I'm an idiot and fail to see this is what me and my LR liberal friends do all the time. It's really sad because we lack discussion skills so resort to this. When conservatives do it, we give it a thumbs down. When liberals do it, we give it a thumbs up. We think we are so clever. We pretend we don't do it all the time, but we do. I am pretending to not know this but I do.
"Via" - why do you care more about birds than Americans?
Haven't you noticed? 90% of LR is a liberal weak-body. They gave that clown 10 thumbs ups for being anti-bird. It's retarded. You'll never win with these idiot sheep.
Endangered Species Act was signed into law by Republican Richard Nixon.
Why do Democrats care about endangered birds now?
They don’t. They care about funding Somalian terrorists. Birds are a diversion. Democrats are fighting like heil to preserve the fraud and set up a little Mogadishu sister city in America protected by our weak Americans in Minn…but the strong Americans are not having it. We will not fund Somalia no matter how much they kick n scream, nor how many victims they put out there to get killed.
Correct. They also defend terrorists, Jihad, liberal agitator lunatics, dictators (how ironic) and the burning down of cities and car companies.
When asked why America needs Greenland so badly, trump replied that it's "Psychologically important for me." 🌝
He describes very clearly the necessity for strategic military advantage over Russia and China and why the location is important, moron.
If you knew history you would know that a pact that was signed in 1951 by the United States and Denmark would allow U.S. has such a free hand in Greenland that it can build all of the bases that it wants to in Greenland, moron.
So if the US can do that, what necessitates the needs to acquire Greenland? Could it be the minerals and natural resources that Greenland has? Trump tells us that it is vital for the national security of the US but the fact that the US can put all of the military installations it want to in Greenland invalidates that argument.
Attention libs, you cannot block the streets if you want to protest. Stand on the sidewalks and exercise your 1st Amendment rights there. Learn to protest LAWFULLY.
Thank you.
🚨 JUST IN: ICE RIPPED a woman from her car in Minneapolis after she BLOCKED them from driving down the road
He describes very clearly the necessity for strategic military advantage over Russia and China and why the location is important, moron.
If you knew history you would know that a pact that was signed in 1951 by the United States and Denmark would allow U.S. has such a free hand in Greenland that it can build all of the bases that it wants to in Greenland, moron.
So if the US can do that, what necessitates the needs to acquire Greenland? Could it be the minerals and natural resources that Greenland has? Trump tells us that it is vital for the national security of the US but the fact that the US can put all of the military installations it want to in Greenland invalidates that argument.
Sheeple believe anything that Trump tells them.
Having a treaty that allows bases is very different from owning the land. Ownership means political control, sovereignty, domestic law, citizenship, resources, taxation, and much more — something the U.S. does not currently have and cannot get just because of a defense agreement, moron.
Attention libs, you cannot block the streets if you want to protest. Stand on the sidewalks and exercise your 1st Amendment rights there. Learn to protest LAWFULLY.
narrating the comics: in this comic a government man is choking a woman, saying "don't you get it, lady, if we don't hunt them, the immigrants will kill you......"
He describes very clearly the necessity for strategic military advantage over Russia and China and why the location is important, moron.
If you knew history you would know that a pact that was signed in 1951 by the United States and Denmark would allow U.S. has such a free hand in Greenland that it can build all of the bases that it wants to in Greenland, moron.
So if the US can do that, what necessitates the needs to acquire Greenland? Could it be the minerals and natural resources that Greenland has? Trump tells us that it is vital for the national security of the US but the fact that the US can put all of the military installations it want to in Greenland invalidates that argument.
Sheeple believe anything that Trump tells them.
this is actually incorrect. the US is allowed the bases to which they and denmark agree. i think you're missing where half the point is, to secure this access, we had to make a treaty. this is because one of the two owns the place and the other is a tenant/ally.
kind of like we made treaties with native americans about our presence or relationship, because, duh, they were there first.
let's be real. as i said in the other thread, the "security" rationale is generally fake, and at best only exists as some sort of Risk boardgame tabletop theory. would like greenland for theoretical reasons. there is no imminent threat. there is no practical reason to send a bunch of troops or add bases on a big old island of ice, that no one wants to attack anytime soon -- other than, ironically, perhaps us.
no, the reason you'd invade is cheap access to real estate and minerals in the ground and offshore, as the land unfreezes during climate change.
which, ironically, one reason we'd not admit that angle, is their half the country has taken the position climate change is fake.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
