my AR-15 doesn\'t understand that wrote:
TRUMP 2024
Yes, easy win. We may very well get Ivanka in 2028 as well. we see.
-
18
-
WOW !!! Will Jared be her VP ?? How exciting !!
10 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Faux outrage
I believe you voted for a guy because he promised to jail one of his political opponents - Lock Her Up... Lock Her Up... Does that ring a bell?
53 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
read the indictment wrote:
Maybe you are right Adult. It might go down like this:
Appeals court opening arguments:
Trump's defense attorney: Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury. The govt has the audacity to say that my client "knowingly made false claims". This is the height of absurdity. It is widely known that my client does not know his head from his Azz. How dare the govt make a claim that my client could or would know anything at all. We will demonstrate that my client is a complete imbecile and thought he won.
Judge: Defense is making a logical argument. Trump is an idiot. Go on.
Prosecution: How the hell will we fight this? WE would have to make a claim that trump is not a complete idiot. We are toast.
How do you prove that a man who has said on social media every single day for 3 years now that he thinks the election was stolen doesn't really believe it?
Hint: You can't.
What he thinks is irrelevant. The term "knowingly" has nothing to do his personal delusions.
20 -
Melania is no where to be seen supporting her husband. This is highly unusual behavior for a wife not to escort her husband in this situation. Its emotional abandonment.
But possibly Melania just heard that Justin Trudeau is available and that Donald's future isn't looking too good anymore.
10 -
Kokinho wrote:
SeattleSilver wrote:
It is an interesting indictment. I am not convinced that the DOJ will gain a conviction...
Thanks for bein honest.
Here's the thing. To all the people still saying rEaD tHe iNdiCtMeNt, if you have to tell people to read the indictment, you already lost. (And I think I've read enough of the indictment to make up my mind, but not most of it.) The Founding Fathers believed the law should be simple to understand so it can't be abused. Otherwise how can you expect the average person to follow the law? If person A murders person B, everyone can clearly see how that's a crime. But if it takes 47 pages of legalese to explain how someone broke the law then you don't have a case, you have a witch hunt, IMO. And I say this as a supporter of RFK, Jr. (D) who does not plan to vote for either of the major party frontronners, TBH politically I'd rather just see Trump go to prison so somebody can take his place but ethically/morally I don't believe in jailing political rivals and sleep well at night knowing I would never support a politically motivated witch hunt.
The only thing that stands out in this post is that you think reading 47 pages is difficult. Why would anyone respect your opinion?
91 -
i dont understand words wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Faux outrage
I believe you voted for a guy because he promised to jail one of his political opponents - Lock Her Up... Lock Her Up... Does that ring a bell?
i believe you are missing the point. No Trump voter is "outraged". what we are is dug in for the battle at the box. Trump, if you happened to see his wedding crash speech, can handle himself. I will just hit the booth with the usual pro #2 support myself, and i dont see the current bribe taker on my side. so be it. another year, another vote. through it all, the biggest loser is DeSantis. He had it made, and now, he is toast. I would need to write in Trump if the Government deals me that hand. because when it comes to the choice between 2 #2 supporters, then i go to the next criteria. insider vs outsider. gotta take the outsider.
08 -
Noyankee wrote:
my AR-15 doesn\'t understand that wrote:
TRUMP 2024
Yes, easy win. We may very well get Ivanka in 2028 as well. we see.
And after Ivanka's terms, it's going to be Don, Jr. for two terms, and then Eric for two terms, and I believe, that after Eric serves his terms, Barron will be old enough to hold office.
THE TRUMP DYNASTY IS JUST BEGINNING!!!
11 -
Camelot II wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
Yes, easy win. We may very well get Ivanka in 2028 as well. we see.
And after Ivanka's terms, it's going to be Don, Jr. for two terms, and then Eric for two terms, and I believe, that after Eric serves his terms, Barron will be old enough to hold office.
THE TRUMP DYNASTY IS JUST BEGINNING!!!
HA! can you imagine how the freak show would handle that hand? wow. they are already unglued, its hard to imagine what they would do. that would be so much fun, and we keep the court and the first and second amendments. double bonus.
07 -
The best part about all of this is that Trump is almost openly having an affair with the "lawyer" he chose to represent him: a bimbo with giant tits and basically no other qualifications.
