market, a freeze on interest rate increases, etc.

Trump wins, Trump wins again

M-A-G-A!!!

KAG2020

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The dem candidates are running for president on higher taxes, open borders, global warming, socialized medicine, free stuff, more regulations- this plays well on PMSNBC and on the Clown News Network.

Meanwhile the Trump economy remains strong, low unemployment, strong stock market, a freeze on interest rate increases, etc.

Trump wins, Trump wins again

M-A-G-A!!!

KAG2020

hey do me a favor and link to a leading democrat who campaigns on open borders. Thanks!

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Meanwhile the Trump economy remains strong, low unemployment, strong stock market, a freeze on interest rate increases, etc.

2007 was a year when oil prices soared, home sales plunged and the U.S. dollar took a dive. But it was also a year when the U.S. economy performed well — at least until the last quarter — and the stock markets' major indexes are set to finish the year higher.

2019 to date is looking like 2007.

And then 2008 happened.

So no point in talking about the economy 18 months before the election.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

a freeze on interest rate increases, etc.

a) has (hopefully) nothing to do with Trump.

b) like 75% of the FOMC board (including Willaims, Evans, Clarida, and Brainard) are huge inflation hawks so good luck with that

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

The dem candidates are running for president on higher taxes, open borders, global warming, socialized medicine, free stuff, more regulations- this plays well on PMSNBC and on the Clown News Network.

Meanwhile the Trump economy remains strong, low unemployment, strong stock market, a freeze on interest rate increases, etc.

Trump wins, Trump wins again

M-A-G-A!!!

KAG2020

hey do me a favor and link to a leading democrat who campaigns on open borders. Thanks!

Beta O'Dork

"The rebuke comes after O’Rourke told MSNBC last week that would “absolutely” tear down the border wall in El Paso, Texas, if he gets the chance.

.“Absolutely, I'd take the wall down,” O'Rouke said. “Here's what we know: After the Secure Fence Act, we have built 600 miles of wall and fencing on a 2,000 mile border. What that has done is not in any demonstrable way made us safer.”...

L L wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

Dems may pick up a net +1 but won’t flip. That’s a good thing. Government ruled by one party is never a good thing. There needs to be balance. Not all Dem ideas are good. Not all GOP ideas are bad.

Also Trump has zero chance of winning.

https://morningconsult.com/tracking-trump/

Alan

That's not a good think if the senate is in Republican hands with a Democrat president.

It would mean that they would control who gets confirmed for any Supreme Court nominations or simply block any new Supreme Court vacancies from being filled for four years.

If RBG croaks, we will be down to 8 Justices for the foreseeable future until you have the president and Senate of the same party.

SCOTUS confirmations used to be pretty unanimous, not along party lines. It would be nice if we got back to that. Judges aren’t typically “liberal” or “conservative” and most SCOTUS judges shift ideology over time.

Alan

"At least Beto is honest about his open border policy."

You lose, agip.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

"At least Beto is honest about his open border policy."

You lose, agip.

The open borders are mostly in republican Texas. There is something called the Rio Grande that Texans DO NOT want walled off. That would be give control of the river to Mexico. It would also require running fences across the middle of many homes, in some cases right through a bedroom.

Again, Rigged proves he is an idiot.

Opem Borders wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

"At least Beto is honest about his open border policy."

You lose, agip.

The open borders are mostly in republican Texas. There is something called the Rio Grande that Texans DO NOT want walled off. That would be give control of the river to Mexico. It would also require running fences across the middle of many homes, in some cases right through a bedroom.

Again, Rigged proves he is an idiot.

Again, with a piss poor attempt to spin. Beta wants to tear down an existing border wall. Admit defeat, unregistered lib troll loser.

Trump’s policy is magic, because he can magically make Mexico pay for it, and magically get stupid people to vote for it.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/politics/texas/article/Beto-O-Rourke-calls-for-tearing-down-existing-13619745.php

"At least Beto is honest about his open border policy."

You lose, agip.

That doesn't mean he is for open borders. He still wants borders enforced but he doesn't want fences in places they aren't helping.

agip wins.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

hey do me a favor and link to a leading democrat who campaigns on open borders. Thanks!

Beta O'Dork

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala-harris-says-we-cant-have-open-borders-as-she-swipes-at-beto-orourke-far-left-dems

"The rebuke comes after O’Rourke told MSNBC last week that would “absolutely” tear down the border wall in El Paso, Texas, if he gets the chance.

.“Absolutely, I'd take the wall down,” O'Rouke said. “Here's what we know: After the Secure Fence Act, we have built 600 miles of wall and fencing on a 2,000 mile border. What that has done is not in any demonstrable way made us safer.”...

You do know that open borders is an entirely different concept than no or reduced border walls, right? I mean, you do have sufficient mental capacity to understand the difference between these two concepts, right?

Oh, and you do know that one Dem candidate trying to score points against another is a different concept than "a leading democrat who campaigns on open borders", right? Your IQ is not too low to understand this, right? Right?

What the heck, I'm feeling generous. I'll give you a mulligan on this one. Would you care to try again?

(or reduced

Trump wants open borders with Russia ??, he loves it when they drop by. And he was happy to have those Turkish bodyguards beat up Americans, what a creep.

Opem Borders wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

"At least Beto is honest about his open border policy."

You lose, agip.

The open borders are mostly in republican Texas. There is something called the Rio Grande that Texans DO NOT want walled off. That would be give control of the river to Mexico. It would also require running fences across the middle of many homes, in some cases right through a bedroom.

Again, Rigged proves he is an idiot.

i have never heard of a bigger idiot than this rigged person.

Runningart2004 wrote:

SCOTUS confirmations used to be pretty unanimous, not along party lines. It would be nice if we got back to that. Judges aren’t typically “liberal” or “conservative” and most SCOTUS judges shift ideology over time.

Alan

You think we may get back to a justice like RBG being confirmed 93-3 again?

I seriously think if McConnell stays Senate majority leader he'd block a moderate nomination from a Democrat like Garland for another 4 years.

They have no shame or sense of what's best.