Sally Vix wrote:
HEY SALLY!!! wrote:
HI SALLY VIX!!!
Who got banned?
Looks like you got caught trolling this forum under a new name. You claim you only use Sally Polly Fatty. That is of course a LIE.
Sally Vix wrote:
HEY SALLY!!! wrote:
HI SALLY VIX!!!
Who got banned?
Looks like you got caught trolling this forum under a new name. You claim you only use Sally Polly Fatty. That is of course a LIE.
LEGAL EAGLE wrote:
HEY SALLY!!! wrote:
And more so, once he [Trump] dumps them in the US he cannot deport them because he has willingly accepted them as asylum seekers by releasing them into the US.
That is 100% legally correct. That is a major brain-lapse idea by Trump. It is the exact opposite of what he is telling his fan he will do ... from deport immigrants ... to letting them come to and stay in America.
That is fine. Let's dump them in sanctuary cities. And California and other states will have to support them. Alas, Texas too.
LIAR SALLY wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Who got banned?
Looks like you got caught trolling this forum under a new name. You claim you only use Sally Polly Fatty. That is of course a LIE.
I said up until last week I used Fatty, Polly and Sally. I only began using the new one this week.
Sally Vix wrote:
LIAR SALLY wrote:
Looks like you got caught trolling this forum under a new name. You claim you only use Sally Polly Fatty. That is of course a LIE.
I said up until last week I used Fatty, Polly and Sally. I only began using the new one this week.
And anyone with a brain (you included) can spot me in a heartbeat. My use of CAPs, etc.
Sally Vix wrote:
LEGAL EAGLE wrote:
That is 100% legally correct. That is a major brain-lapse idea by Trump. It is the exact opposite of what he is telling his fan he will do ... from deport immigrants ... to letting them come to and stay in America.
That is fine. Let's dump them in sanctuary cities. And California and other states will have to support them. Alas, Texas too.
Actual, Trump has to pay the States to keep asylum seekers.
Sally Vix wrote:
And anyone with a brain (you included) can spot me in a heartbeat. My use of CAPs, etc.
It is your vapid posts which make you spotable.
Actual Lea wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
That is fine. Let's dump them in sanctuary cities. And California and other states will have to support them. Alas, Texas too.
Actual, Trump has to pay the States to keep asylum seekers.
But won't the states have to bear the burden of health care costs and schooling and other costs?
SPOTS wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
And anyone with a brain (you included) can spot me in a heartbeat. My use of CAPs, etc.
It is your vapid posts which make you spotable.
Nice one. Let me look up vapid.
Sally Vix wrote:
SPOTS wrote:
It is your vapid posts which make you spotable.
Nice one. Let me look up vapid.
Vapid means dull and not interesting.
Sally, do you realize that Houston has sanctuary city policies? Also, San Antonio and Dallas and Austin?
https://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/does-texas-have-any-sanctuary-cities/https://www.texastribune.org/2018/03/28/critics-texas-sanctuary-cities-law-ask-federal-appeals-court-reconside/Zero Sum wrote:
Ciro wrote:
That's fine but tell me how the tax returns of a waitrsss would prove anything?
If you've worked in the service industry you'll know that you scan just make up a number and it can't be proven or tracked.
Also the fundamental difference is that what the corporate billionaires are doing is legal thanks to the GOP.
As you stated, one broke the law and one didn't. As a Rule of Law person, my belief is that we should go after the people who break the law.
Sometimes laws are unjust a favor the wealthy, a far far cry from draining the swamp.
It's funny to see voluntary serfs dong the bidding for billionaires.
If some waitress has broke the law as you suggest then the evidence should be revealed.
Houston wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Nice one. Let me look up vapid.
Vapid means dull and not interesting.
Sally, do you realize that Houston has sanctuary city policies? Also, San Antonio and Dallas and Austin?
https://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/does-texas-have-any-sanctuary-cities/https://www.texastribune.org/2018/03/28/critics-texas-sanctuary-cities-law-ask-federal-appeals-court-reconside/
I do know that is why I said "alas." Kind of conceding it.
Sally Vix wrote:
Houston wrote:
Vapid means dull and not interesting.
Sally, do you realize that Houston has sanctuary city policies? Also, San Antonio and Dallas and Austin?
https://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/does-texas-have-any-sanctuary-cities/https://www.texastribune.org/2018/03/28/critics-texas-sanctuary-cities-law-ask-federal-appeals-court-reconside/I do know that is why I said "alas." Kind of conceding it.
And I was joking about looking up the meaning of "vapid."
