Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

itsbaddude wrote:

You are making things up. There is no evidence because there is no crime. The leftist are trying to overthrow Trump. They dig to find something to then come up with a crime.

There is no crime. They are looking for evidence to a crime that does not exists yet.

Did you not see my post above?

We already know about crimes that were committed. Flynn admitted to felonies. We have his signature. Manifort's spokesman admitted to Manifort's felonies. Kushner's spokesman said he did commit a felony but it was an honest mistake because he forgot about all his Russian contacts.

If prosecutors were done, they could indict all three today. But there is a lot more to investigate before that happens.

"...in the end.(?)"

You think the libbbtwats got clobbered the last election cycle❗️ by 2018 a libbbtwat won't be qualified to run for a seat on a local PTA Board😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

The whimpers by the libbbtwats here is a fitting end to their pathetic exhistence. 👍

Now do as I command libbbtwats and continued your meltdown while President Trump continues to MAGA❗️😎🇺🇸

54re wrote:

Phife wrote:

Substitute what you call political correctness for dignity, respectfulness, wisdom. Trump has none of these.

I will substitute it for fake respectfulness, greed and lust for power over other people.

"Fake respectfulness" - hard to fake it your whole life in Obama's case

"Greed" -for what? Certainly not money, as Obama/Hillary could have made a lot more outside of politics

"Power over others" It comes with being POTUS.

Maybe your thinking of Trump?

And yes, Bill Clinton and Trump have degraded the Presidency. Trump alot more because he's incompetent on top of his low character.

Phife wrote:

54re wrote:

I will substitute it for fake respectfulness, greed and lust for power over other people.

"Fake respectfulness" - hard to fake it your whole life in Obama's case

"Greed" -for what? Certainly not money, as Obama/Hillary could have made a lot more outside of politics

"Power over others" It comes with being POTUS.

Maybe your thinking of Trump?

And yes, Bill Clinton and Trump have degraded the Presidency. Trump alot more because he's incompetent on top of his low character.

Keep your tears a flowing you snowflake😂😂😂😂

That is what I like to see, as I command, libbbtwats continuing their epic mEltDOwN😭.

Haaaa haaa haaa you fckers all lost😎🇺🇸👍

Fats come on, you are slipping. You forgot that Sessions also lied to cover up his meetings with Russian intelligence. I think he lied twice in fact.

Agip, we have already determined that you aren't very good at "thinking."

Remember when you "thought" DJT had zero chance to be POTUS😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂❗️

exthrower wrote:

The FBI investigation is almost one year old and NO evidence of ANY collusion....The ONLY crime that we KNOW happened is the leaking to the media of Flynn's name(by a Democrat)....

3 supena's were issued this week to Obama employees to testify to Congress....This is taking an ugly turn for the Dimms...

Nunes?

Flynn?

Kushner?

How's that health care bill going?

What about that Muslim ban?

How's that wall going? Mexico send the check yet?

Trump? Top Trump staff caught off-guard by NATO speech: Mr. Impulsivity FTW. What's needed is some more golf and junk food.

5560

Trumpettes are NOT Americans!

Eric a blair wrote:

Fats come on, you are slipping. You forgot that Sessions also lied to cover up his meetings with Russian intelligence. I think he lied twice in fact.

In Sessions' case, it's not so clear that he committed a crime. Sessions did correct the record of his congressional testimony (eventually). It would be hard to convict him based on what is in the public record.

It's pretty clear that Flynn, Kushner, and Manifort all committed felonies.

My point is that the evidence against those three is clear and public. People need to stop claiming that there is no evidence of crimes. Heck, in Flynn's case we even have a signed confession.

Fat hurts wrote:

Eric a blair wrote:

Fats come on, you are slipping. You forgot that Sessions also lied to cover up his meetings with Russian intelligence. I think he lied twice in fact.

In Sessions' case, it's not so clear that he committed a crime. Sessions did correct the record of his congressional testimony (eventually). It would be hard to convict him based on what is in the public record.

It's pretty clear that Flynn, Kushner, and Manifort all committed felonies.

My point is that the evidence against those three is clear and public. People need to stop claiming that there is no evidence of crimes. Heck, in Flynn's case we even have a signed confession.

