Sally, you shithead wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Name one Democratic presidential candidate who is against infanticide. If he or she is they would never get the nomination.
Who is supporting infanticide? NO ONE! You are just regurgitating misinformation you heard somewhere else. Just stop it, Sally/Jamin/DG
The governor of Virginia Ralph Northam supports infanticide. Many Democrats are on board with killing viable babies outside the womb. What say you?
Sally Vix wrote:
Sally, you shithead wrote:
Who is supporting infanticide? NO ONE! You are just regurgitating misinformation you heard somewhere else. Just stop it, Sally/Jamin/DG
The governor of Virginia Ralph Northam supports infanticide. Many Democrats are on board with killing viable babies outside the womb. What say you?
Why the insults? You can't discuss the topic in an intelligent way? No way with the word?
Sally Vix wrote:
Sally, you shithead wrote:
Just stop it, Sally/Jamin/DG
Why the insults? You can't discuss the topic in an intelligent way? No way with the word?
Being called Jamin is quite the insult around these parts, dude.
Sally Vix wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
You have to forgive Sally, she’s used to Russia ?? where everyone has to act like they believe in the ONE way of the leader. Diversity of opinion is a hard habit to adopt. Translating the jokes can be a challenge as well.
In Russia your either Red (99%) or Black (1%). The reds eat cheap red caviar & get sunburned working the fields. The blacks eat expensive black caviar & have vacation dachas at the Black Sea, ha ha.
Nice that you brought up "diversity of opinion." Name one Democratic nominee who is against infanticide or against killing babies who are born as viable babies but survive botched abortions. Name one Democratic presidential candidate who is against infanticide. If he or she is they would never get the nomination.
You are right. There is no "diversity of opinion" among the Democrats on this topic. Every single Democratic nominee "is against infanticide (and) against killing babies who are born as viable babies but survive botched abortions."
Got us on that one - no diversity whatsoever.
Sally’s a bit overworked, they’re planning the Assange murder & it won’t be easy! Assange is a pirate just like trump, Sally, only a million times smarter & an even bigger mouth (yes, it is possible)! You know he’s going to rat ? out vladdy, donny, and (for the cherry ? on top) all the Brexiteers! Poison plus a bullet is the surest method, that’s what Hitler did! Good luck, luck babuschka!
Flagpole wrote:
Purr G. Tory wrote:
You have an obvious reading comprehension problem. I'm not even going to bother to respond since you can't even comprehend one simple statement.
Dude, I comprehend all. You said that just because she hasn't been charged with a felony doesn't mean she didn't commit a felony. That is a TRUE statement. There are people who commit felonies all the time who are never caught and never even suspected. For all we know, Hillary has committed THOUSANDS of felonies that she isn't even suspected of. HOWEVER, that's not what you were talking about. Hillary has been investigated for any suspected wrongdoing and as a result of those investigations, no charges were filed, therefore, to assert "felony" in any way with regard to her is disingenuous at best.
She didn't even have to make a plea deal to get out of being a convicted felon like Rush Limbaugh did...When Limbaugh made a plea deal regarding his potential felony drug charge, Limbaugh could not own a gun, had to undergo regular random drug testing, and had to admit he was an addict. Nice. And yet he has the nerve to continue to be self-righteous on the radio while his idiot followers eat it up.
And yes...I threw Limbaugh in there when he had nothing to do with the brow beating I was giving you. A little tangential fun on my part. Not good as far as debating goes, but I wasn't debating you. I was schooling you.
Damn. Someone certainly struck a nerve with Flagpole. You can see his blood pressure shoot up 100 points as he’s typing that. :snicker
Better make it a double. Sally needs some medical attention, raving about killing infants or some such nonsense.
Not So Fast My Friend wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Um...you know I didn't back him for President. I haven't backed anyone yet.
Here is the thing though...if I HAD backed him for President, now that we see what he's been charged with (still needs to have his day in court, but it isn't looking good for him), I would have taken back all support for him...as you Trumpers should do with The Orange One.
