Trump's troubles are not behind him by any means:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/08/all-the-legal-trouble-in-trumpworld-scandals-trump/
Trump's troubles are not behind him by any means:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/08/all-the-legal-trouble-in-trumpworld-scandals-trump/
nontrumper wrote:
Trump's troubles are not behind him by any means:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/08/all-the-legal-trouble-in-trumpworld-scandals-trump/
But none of that is collusion so it does t matter.
You can’t impeach a president who’s doing a good in right? Right?
The economy is a couple months away from a serious case of the “Mehs”.
Alan
Hardloper wrote:
CONspiracy wrote:
The word is CONspiracy, you retard.
Stop watching Faux News.
Why watch "Faux" News? It's more fun to watch the depressed anchors on CNN as they try to backtrack from the conspiracy theory they pushed for 2 years
So, you are a closeted liberal.
This has been a very successful investigation, no matter what is in the report.
"He pulled back the curtain on a sophisticated Kremlin hacking operation — identifying by name the 12 Russian military officers who he said sought to sway a U.S. election.
He exposed a Russian online influence campaign — bringing criminal charges against the 13 members of a Russian troll farm now accused of trying to manipulate U.S. voters and sow division through fake social media personae.
And he revealed how those closest to President Trump defrauded banks, cheated on their taxes and, time and time again, lied to deflect inquiries into their ties with Russia.
After 22 months of meticulous investigation, charges against 34 people — including six former Trump aides or confidants — and countless hours of all-consuming news coverage, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III on Friday submitted the long-anticipated report on his findings to Attorney General William P. Barr.
Barr said in a letter to lawmakers that he may be able to inform Congress of Mueller’s “principal conclusions” as early as this weekend."
Flagpole wrote:
Flagpole is in desperation mode! wrote:
When flagpole loses, he calls others froggy. This has happened many times as he's lost over and over. If his middle name isn't insecure, it should be.
The following is true:
Mueller has come and>>>>>gone.
Flagpole, the real clown, is done.
Flags tone has suddenly changed and it can easily be read in his words. Sally Vixen is giving him a brutal lesson on how bad the democrats lie and how to NOT believe everything you read. Flagboy reads it, takes it as gospel, posts it, and brags about it happening. Obama clearly lied many times, but not nearly as bad as Clinton did as a Senator and First Lady, if you can stomach to call her that.
LL is the 2nd biggest loser on this thread. He preaches to not go back in time, yet he and his mentor, Flagboy, do it all the time when it fits their agenda. He talks about Bill's impeachment, but neglects to point out that not one Democrat voted against him. If the Republicans do that, he cries foul. Yeah, he's reeeeeeeeaaaaallllly a bright one (insert major sarcasm).
I'll bet a few dozen people on here have seen pictures of Flagboy as one was posted a few years ago. YUCK!
I'm quite confident that LL is the same. Out of shape, looking for attention and a chubs with no hair. You poor fellas!
Ha!
1) I NEVER go into desperation mode.
2) If I am wrong about some of my predictions, big freakin' deal.
3) As Alan said, you Trumpers are celebrating a tad early here...we haven't seen the report...we haven't seen Barr's summary...we haven't seen the underlying documentation that the House has said they will subpoena if not provided.
4) I will let you guys have your little false celebration for a while, but Trump and his minions are far from out of the woods.
1) TOTAL desperation.
2) it is to you.
king troll, charlie Z, and Flagpole, cut from the same cloth, are they the same person/
have the same versions of their prowess, wins, and 'slight' setbacks.
documentary on flagpole, 143-0 is his record.
Flagpole wrote:
Flagpole is in desperation mode! wrote:
When flagpole loses, he calls others froggy. This has happened many times as he's lost over and over. If his middle name isn't insecure, it should be.
The following is true:
Mueller has come and>>>>>gone.
Flagpole, the real clown, is done.
Flags tone has suddenly changed and it can easily be read in his words. Sally Vixen is giving him a brutal lesson on how bad the democrats lie and how to NOT believe everything you read. Flagboy reads it, takes it as gospel, posts it, and brags about it happening. Obama clearly lied many times, but not nearly as bad as Clinton did as a Senator and First Lady, if you can stomach to call her that.
LL is the 2nd biggest loser on this thread. He preaches to not go back in time, yet he and his mentor, Flagboy, do it all the time when it fits their agenda. He talks about Bill's impeachment, but neglects to point out that not one Democrat voted against him. If the Republicans do that, he cries foul. Yeah, he's reeeeeeeeaaaaallllly a bright one (insert major sarcasm).
I'll bet a few dozen people on here have seen pictures of Flagboy as one was posted a few years ago. YUCK!
I'm quite confident that LL is the same. Out of shape, looking for attention and a chubs with no hair. You poor fellas!
Ha!
1) I NEVER go into desperation mode.
2) If I am wrong about some of my predictions, big freakin' deal.
3) As Alan said, you Trumpers are celebrating a tad early here...we haven't seen the report...we haven't seen Barr's summary...we haven't seen the underlying documentation that the House has said they will subpoena if not provided.
