Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Paddington wrote:

Let them see it wrote:

I'm for letting it all be seen.

I'm also interested in an investigation into the DOJ/FBI.

yep. don't know any trump supporters who are against the mueller report being made public or care whether or not his tax returns go to congress. we all know what will happen. they will be nit-picked even if there are no issues with either one. it's all political theater. dems are just too dumb to see what the dem leaders and media are doing. sheep with no independent thought. it's a shame that a large segment of the population is led around like this.

For the record, 70% of Republicans don't support the efforts to turn trump's tax forms over to Congress.

That's not to release them to the public - that's just for congress to get them. I'm sure far fewer would support public release.

What else you got? Anything on the moon landing and Republicans, maybe?

Trump tweeted a graphic shown by Lou Dobbs that a poll had calculated an approval rating of 55%. The actual number was 43%.

Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) Tweeted:

Great news!

https://t.co/haZ1HbVpNu

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1116299933563478017?s=17

It wasn't Rassmussen, so most people would have been skeptical, but not Trump. He would have believed it if the number was 65%. How can the POTUS not have his tweets reviewed by someone? It would taken 2 minutes for someone to check the poll. These are presidential communications.

We know he can’t read letters; I guess numerals are also too tough.

Some observations:

1. The FBI was surely investigating Trump and the Trump campaign. Why wouldn’t they be? If the intel agencies are concerned about Russian interference then it makes sense to look into people with Russian ties and shady characters. Manafort and Stone have been shady for decades. Trump Org has a lot of Russian ties and possible Russian mob ties. These are facts. They are indisputable. If you dispute these connections please say so.

2. Trump taxes are likely to show he doesn’t make as much as he says and that he doesn’t pay much in taxes because he’s smart and has good lawyers.

3. Mueller report will likely show inconclusive evidence of conspiracy and obstruction. It’s all shady, but inconclusive.

Neither 1. 2 or 3 will change 2020. It’s also not enough for impeachment. So it’s just political theater.

I don’t see any conceivable way in which Trump’s avg across all polls approval/disapproval gap gets under the 3-4% it needs to be to be within the polling margin of error. I also predict it will get worse before it gets better due to a slowing economy, continuing cabinet turnover, flagging Congressional Republican support, and the constant negative press brought by the House Dems.

He can’t win with 40-45% support....unless the Dem candidate is equally as hated (HRC).

Alan

Alan,

It is very likely that the democrat candidate will be equally hated. Not a Trump fan but he is no doubt winning in 2020.

You might remember that a New York Times investigation recently documented a number of illegal tax schemes that Trump and his family have engaged in. Upon receiving notification that she was going to be investigated for violating rules of judicial conduct in order to fraudulently enrich herself and her brother, Trump's sister promptly retired in order to avoid misconduct proceedings. Honest taxpayers will now be paying her hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to provide her with a comfortable retirement.

Obama would've been impeached over this. With Trump, it's barely even news.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/us/maryanne-trump-barry-misconduct-inquiry.html

You say (possible) inconclusive evidence of conspiracy and obstruction are not enough for impeachment but you have to think the crimes that are putting Cohen in jail are good enough for impeachment.

And you don't need the Mueller Report for that.

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

You might remember that a New York Times investigation recently documented a number of illegal tax schemes that Trump and his family have engaged in. Upon receiving notification that she was going to be investigated for violating rules of judicial conduct in order to fraudulently enrich herself and her brother, Trump's sister promptly retired in order to avoid misconduct proceedings. Honest taxpayers will now be paying her hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to provide her with a comfortable retirement.

Obama would've been impeached over this. With Trump, it's barely even news.

ml

It ain't over. NYS is looking into this hard.

we'll see. The pendulum effect in presidential politics will often bring up someone opposite to the incumbent. If you go through history it's back and forth, back and forth. A guy like Biden or Beto or Amy would not be hated like Trump - he or she would be a symbol of good government and a return to normalcy after a period of insanity.

But if the dems elect a socialist jewish guy with a NYC accent who wants to shake things up...ach that would be awful. Bernie would be hated.