I once supported Bill Clinton, but after seeing who he really was, I stopped being a supporter of his. I once thought Bill Cosby seemed like a decent guy. No political person or public person deserves unfettered support.
Liar.
You did back him during short run for Prez.
I absolutely did not. You accuse...you must find proof.
Viva la vida locas wrote:
The Red Staters cherish the law. We don't want illegals here. We want immigration laws enforced. If the Blue Staters are going to get off on having illegals here, then they should bear the brunt of them.
You know, dropping off a ton of illegals in a city doesn't mean they will stay there. Trump campaigned on keeping illegals out, and now he wants to allow them in at a faster rate than ever before, setting up a situation that would encourage more to come here.
He is irrational. Just another way he has screwed you Trumpers.
This isn't going to happen, but it won't be without his trying.
Call 911 wrote:
Damn. Someone certainly struck a nerve with Flagpole. You can see his blood pressure shoot up 100 points as he’s typing that. :snicker
Nope. I don't have high blood pressure, and I am as cool as the other side of the pillow at all times. I have a benign condition that protects me from high blood pressure and heart disease as well as a few cancers.
Flagpole wrote:
Not So Fast My Friend wrote:
Liar.
You did back him during short run for Prez.
I absolutely did not. You accuse...you must find proof.
That thread has been deleted. I asked to have it reinstated, but it hasn't. I see you are now doubling down on the lie. You're down to 98% integrity 98% of the time.
Not So Fast My Friend wrote:
Liar.
You did back him during short run for Prez.
[/quote]
Here are some things I have said here about Avenatti:
May 2018 - "While I enjoy seeing Michael Avenatti on a bunch of shows slamming the President and Michael Cohen, I do find it to be a tiny bit odd.
Usually lawyers refrain from doing what he is doing. I would rather that he take a step back and just out lawyer them when it is time."
November 2018 - "I have never followed him "blindly". I NEVER do that. I didn't even "follow" him. I have not supported his potential bid for the Democrat nomination for President. I have ONLY said that he was bringing out the truth about Trump and Cohen and payments to Daniels and McDougal, and that remains true."
I could find more, but I'm not interested. Bottom line is I never backed him as a Presidential candidate...AND you can not find evidence that I did.
Now, if it were ME who were just called out like I just called you out, I would admit I was wrong.
Care to admit you were wrong? I won't hold my breath, but I will respect you if you do.
Not So Fast My Friend wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I absolutely did not. You accuse...you must find proof.
That thread has been deleted. I asked to have it reinstated, but it hasn't. I see you are now doubling down on the lie. You're down to 98% integrity 98% of the time.
Nope...no thread that I would have said such a thing has been deleted. Onus on you, brother. You accused me of saying I backed Avenatti for President. I did no such thing. I never even in my head remotely thought he would be a good president or a good candidate against Trump.
I retain 100% integrity 100% of the time...and I will always have that.
Just like in 1985 when you let Scott Fry get DQ'd.
Flagpole wrote:
Not So Fast My Friend wrote:
Liar.
You did back him during short run for Prez.
Here are some things I have said here about Avenatti:
May 2018 - "While I enjoy seeing Michael Avenatti on a bunch of shows slamming the President and Michael Cohen, I do find it to be a tiny bit odd.
Usually lawyers refrain from doing what he is doing. I would rather that he take a step back and just out lawyer them when it is time."
November 2018 - "I have never followed him "blindly". I NEVER do that. I didn't even "follow" him. I have not supported his potential bid for the Democrat nomination for President. I have ONLY said that he was bringing out the truth about Trump and Cohen and payments to Daniels and McDougal, and that remains true."
I could find more, but I'm not interested. Bottom line is I never backed him as a Presidential candidate...AND you can not find evidence that I did.
Now, if it were ME who were just called out like I just called you out, I would admit I was wrong.
