Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

food stamp henny wrote:

Funny on Morning Joe this morning they were talking about Israel and how it was relatively safe today. I think it was Richard Hass who maybe inadvertently said that their wall (Israels') works. All you idiot liberals who insist that a wall would not work on the southern border are just that - idiots. The Israeli wall cut down illegal crossings by 98%. To say that a similar wall (sure it is much longer) would not help stem the illegal crossings are plain and simple idiots. Walls do work. Why are there walls everywhere? Because they work!!!

Sounds like you have absolutely zero idea of how US asylum law works.

This wave of immigrants are literally presenting themselves to border agents at the border. The border agents by law must process them as asylum seekers.

The israel comparison is stupid, especially for that reason.

Does China allow asylum seekers to just present themselves at the Chinese border? What other country allows this? China cracks down on this stuff. Should America not do the same?

Just say NO to immigration!!!!

food stamp henny wrote:

agip wrote:

Any Trumpers want to explain to me how a continuous border wall would stop these thousands of Central Americans from legally presenting themselves at the border and asking for asylum?

Anyone? Any ideas?

Funny on Morning Joe this morning they were talking about Israel and how it was relatively safe today. I think it was Richard Hass who maybe inadvertently said that their wall (Israels') works. All you idiot liberals who insist that a wall would not work on the southern border are just that - idiots. The Israeli wall cut down illegal crossings by 98%. To say that a similar wall (sure it is much longer) would not help stem the illegal crossings are plain and simple idiots. Walls do work. Why are there walls everywhere? Because they work!!!

lol Israel isn't "safe" because of a wall. They're safe because they have marginalized and ghettoized millions of Palestinians for decades with the military and intelligence support from the US.

Racket wrote:

food stamp henny wrote:

Funny on Morning Joe this morning they were talking about Israel and how it was relatively safe today. I think it was Richard Hass who maybe inadvertently said that their wall (Israels') works. All you idiot liberals who insist that a wall would not work on the southern border are just that - idiots. The Israeli wall cut down illegal crossings by 98%. To say that a similar wall (sure it is much longer) would not help stem the illegal crossings are plain and simple idiots. Walls do work. Why are there walls everywhere? Because they work!!!

lol Israel isn't "safe" because of a wall. They're safe because they have marginalized and ghettoized millions of Palestinians for decades with the military and intelligence support from the US.

Blah blah blah blah blah. Stop listening to MSNBC.

Authority wrote:

Mnuchin has no say. The president does not have power to write or interpret laws. Congress has that power.

He has enough of a say to not turn over the returns sending into the court system where it will take it's time winding through.

You’ll have to ask the millions of Chinese who have come here. Pretty short line at their border.

Too young wrote:

agip wrote:

Sounds like you have absolutely zero idea of how US asylum law works.

This wave of immigrants are literally presenting themselves to border agents at the border. The border agents by law must process them as asylum seekers.

The israel comparison is stupid, especially for that reason.

Does China allow asylum seekers to just present themselves at the Chinese border? What other country allows this? China cracks down on this stuff. Should America not do the same?

Any country that signed the agreement on asylum that came from the 1951 convention has the same law. However, there is no way to punish a government that does not live up to its 1951 agreement. So yeah, China has said it will follow the same law and the US. Does it? I don't know.

This is where spankism is leading us though - to people saying 'hey why can't we be total b@st@rds and act like China and Russia? Trump literally said this week that he wished he could have an outlaw rogue army that treated asylum seekers roughly. This is how the US will fall from a leadership position in the world.

Here's the list of nations that have signed the agreement.

It's time for some Trumper logic. Yesterday, Barr said this in his hearing:

SEN. JACK REED (D-RI): Have you any evidence that there was anything improper in those investigations?

BARR: I have no specific evidence that I would cite right now.

Since there is no evidence of anything improper, nothing improper occurred. Therefore, the investigation into spying on the Trump campaign is an illegal "shallow state" conspiracy.

food stamp henny wrote:

agip wrote:

Any Trumpers want to explain to me how a continuous border wall would stop these thousands of Central Americans from legally presenting themselves at the border and asking for asylum?

Anyone? Any ideas?

Funny on Morning Joe this morning they were talking about Israel and how it was relatively safe today. I think it was Richard Hass who maybe inadvertently said that their wall (Israels') works. All you idiot liberals who insist that a wall would not work on the southern border are just that - idiots. The Israeli wall cut down illegal crossings by 98%. To say that a similar wall (sure it is much longer) would not help stem the illegal crossings are plain and simple idiots. Walls do work. Why are there walls everywhere? Because they work!!!

You IDIOT. The Israeli wall is a wire fence. Israel has armed guards every kilometer. The guards are what keep people out. That wall is less of a wall than the un-walled Rio Grande.

