.
This post was edited 30 seconds after it was posted.
-
00
-
Newname wrote:
I see. These tactics worked for five decades but completely stopped working 2 years ago.
And that's your argument?
Trump has been investigated for many years you idiot. Look it up. And for myriads of crime and fraud.
The indictments only happen when a prosecutor feels he can 100% win a case. It takes time. That doesn’t mean he was innocent of other crimes. When you prosecute a high net worth criminal with a huge backing you are cautious which cases to prosecute.
If you would be honest with yourself for one moment, you would admit that Trump announced his run for Presidency because he was in deep legal sh!t two years ago. He was not in deep legal sh!t because he announced for presidency.
11 -
Teaparty Trevor wrote:
Newname wrote:
I see. These tactics worked for five decades but completely stopped working 2 years ago.
And that's your argument?
Trump has been investigated for many years you idiot. Look it up. And for myriads of crime and fraud.
The indictments only happen when a prosecutor feels he can 100% win a case. It takes time. That doesn’t mean he was innocent of other crimes. When you prosecute a high net worth criminal with a huge backing you are cautious which cases to prosecute.
If you would be honest with yourself for one moment, you would admit that Trump announced his run for Presidency because he was in deep legal sh!t two years ago. He was not in deep legal sh!t because he announced for presidency.
"And for myriads of crime and fraud."
Teaparty Trevor - you might want to look up what "myriad" means. I see it often misused with "a myriad of crimes" but never like you used it. What the heck was that? "and for myriads of crime and fraud." "Myriad means "innumerable." You could have said: "Trump was investigated for myriad instances of crime and fraud." Please never again use myriad like you did. That was painful to read.
12 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Teaparty Trevor wrote:
Trump has been investigated for many years you idiot. Look it up. And for myriads of crime and fraud.
The indictments only happen when a prosecutor feels he can 100% win a case. It takes time. That doesn’t mean he was innocent of other crimes. When you prosecute a high net worth criminal with a huge backing you are cautious which cases to prosecute.
If you would be honest with yourself for one moment, you would admit that Trump announced his run for Presidency because he was in deep legal sh!t two years ago. He was not in deep legal sh!t because he announced for presidency.
"And for myriads of crime and fraud."
Teaparty Trevor - you might want to look up what "myriad" means. I see it often misused with "a myriad of crimes" but never like you used it. What the heck was that? "and for myriads of crime and fraud." "Myriad means "innumerable." You could have said: "Trump was investigated for myriad instances of crime and fraud." Please never again use myriad like you did. That was painful to read.
You are a dumb Azz. the definition of myriad says "a countless OR great number".
Has Trump been involved in a great number of legal wrongdoings? Yes. Can you give us a true count of how many? Likely not, maybe you could but it would take a lot of research.
You are wrong again.
01 -
Tea Party Trevor wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
"And for myriads of crime and fraud."
Teaparty Trevor - you might want to look up what "myriad" means. I see it often misused with "a myriad of crimes" but never like you used it. What the heck was that? "and for myriads of crime and fraud." "Myriad means "innumerable." You could have said: "Trump was investigated for myriad instances of crime and fraud." Please never again use myriad like you did. That was painful to read.
You are a dumb Azz. the definition of myriad says "a countless OR great number".
Has Trump been involved in a great number of legal wrongdoings? Yes. Can you give us a true count of how many? Likely not, maybe you could but it would take a lot of research.
You are wrong again.
1) And for a countless of crime and fraud.
2) And for great number of crime and fraud.
Neither of those are going to fly either.
11 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Tea Party Trevor wrote:
You are a dumb Azz. the definition of myriad says "a countless OR great number".
Has Trump been involved in a great number of legal wrongdoings? Yes. Can you give us a true count of how many? Likely not, maybe you could but it would take a lot of research.
You are wrong again.
1) And for a countless of crime and fraud.
2) And for great number of crime and fraud.
Neither of those are going to fly either.
"... a countless OR great number".
One more thing - ending quotation marks go outside the punctuation. You don't know that? Seriously?
11 -
Tea Party Trevor wrote:
agip wrote:
On the national security issue:
remember that the White House refused to give security clearances to Trump's son in law Kushner. Utterly refused. Trump overruled the WH and forced them to give security clearance to Kushner. We don't know why the professionals refused.
And yeah Kushner cashed in later with a $2bn 'investment' from Saudi as soon as the nepo-baby left the White House. Of course he did.
And then of course trump reveled in revealing and risking US secrets and the secrets of other nations - it was a favorite thing he did multiple times. Would have been fired by any level of US government for any of those.
We may not know why Kushner specifically was denied security clearances. But we do know why many others get denied. And it is financial ties to international mobsters and foreign govt agents that would put them in a compromised position to be easily bribed by having sensitive info that could damage the country. And those are the worse case instances. People are denied for simply fibbing about their foreign ties. (Looking at you Mike Flynn).
This week we learned that when Trump was playing hide and seek from the FBI and NA with his classified documents after being subpoened he also had a top secret closet that was locked and missed by the FBI. This was after the FBI broke the locks of the Storage closet where Walt Nauta changed the locks and then said he did not know where to find the key.
Oh yeah. And remember the last days of the Trump administration? When Trump demanded the classified documents related to the Russia, Russia, Russia investigation be released? He was told no Effing way because our sources in Russia and elsewhere would be made public and killed. Trump was determined to have it all unredacted and out in the public. Hmmm.. Who would benefit from that? Who would pay for that information?