Sessions lied twice -

first in the confirmation hearings

then again on his security clearance form

sure there are extenuating circumstances, but let it be known to all that Sessions hid his meetings with Russian intelligence officers.

eric a blair wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

In Sessions' case, it's not so clear that he committed a crime. Sessions did correct the record of his congressional testimony (eventually). It would be hard to convict him based on what is in the public record.

It's pretty clear that Flynn, Kushner, and Manifort all committed felonies.

My point is that the evidence against those three is clear and public. People need to stop claiming that there is no evidence of crimes. Heck, in Flynn's case we even have a signed confession.

Sessions lied twice -

first in the confirmation hearings

then again on his security clearance form

sure there are extenuating circumstances, but let it be known to all that Sessions hid his meetings with Russian intelligence officers.

You're right that I am slipping. I was not aware of Sessions' own problems with the security clearance form. But in Sessions' case, he was apparently instructed by the FBI that he could omit any foreign contacts that were a result of senate business. If that's true, he's probably off the hook.

exthrower wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

again, for the sixth time, the evidence has not been made public. The FBI could have a signed affidavit from Rump swearing he took bribes from Putin's personal checking account and we would not know it.

THe fact that republicans in the house and republicans in the senate are investigating Trump and his people tells you that there is something to all this.

It may not be collusion of course.

Dude....The director of the National Intelligence Agency, James Clapper, testified under oath 2 weeks ago that he has seen no evidence of collusion.....The NIA is undoubtedly part of the investigation and Clapper knows everything that's going on...Jeez...Yer graspin at straws.....

Clapper does not know everything that's going on. He retired at the end of Obama's term.

Fat hurts wrote:

exthrower wrote:

Dude....The director of the National Intelligence Agency, James Clapper, testified under oath 2 weeks ago that he has seen no evidence of collusion.....The NIA is undoubtedly part of the investigation and Clapper knows everything that's going on...Jeez...Yer graspin at straws.....

Clapper does not know everything that's going on. He retired at the end of Obama's term.

the current head of the NSA will testify on Wed, then Comey is on Thursday.

Clapper was head of it during the Obama admin, and he was very alarmed by what he was seeing regarding russia and the trumpers. He is hardly the guy you want to be quoting.

Here's Clapper:

ASHINGTON — Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on Sunday said that his "dashboard warning light was clearly on" when asked about whether he knew about communications between Russians and White House senior adviser and President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner.

"I have to say that, without specifically affirming or confirming these conversations — since, even though they're in the public realm, they're still classified — just from a theoretical standpoint, I will tell you that my dashboard warning light was clearly on and I think that was the case with all of us in the intelligence community, very concerned about the nature of these approaches to the Russians," Clapper said during an exclusive interview on NBC's "Meet The Press."

"If you put that in context with everything else we knew the Russians were doing to interfere with the election, and just the historical practices of the Russians, who typically, almost genetically driven to co-opt, penetrate, gain favor, whatever, which is a typical Russian technique. So we were concerned."

Trial psychosis right here. I hope you get the help you so desperately need.

For those that have their fingers permanently crossed that SOMEONE finds SOMETHING that Trump did illegal to result in Hillary's EPIC defeat...

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/20/alan-dershowitz-pulverizes-liberal-anti-trump-russia-theories-and-nearly-leaves-carlson-speechless/

Try to keep upp wrote:

For those that have their fingers permanently crossed that SOMEONE finds SOMETHING that Trump did illegal to result in Hillary's EPIC defeat...

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/20/alan-dershowitz-pulverizes-liberal-anti-trump-russia-theories-and-nearly-leaves-carlson-speechless/

That from the man who told us all how OJ was completely innocent.

What Dershowitz said is meaningless. First, he argues and implies that the president can’t obstruct justice, because of the Unitary Clause. The Unitary Doctrine only says that he has ”control” over the executive branch. How do you stretch the meaning of ”control” to mean that he can obstruct justice by trying to stop an investigation into himself? Many attorneys disagree heartily to that weak argument and it'll get pulverized. Second, he claims to see no crime, but, who cares? No one expects the president to be prosecuted, because of immunity and likely pardons. Impeachment is a remedy that does not necessarily require a violation of a criminal statute.

T is dumber than a bag full of rocks and has a much worse attitude.

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/871702358941736961