Silly Willy wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

It's time for some Trumper logic.

Yesterday, Barr said this in his hearing:

Since there is no evidence of anything improper, nothing improper occurred. Therefore, the investigation into spying on the Trump campaign is an illegal "shallow state" conspiracy.

The statement was about whether or not he would "cite" the evidence in that forum, not if there was any.

Does TDS also destroy basic reading comprehension?

I looked up TDS and it, more or less, means an irrational hatred of Trump. Trump is an absolutely vile human being and I can't think of a single thing to like about him. I don't like his policies so why the eff wouldn't I hate him. There is nothing irrational about that. If a Democrat had Trump's personality, Trumpers would hate him just as much.

Runningart2004 wrote:

2. Trump taxes are likely to show he doesn’t make as much as he says and that he doesn’t pay much in taxes because he’s smart and has good lawyers.

They also would potentially show significant foreign financial ties with, for instance, Saudi Arabia.

Silly Willy wrote:

agip wrote:

So, again, can any Trumpers explain how a border wall will stop thousands of people legally asking border agents for asylum at the border? Anyone?

If not, you should understand that Trump is using you by feeding you lies day after day. Dems know this, most Is know this...but Rs don't yet.

Are you retarded, or 12 years old?

No one said it stops anyone from asking for asylum. But it is then under control, and there's a line WHERE THERE SHOULD BE A LINE. From that point, you deal with the numbers as appropriate. It forces you to.

Aren't you sick of hearing the same BS about "immigration reform" over and over and over every four years? Let's get the controls in place so we can strategically implement the rules.

There is a line now exactly where you are asking there to be one. Pay attention or perhaps better yet, stop trolling.

Don't be so sure... wrote:

Not a Trump fan but he is no doubt winning in 2020.

Meh. I think there's some doubt.

I think he's at least as likely to be re-elected as not, though. Incumbency is a big plus, and the media--they won't be able to resist--will once again give him billions of dollars' worth of free pub. If you're gonna beat that, best take your lunch.

agip wrote:

It ain't over. NYS is looking into this hard.

I think there are statute-of-limitation problems there.

trsjtt wrote:

agip wrote:

It ain't over. NYS is looking into this hard.

I think there are statute-of-limitation problems there.

Not in the case of intentional fraud.

Monkeys typing wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

2. Trump taxes are likely to show he doesn’t make as much as he says and that he doesn’t pay much in taxes because he’s smart and has good lawyers.

They also would potentially show significant foreign financial ties with, for instance, Saudi Arabia.

meh. Trump just doesn't want tax experts tearing apart his returns. We all know he has cheated on his taxes for decades, and he doesn't want more of that to come out into the open.

Any revelations won't be shocking like Saudi or Russian money...they will be run of the mill theft. Petty, garbage theft. Just the stupidest thieving.

he probably has 100 LLCs and off shore corporations to hide money in..that stuff will never be sorted out. not really possible.

Although it's possible that one of his tax people made a stupid mistake and revealed something. If you want to get cloak and dagger...it's possible that a mistake would reveal the source of russian money he used. That's an outside thing tho.

The thing is that Spanky, dumb as he is, knows tax is one thing that could bring him down. So he will fight hard to keep that genie in the bottle.

Greg Craig has been just indicted. Sam Patten is scheduled to be sentenced tomorrow. Are Tony Podesta and Vin Weber next?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/former-obama-lawyer-craig-charged-mueller-spin-off-185905689.html

No. 2016 was a historic occurrence in which both candidates had favorable numbers under 50%.

He won’t win in 2020. He hasn’t increased his base. If he does the same demographically he loses because of the changing demographics. Basically he needs more non-white and younger votes. He won’t get them. Therefore he loses.

Alan

He has zero chance of being elected. His approval is under water in the states he needs to win (WI, MI, PA). His approval has gotten worse in EVERY state. These are the facts and they are indisputable. The GOP has already read the tea leaves. Those up for re-election are already coming out against him in instances of Trump Insanity Talk.

Alan