Kinstler’s article in the Times magazine is an interesting snapshot of views of the administration’s pursuit of that it casts as a realist foreign policy and a pursuit of power with clear and somewhat justifiable antecedents in American history. Another take is from Prof of international security Patrick Porter.
“For Porter, it is not realism that defines the Trump era but rather its ‘corrupt cousin,’ machtpolitik, which pursues power for its own sake and is defined by a ‘sort of violent exhilaration of destruction, nihilism and vengeance.’
Trump’s penchant for theatrics and bombast, his obsession with status, and his use of power to enrich himself and his family — all these are characteristic elements of this darker ideology. Machtpolitik is realism gone wrong, the kind of phenomenon that it was ostensibly invented to prevent.
‘By losing all restraints, you destroy yourself,’ Porter said. The perpetual threat of machtpolitik is why, he says, ‘realists can never relax, never just sit back when people invoke the philosophy for the sake of imperial hubris.’”
Elsewhere the article makes a passing reference to a point many people know: that the president’s message resonates with many voters because they see in the view of realism the way power is often wielded against them and their interests, along with how other politicians’ messages seem to distort this. The president’s worldview therefore rings more true to them.
I think those who really loathe the president often cast him as truly evil in looking for destruction or nihilism, and that’s a simplistic bit of villain construction. I would say that many of his personal shortcomings just lend themselves to the greater problems of machtpolitik — in the sense that “power corrupts” and hardly anyone has the armor to withstand corruption, he merely arrived on the scene with more previous corruption of character and less ability to slow a rapid descent into worse.