20 -
Noyankee wrote:
i dont understand words wrote:
Faux outrage
I believe you voted for a guy because he promised to jail one of his political opponents - Lock Her Up... Lock Her Up... Does that ring a bell?
i believe you are missing the point. No Trump voter is "outraged". what we are is dug in for the battle at the box. Trump, if you happened to see his wedding crash speech, can handle himself. I will just hit the booth with the usual pro #2 support myself, and i dont see the current bribe taker on my side. so be it. another year, another vote. through it all, the biggest loser is DeSantis. He had it made, and now, he is toast. I would need to write in Trump if the Government deals me that hand. because when it comes to the choice between 2 #2 supporters, then i go to the next criteria. insider vs outsider. gotta take the outsider.
Here's the problem.
He convinced you that he was going "to drain the swamp" because knows, better than anyone, how the game was played. He told you he's the ultimate insider. You applauded him for that.
My guess is that, he's an outsider when you need him to be an outsider and he's an insider when you need him to be an insider. You're about as principled as he is. Which is why he's your guy.
40 -
Noyankee wrote:
Camelot II wrote:
And after Ivanka's terms, it's going to be Don, Jr. for two terms, and then Eric for two terms, and I believe, that after Eric serves his terms, Barron will be old enough to hold office.
THE TRUMP DYNASTY IS JUST BEGINNING!!!
HA! can you imagine how the freak show would handle that hand? wow. they are already unglued, its hard to imagine what they would do. that would be so much fun, and we keep the court and the first and second amendments. double bonus.
Sarcasm detector not working today, bright boy?
30 -
If Trump is indicted for lying about election results, don't we have to charge Biden similarly for lying that Hunter laptop is Russian disinfo.
26 -
Noyankee wrote:
Camelot II wrote:
And after Ivanka's terms, it's going to be Don, Jr. for two terms, and then Eric for two terms, and I believe, that after Eric serves his terms, Barron will be old enough to hold office.
THE TRUMP DYNASTY IS JUST BEGINNING!!!
HA! can you imagine how the freak show would handle that hand? wow. they are already unglued, its hard to imagine what they would do. that would be so much fun, and we keep the court and the first and second amendments. double bonus.
Unglued is a perfect description of the two posts above.
20 -
jonesy22 wrote:
If Trump is indicted for lying about election results, don't we have to charge Biden similarly for lying that Hunter laptop is Russian disinfo.
Pretty lame, Milhouse. We are 3 days into this stuff, and that's the best thing you could find on Twitter? Come on, man.
62 -
Commode flusher wrote:
jonesy22 wrote:
If Trump is indicted for lying about election results, don't we have to charge Biden similarly for lying that Hunter laptop is Russian disinfo.
Pretty lame, Milhouse. We are 3 days into this stuff, and that's the best thing you could find on Twitter? Come on, man.
Oh, so you can't argue the facts? We all know the laptop is Hunter's. And Biden lied about it in the debate. That lie should be charged according to idiots like you.
15 -
Noyankee wrote:
RossiCheated wrote:
Disagreement is criminal when it involves conspiracy, interfering in government activity, and attempts to defraud the American people, etc.
We have already seen that disagreement is criminal when it involves trespassing, smashing windows, beating police officers with flag poles and spraying them with bear spray, etc.
No clue what you’re talking about. I clearly remember Trump telling people carrying flags to to go home.
I'm sure that you would be eager, proud even, to share with us what time of day he told the "people carrying flags" to go home.
Then we could examine the full context by considering what had been happening at the Capitol for the minutes, even hours, prior to that message, and we could determine whether the Commander in Chief had acted reasonably and in a timely fashion to uphold his oath to the Constitution.
When, to the minute, did he send that valuable message?
41 -
jonesy22 wrote:
If Trump is indicted for lying about election results, don't we have to charge Biden similarly for lying that Hunter laptop is Russian disinfo.
Another clueless wanker that thinks Trump has been indicted for “lying” about the results. It’s more than that, you obtuse dolt.
#buddddwahadddabbbout?
31 -
i dont understand words wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
How do you prove that a man who has said on social media every single day for 3 years now that he thinks the election was stolen doesn't really believe it?
Hint: You can't.
What he thinks is irrelevant. The term "knowingly" has nothing to do his personal delusions.
Ironic that you don't understand the legal definition of knowingly given your chosen screen name.
06 -
RossiCheated wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
No clue what you’re talking about. I clearly remember Trump telling people carrying flags to to go home.
I'm sure that you would be eager, proud even, to share with us what time of day he told the "people carrying flags" to go home.
Then we could examine the full context by considering what had been happening at the Capitol for the minutes, even hours, prior to that message, and we could determine whether the Commander in Chief had acted reasonably and in a timely fashion to uphold his oath to the Constitution.
When, to the minute, did he send that valuable message?
When, to the minute, did he tell them to go into the Capitol?
04
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.