Some of what you say is sensible and reasonable. But is Cambodia allowing in millions of immigrants? Is Mexico allowing in millions of immigrants? Is Turkey allowing in millions of immigrants? Is India allowing in millions of immigrants? Is the Sudan allowing in millions of immigrants? None are. Why must the US be the only country that allows in millions of immigrants? We are already overburdened. Must we be overburdened even more?

So, again, can any Trumpers explain how a border wall will stop thousands of people legally asking border agents for asylum at the border? Anyone?

If not, you should understand that Trump is using you by feeding you lies day after day. Dems know this, most Is know this...but Rs don't yet.

The Fokus wrote:

Authority wrote:

Mnuchin has no say. The president does not have power to write or interpret laws. Congress has that power.

He has enough of a say to not turn over the returns sending into the court system where it will take it's time winding through.

^ A truly desperate Trumpkin.

Thanks.

Mexico is allowing in hundreds of thousands of immigrants, yes. Canada is, Germany is, France is, the Scandinavian countries are hitting way above their belt. UK. You are severely mistaken if you think the US is the only country taking in large numbers of immigrants. Probably every rich country is, as a percentage of its population.

Must we do more? Well if we want to have a growing population, yes. Without a ton of immigrants the US population will soon shrink, and that would be very very bad. Your taxes would skyrocket, for one.

Do we have any Liberal posters here that are man or woman enough to admit to any of the following (we still have ZERO that have done so to any of the following, which is amazing):

1) Your party leadership and the MSM lied to you by pushing a false narrative about Russian Collusion to hurt the President. (While doing so, they neglected their own stated objective and commitment to the country to report critical news and policy developments.)

2) You were willing to overlook the lack of factual evidence of Russian collusion, in favor of hope and speculation against the President, purely because it was a drag on his administration. You put party over country to support your tribe.

3) You ignored and/or are still currently ignoring the mound of facts and evidence that exposed an anti-Trump conspiracy that was carried out by the leadership of the DOJ & FBI to hurt the President. (In fairness, if you truly did not read any non-Leftwing news outlets, you may not even know about what occurred.)

Massive props to the first Liberal who admits to all three. But seriously, I really think acknowledging at least one of these is a HUGE first step toward recovery.

Fat hurts wrote:

It's time for some Trumper logic.

Yesterday, Barr said this in his hearing:

SEN. JACK REED (D-RI): Have you any evidence that there was anything improper in those investigations?

BARR: I have no specific evidence that I would cite right now.

Since there is no evidence of anything improper, nothing improper occurred. Therefore, the investigation into spying on the Trump campaign is an illegal "shallow state" conspiracy.

No. Slow down a bit. Barr said that there was no specific evidence that he could cite now. That he could cite NOW. So, he maybe will be citing evidence tomorrow or next week or next month. Should be quite entertaining.

The Fokus wrote:

Authority wrote:

Mnuchin has no say. The president does not have power to write or interpret laws. Congress has that power.

He has enough of a say to not turn over the returns sending into the court system where it will take it's time winding through.

Executive orders have the force of law. So essentially they are laws. Dunce hat for the person who said that.

agip wrote:

So, again, can any Trumpers explain how a border wall will stop thousands of people legally asking border agents for asylum at the border? Anyone?

If not, you should understand that Trump is using you by feeding you lies day after day. Dems know this, most Is know this...but Rs don't yet.

Are you retarded, or 12 years old?

No one said it stops anyone from asking for asylum. But it is then under control, and there's a line WHERE THERE SHOULD BE A LINE. From that point, you deal with the numbers as appropriate. It forces you to.

Aren't you sick of hearing the same BS about "immigration reform" over and over and over every four years? Let's get the controls in place so we can strategically implement the rules.

I think Trump's chances of being re-elected are increasing.

Ironically, because of all of the potential charges against him.

In his first months there were so many wrong things he was doing that an investigation was started.

An that investigation unveiled numerous more bad things.

That he survived two years of onslaught and now is four months into a year where Democrats took the House without voting on impeachment.

All of that bad stuff is falling right off him and his cries of witch hunt are solidifying his base.

He placed Barr to block the Mueller report and Mnuchin to block his tax returns release.

And has gotten almost every single Republican in Congress to have his back.

He did build his wall. A wall of Republicans that will stand in the way of any investigations into any potential wrongdoing by him.

It may play out that Florida determines the election all by itself again.

Of course there is a view that it all falls apart and he loses FL, OH, AZ, PA, MI, WI, NC and GA.

Fat hurts wrote:

It's time for some Trumper logic.

Yesterday, Barr said this in his hearing:

SEN. JACK REED (D-RI): Have you any evidence that there was anything improper in those investigations?

BARR: I have no specific evidence that I would cite right now.

Since there is no evidence of anything improper, nothing improper occurred. Therefore, the investigation into spying on the Trump campaign is an illegal "shallow state" conspiracy.

The statement was about whether or not he would "cite" the evidence in that forum, not if there was any.

Does TDS also destroy basic reading comprehension?