4) I will let you guys have your little false celebration for a while, but Trump and his minions are far from out of the woods.
Don’t fret, brother. You still have the aliens coming down to Earth angle, brother.
Pookie Washington wrote:
Hardloper wrote:
Nope... it's over, brother. No Americans indicted for collusion. This is great news (for everyone), and worthy of celebration. We can wait for more details and then celebrate again though, I'm fine with that
No one was ever going to get indicted for collusion because it's not a crime.....idiot. After all the other indictments and guilty pleas from Trump associates if you still think 45 is not a slimeball and criminal then you are delusional.
What was the point of this investigation if not Russian collusion (or conspiracy, or whatever you want to call it)? We didn't launch a two-year investigation to find out whether Paul Manafort commited mortgage fraud
Hardloper wrote:
Pookie Washington wrote:
No one was ever going to get indicted for collusion because it's not a crime.....idiot. After all the other indictments and guilty pleas from Trump associates if you still think 45 is not a slimeball and criminal then you are delusional.
What was the point of this investigation if not Russian collusion (or conspiracy, or whatever you want to call it)? We didn't launch a two-year investigation to find out whether Paul Manafort commited mortgage fraud
So were you ok with Clinton being impeached over something not at all connected to Whitewater? Just wondering if your position is politically motivated or not.
The current investigation has been more successful than any special counsel in history in terms of indictments and in that it has proven that there was Russian interference, it proved the campaign committed felonies during the campaign (Cohen, hush money). it has shown suspicious and possibly illegal activity between the campaign and Russian or Russia connected associates (Manafort and polling data, Stone and Wikileaks), it has shown the numerous lies made by the campaign on subjects it shouldn’t have a reason to lie about if everything was ethical and legal (Trump Tower Meeting, Trump Moscow Project). But hey F the Dems right? Reagan and HW.Bush would be sickened by the Republican support for this charlatan.
Everything is peaches as long as one side WINS and the other LOSES right?
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:
Hardloper wrote:
What was the point of this investigation if not Russian collusion (or conspiracy, or whatever you want to call it)? We didn't launch a two-year investigation to find out whether Paul Manafort commited mortgage fraud
So were you ok with Clinton being impeached over something not at all connected to Whitewater? Just wondering if your position is politically motivated or not.
The current investigation has been more successful than any special counsel in history in terms of indictments and in that it has proven that there was Russian interference, it proved the campaign committed felonies during the campaign (Cohen, hush money). it has shown suspicious and possibly illegal activity between the campaign and Russian or Russia connected associates (Manafort and polling data, Stone and Wikileaks), it has shown the numerous lies made by the campaign on subjects it shouldn’t have a reason to lie about if everything was ethical and legal (Trump Tower Meeting, Trump Moscow Project). But hey F the Dems right? Reagan and HW.Bush would be sickened by the Republican support for this charlatan.
Everything is peaches as long as one side WINS and the other LOSES right?
Alan
the goal was to find out the extent of russian connections to the trump campaign. It did that.
Put another way:
https://twitter.com/mehdirhasan/status/1109545246877204481Hardloper wrote:
Pookie Washington wrote:
No one was ever going to get indicted for collusion because it's not a crime.....idiot. After all the other indictments and guilty pleas from Trump associates if you still think 45 is not a slimeball and criminal then you are delusional.
What was the point of this investigation if not Russian collusion (or conspiracy, or whatever you want to call it)? We didn't launch a two-year investigation to find out whether Paul Manafort commited mortgage fraud
The point of this investigation was to bring Trump down at all costs. To reverse the 2016 election in which every Liberal was so sure Hillary would win. Once Trump won, those in the FBI and DOJ conspired and engaged in the biggest federal corruption in the history of the United States, with Donald Trump, whom the Liberals despise so much that it borders on derangement, as the victim. McCabe, Rosenstein, Comey, John Brennan (what a scoundrel he is!) and everyone else did everything they could to malign everyone associated with the Trump campaign and the Trump clan in an attempt to bring the Donald to his knees. The one person who had some scruples, as it turns out, was the one person who the Liberals were frothing at the mouth to make sure he was allowed to finish his investigation. Well he finished, and the Liberals are ready to tar and feather the former "The Honorable and highly decorated Robert Mueller." Just a laughable expose on how deranged the Liberals have become. Not all but everyone like Adam Schiff, Schumer, Cummings, and everyone else. It is saying something when Nancy Pelosi is considered the level-headed one of the House Democrats. Shame on you Democrats. I don't mean the Liberals here. But those in the deep state and those in the media.
Runningart2004 wrote:
I think this is all rather hilarious. People already saying the report had nothing it in when the report hasn’t even been released.
People saying Flagpole was wrong when there are like a dozen other investigations going on.
I think Jr and Kushner are still in legal jeopardy with the SDNY. I will be interesting to see the actual report since Jr lied to Congress and he’s not indicted. Is that being wrapped up with other charges in other districts?
The bar for conspiracy was always high and Flagpole has been overplaying his hand with the other charges he thinks will be coming. I just don’t think there will be enough evidence to indict on most of what Flagpole thinks will happen.