Care to admit you were wrong? I won't hold my breath, but I will respect you if you do.[/quote]
I don’t admit I’m wrong when I am right.
Not So Fast My Friend wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Here are some things I have said here about Avenatti:
May 2018 - "While I enjoy seeing Michael Avenatti on a bunch of shows slamming the President and Michael Cohen, I do find it to be a tiny bit odd.
Usually lawyers refrain from doing what he is doing. I would rather that he take a step back and just out lawyer them when it is time."
November 2018 - "I have never followed him "blindly". I NEVER do that. I didn't even "follow" him. I have not supported his potential bid for the Democrat nomination for President. I have ONLY said that he was bringing out the truth about Trump and Cohen and payments to Daniels and McDougal, and that remains true."
I could find more, but I'm not interested. Bottom line is I never backed him as a Presidential candidate...AND you can not find evidence that I did.
Now, if it were ME who were just called out like I just called you out, I would admit I was wrong.
Care to admit you were wrong? I won't hold my breath, but I will respect you if you do.
I don’t admit I’m wrong when I am right.[/quote]
And even when he's wrong, he's right.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HEXuzrQpYgFlagpole’s right, that loathsome plan by a vile crook will never be implemented. Even GOP may object to transporting immigrants, as much as they’re cowards 99% of the time.
Flagpole wrote:
Viva la vida locas wrote:
The Red Staters cherish the law. We don't want illegals here. We want immigration laws enforced. If the Blue Staters are going to get off on having illegals here, then they should bear the brunt of them.
You know, dropping off a ton of illegals in a city doesn't mean they will stay there. Trump campaigned on keeping illegals out, and now he wants to allow them in at a faster rate than ever before, setting up a situation that would encourage more to come here.
He is irrational. Just another way he has screwed you Trumpers.
This isn't going to happen, but it won't be without his trying.
Dropping them off means Trump has accepted the asylum seekers live and work in the US.
PS. And Sally, posting as Viva la vida locas, continues referring to asylum seekers as illegals. Sally is an IDIOT.
jesseriley wrote:
Flagpole’s right, that loathsome plan by a vile crook will never be implemented. Even GOP may object to transporting immigrants, as much as they’re cowards 99% of the time.
Here is a map of the sanctuary cities that have the most migrants. Number ONE is Houston. Most tend to go to the red midwestern and southern states. How can that be? Because that is where they find jobs. Conservatives love hiring migrants because they are less expensive than hiring American employees, and they will do the jobs that American absolutely refuse to do.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/resizer/BhVgmd3zQIPthszCpER_FQpxTMk=/1484x0/arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/J2VH3NMSSVFHROKKNFKRCO5VKE.jpghttps://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2019/04/13/snapshot-where-migrants-go-after-release-into-united-states/Not So Fast My Friend wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Here are some things I have said here about Avenatti:
May 2018 - "While I enjoy seeing Michael Avenatti on a bunch of shows slamming the President and Michael Cohen, I do find it to be a tiny bit odd.
Usually lawyers refrain from doing what he is doing. I would rather that he take a step back and just out lawyer them when it is time."
November 2018 - "I have never followed him "blindly". I NEVER do that. I didn't even "follow" him. I have not supported his potential bid for the Democrat nomination for President. I have ONLY said that he was bringing out the truth about Trump and Cohen and payments to Daniels and McDougal, and that remains true."
I could find more, but I'm not interested. Bottom line is I never backed him as a Presidential candidate...AND you can not find evidence that I did.
Now, if it were ME who were just called out like I just called you out, I would admit I was wrong.
Care to admit you were wrong? I won't hold my breath, but I will respect you if you do.
I don’t admit I’m wrong when I am right.[/quote]
No one is asking you to. You should admit you are wrong when you are wrong, and you are wrong here. You know that a thread wasn't deleted. You then need to either prove that what you say I said is true or admit you are wrong...OR we just will all know you have no integrity.
You are wrong, brother. No shame in that, but you are wrong.