LEGAL EAGLE wrote:
HEY SALLY!!! wrote:
And more so, once he [Trump] dumps them in the US he cannot deport them because he has willingly accepted them as asylum seekers by releasing them into the US.
That is 100% legally correct. That is a major brain-lapse idea by Trump. It is the exact opposite of what he is telling his fan he will do ... from deport immigrants ... to letting them come to and stay in America.
Glad someone sees through it, of course most of the idiots you support him are cheer leaders for this ultimate amnesty.
You have to forgive Sally, she’s used to Russia ?? where everyone has to act like they believe in the ONE way of the leader. Diversity of opinion is a hard habit to adopt. Translating the jokes can be a challenge as well.
In Russia your either Red (99%) or Black (1%). The reds eat cheap red caviar & get sunburned working the fields. The blacks eat expensive black caviar & have vacation dachas at the Black Sea, ha ha.
Sally Vix wrote:
HEY SALLY!!! wrote:
HI SALLY VIX!!!
Sorry you got perma-banned . . . . . AGAIN
Obama was never your president, being born in Hawaiian Kenya to a mother from Kansas Kenya.
What do you think about Fox News slamming Trump for his illegal move to dump asylum seekers in cities where Congressional Democrats live? He is going to have to pay those so-called "sanctuary" cities a lot of money for dumping those people there. And more so, once he dumps them in the US he cannot deport them because he has willingly accepted them as asylum seekers by releasing them into the US.
Who got banned? Do you support the illegals being directed to sanctuary cities to those who so dearly covet them and allowing those Red Staters who believe in the rule of law not having to support them? I think it is a slam dunk. Sanctuary cities get the illegals they so dearly covet and the law-abiding Red Staters are not forced to support them. SLAM DUNK.
You realize that they are migrants and will travel to wherever they can find work, right? The drop off point is meaningless other than being an inconvenience. If Trump is willing to pay for them to go to SF he'd be a jerk not to let them go where they want.
jesseriley wrote:
You have to forgive Sally, she’s used to Russia ?? where everyone has to act like they believe in the ONE way of the leader. Diversity of opinion is a hard habit to adopt. Translating the jokes can be a challenge as well.
In Russia your either Red (99%) or Black (1%). The reds eat cheap red caviar & get sunburned working the fields. The blacks eat expensive black caviar & have vacation dachas at the Black Sea, ha ha.
Nice that you brought up "diversity of opinion." Name one Democratic nominee who is against infanticide or against killing babies who are born as viable babies but survive botched abortions. Name one Democratic presidential candidate who is against infanticide. If he or she is they would never get the nomination.
jesseriley wrote:
You have to forgive Sally, she’s used to Russia ?? where everyone has to act like they believe in the ONE way of the leader. Diversity of opinion is a hard habit to adopt. Translating the jokes can be a challenge as well.
In Russia your either Red (99%) or Black (1%). The reds eat cheap red caviar & get sunburned working the fields. The blacks eat expensive black caviar & have vacation dachas at the Black Sea, ha ha.
Name one Democratic presidential nominee who is against infanticide. They can't be. There is no diversity on the Democratic side.
Viva la vida locas wrote:
What the What wrote:
Are those ROBBERS also ILLEGALS? How about you? Have you ever gotten a traffic ticket? Jay walked? I hope not. Because that would make YOU an ILLEGAL.
What the heck are you babbling about? If I got a traffic ticket, that is a misdemeanor. Nothing more. Jaywalking the same. Please think before you post.
Ummm . . . I'm pretty sure that something being a misdemeanor is kind of an indication that it is ILLEGAL. Which makes you an ILLEGAL according to your moronic use of the term.
Seriously, could you please try to think before posting? Or even try thinking . . . ever!
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Who got banned? Do you support the illegals being directed to sanctuary cities to those who so dearly covet them and allowing those Red Staters who believe in the rule of law not having to support them? I think it is a slam dunk. Sanctuary cities get the illegals they so dearly covet and the law-abiding Red Staters are not forced to support them. SLAM DUNK.
You realize that they are migrants and will travel to wherever they can find work, right? The drop off point is meaningless other than being an inconvenience. If Trump is willing to pay for them to go to SF he'd be a jerk not to let them go where they want.
I kind of agree on a lot what you say. I am not against migrants coming here but would love to have an orderly system and not penalize those who migrate here legally.
Sally Vix wrote:
Name one Democratic presidential candidate who is against infanticide. If he or she is they would never get the nomination.
Who is supporting infanticide? NO ONE! You are just regurgitating misinformation you heard somewhere else. Just stop it, Sally/Jamin/DG