What I see:
1. Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator on felony campaign finance violations. That’s a fact they cannot be argued against.
2. Bank fraud as it relates to Deutsche Bank. This is becoming even more clear.
Those two seem pretty cut and dry. Of course that’s not “collusion”.
Stone may be shown to have conspired with Russian intelligence via Wikileaks....but did Trump know? Again no conspiracy directly with Trump. Remember what Guiliani said about members of the campaign conspiring doesn’t mean Trump did. Plausible deniability.
Either way, Trump loses in a landslide of historic proportions in 2020 and loses TX :)
Alan
Flagpole was totally wrong . Because 1) he could not separate liberal media striving to gain ratings through creative story writing and the truth . 2) You are both moving the goal post to 2020 . Liberals are great at giving up .
Sally Vix wrote:
Hardloper wrote:
What was the point of this investigation if not Russian collusion (or conspiracy, or whatever you want to call it)? We didn't launch a two-year investigation to find out whether Paul Manafort commited mortgage fraud
The point of this investigation was to bring Trump down at all costs. To reverse the 2016 election in which every Liberal was so sure Hillary would win. Once Trump won, those in the FBI and DOJ conspired and engaged in the biggest federal corruption in the history of the United States, with Donald Trump, whom the Liberals despise so much that it borders on derangement, as the victim. McCabe, Rosenstein, Comey, John Brennan (what a scoundrel he is!) and everyone else did everything they could to malign everyone associated with the Trump campaign and the Trump clan in an attempt to bring the Donald to his knees. The one person who had some scruples, as it turns out, was the one person who the Liberals were frothing at the mouth to make sure he was allowed to finish his investigation. Well he finished, and the Liberals are ready to tar and feather the former "The Honorable and highly decorated Robert Mueller." Just a laughable expose on how deranged the Liberals have become. Not all but everyone like Adam Schiff, Schumer, Cummings, and everyone else. It is saying something when Nancy Pelosi is considered the level-headed one of the House Democrats. Shame on you Democrats. I don't mean the Liberals here. But those in the deep state and those in the media.
so...you don't want to know about the 37 indictments, including those of trump's personal lawyer, national security advisor and his campaign manager. You didn't want to know what the connections were between Russia and the Trump campaign.
I'm just going to say that is a traitorous, anarchic viewpoint. Completely indefensible.
agip wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
The point of this investigation was to bring Trump down at all costs. To reverse the 2016 election in which every Liberal was so sure Hillary would win. Once Trump won, those in the FBI and DOJ conspired and engaged in the biggest federal corruption in the history of the United States, with Donald Trump, whom the Liberals despise so much that it borders on derangement, as the victim. McCabe, Rosenstein, Comey, John Brennan (what a scoundrel he is!) and everyone else did everything they could to malign everyone associated with the Trump campaign and the Trump clan in an attempt to bring the Donald to his knees. The one person who had some scruples, as it turns out, was the one person who the Liberals were frothing at the mouth to make sure he was allowed to finish his investigation. Well he finished, and the Liberals are ready to tar and feather the former "The Honorable and highly decorated Robert Mueller." Just a laughable expose on how deranged the Liberals have become. Not all but everyone like Adam Schiff, Schumer, Cummings, and everyone else. It is saying something when Nancy Pelosi is considered the level-headed one of the House Democrats. Shame on you Democrats. I don't mean the Liberals here. But those in the deep state and those in the media.
so...you don't want to know about the 37 indictments, including those of trump's personal lawyer, national security advisor and his campaign manager. You didn't want to know what the connections were between Russia and the Trump campaign.
I'm just going to say that is a traitorous, anarchic viewpoint. Completely indefensible.
agip - Paul Manafort committed his crimes prior to being Trump's campaign manager but the mainstream media will forever link refer to him as Trump's campaign manager just to cast a stain on Trump. Flynn lying? What did that have to do with Trump? Michael Cohen? He is the only person EVER to have lied to Congress and Congress later called him to testify in front of them. How many of the 37 indictments included Russians who Trump even never knew about? Again, I respect the sincerity of the convictions here but not of the media and those Dems in Congress. I am not lauding the Repubs in Congress either.
The point was to show Russian interference & fake news, etc. Subsequently USA will retaliate with greater interference. If an unarmed Mathias Rust can penetrate Moscow airspace in a light plane, USA might retaliate by bombing the Internet Research Agency & making Russians believe in fake news that Putin was dead & there was a profitable USA-Russian alliance, as an example.
We need to highlight Russian vulnerability/ lack of air cover, while highlighting our superior technology & deep pockets. Our green/futuristic technology vs Russian fossil fuel reliance.
Our huge buffer zones & long-strike capability vs Russian nearness to EU. Peace is a good deal for everyone, whereas war would wipe them out & disturb the balance of power.
Their technology hub being 100 miles from Finland, while Little Rock is 10,000 miles from Russia; to give one example.
jesseriley wrote:
Their technology hub being 100 miles from Finland, while Little Rock is 10,000 miles from Russia; to give one example.
Jessie - would you like to be my hairdresser?