agip wrote:
errrrr. but wrote:
But, but, but colllluuuussssioooonnnnnnn.
The Mueller report made it clear that the Russians worked to help Trump win the election.
It's clear that Trump lied to cover up his business interests in Russia.
It's also clear that the Trump campaign wanted to collude with Russia, and tried at least twice to do so. Once in a meeting with russian intelligence, another time the head of the trump campaign handed over internal polling data to russian intelligence.
It’s clear that the Trumpers knew beforehand when Russia would release a dump of stolen emails via Wikileaks.
It's also clear that many people on the trump campaign lied when they denied contacts with Russia, including the President, his son and the National Security Advisor.
It's also clear that Trump told the world he fired the FBI director in order to stop an investigation into his connections with Russia.
We also know Trump gave the Russians classified material, that not even our allies get.
I'll call that collusion. You call it Republican behavior. Shows what degenerates Spankists are.
You can call it a peanut butter sandwich until you bite into it and it tastes like manure.
All of those things happened yet Mueller concluded there was not enough evidence. Why is that? This is why we need the report. There can be evidence of wrong doing workout the corroboration needed to pursue it further. That I think should be the take away. The government never loses a criminal case because it only pursues home runs. The case wasn’t a home run because of the inability to prove intent. It was equally likely the campaign was just inept fools just along for the ride.
Alan