It turns out the originals in a binder were never found. Last seen with Mark Meadows. Who knows if those sources are dead or alive today.
Walt Nauta is a patriot and I greatly resent you saying anything bad about him. NOT ONCE did he bring Donny Coke Zero instead of Diet Coke. NOT ONCE. Imagine that kind of devotion to duty. An incredible public servant, and fortunately, I'm SURE that Donny will stick with him through thick and thin.
00 -
Tea Party Trevor wrote:
this is gonna be a very bad week for Trump. Ketchup will fly in the rat infested wedding resort.
The D.C. Circuit:
"It would be a striking paradox if the President, who alone is vested with the constitutional duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,' were the sole officer capable of defying those laws with impunity.
"We cannot accept former President Trump’s claim that a President has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralize the most fundamental check on executive power — the recognition and implementation of election results. Nor can we sanction his apparent contention that the Executive has carte blanche to violate the rights of individual citizens to vote and to have their votes count."Chef's kiss!
Foreigners: Did you hear that the U.S. apparently NEEDED judges to carefully consider whether or not their president can do ANYTHING that he damn well pleases?
Weird.
Haven't they been telling us FOR GENERATIONS that they're WAY better than that?
00 -
Tea Party Trevor wrote:
agip wrote:
Trump had a chance and broke his oath of office. Nothing more needs to be said. The Republican broke his oath of office when he advised that the Constitution be "terminated" to keep him in power.
The con man couldn't even do the very minimum. A serious country wouldn't entrust this guy with sweeping streets.
"I will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Not under Trump.
This point doesn't get made often enough. If a guy like Trump came to your family gathering and talked like Trump and treated people like Trump 95% of the country would tell him to get the hell out of their house and never be welcomed back. On top of that, if a guy like Trump was hired at any company and acted like Trump and treated people like Trump, he would be fired the first day of employment. Even as a janitor. Much less having any managerial role.
And while I am at it, if a guy like Trump applied for any government job that required any level of security clearance Trump's application would be the first one discarded.
Definitely. And I'll be a douche and point out that I make the "People would never accept a Trump-like person in ANY sphere of their lives" point fairly regularly.
And I don't think that I ever thought about this explicitly before, but that is probably 99.9% true of people judging others at roughly their own socioeconomic level. But it becomes a rock-solid 100% EVERYONE in cases where someone is judging an "elite" who is way, way higher than them on the ladder.
And yet...... "I hate fellow rednecks who act like that. But I DON'T hate a faux billionaire New Yorker who acts like that."
Makes perfect sense.
02 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
1) And for a countless of crime and fraud.
2) And for great number of crime and fraud.
Neither of those are going to fly either.
"... a countless OR great number".
One more thing - ending quotation marks go outside the punctuation. You don't know that? Seriously?
Your posts suggests that you would much prefer to discuss punctuation rather than the history of criminality of Donald Trump. If I supported Donald Trump, I too would prefer to discuss anything other than his long criminal history.
Its completely understandable.
30 -
well this... wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
"... a countless OR great number".
One more thing - ending quotation marks go outside the punctuation. You don't know that? Seriously?
Your posts suggests that you would much prefer to discuss punctuation rather than the history of criminality of Donald Trump. If I supported Donald Trump, I too would prefer to discuss anything other than his long criminal history.
Its completely understandable.
Trump has lived in New York city for decades. Never one single indictment. Not one. Now, there is a surfeit of indictments. Why? Maybe because he could be re-elected and you Dems/Libs are terrified of that happening.
31 -
Sally Vix wrote:
well this... wrote:
Your posts suggests that you would much prefer to discuss punctuation rather than the history of criminality of Donald Trump. If I supported Donald Trump, I too would prefer to discuss anything other than his long criminal history.
Its completely understandable.
Trump has lived in New York city for decades. Never one single indictment. Not one. Now, there is a surfeit of indictments. Why? Maybe because he could be re-elected and you Dems/Libs are terrified of that happening.
You Q nutz have thrown this claim out before and it has been shot down. Tangerine Turd dismissed the NY Southern District DA 1st day in office because of multiple open investigations.
He is a life long conman scumbag........
03 -
Sleepy Joe will drop out of the race.
31 -
LRisfullofLosers wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Trump has lived in New York city for decades. Never one single indictment. Not one. Now, there is a surfeit of indictments. Why? Maybe because he could be re-elected and you Dems/Libs are terrified of that happening.
You Q nutz have thrown this claim out before and it has been shot down. Tangerine Turd dismissed the NY Southern District DA 1st day in office because of multiple open investigations.
He is a life long conman scumbag........
Wrong thread.
21 -
Teaparty Trevor wrote:
Newname wrote:
I see. These tactics worked for five decades but completely stopped working 2 years ago.
And that's your argument?
Trump has been investigated for many years you idiot. Look it up. And for myriads of crime and fraud.
The indictments only happen when a prosecutor feels he can 100% win a case. It takes time. That doesn’t mean he was innocent of other crimes. When you prosecute a high net worth criminal with a huge backing you are cautious which cases to prosecute.
If you would be honest with yourself for one moment, you would admit that Trump announced his run for Presidency because he was in deep legal sh!t two years ago. He was not in deep legal sh!t because he announced for presidency.
Take your TDS to the Trump thread. Thank you.
21 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Sleepy Joe will drop out of the race.
What do the Dems do? They have a huge quandary on their hands. Neal Katyal - an elite scholar is terrified that Trump won't be tried before the election. He is absolutely terrified. What do they do with Biden? He is almost brain-dead. If they get rid of him who do they have left? Kamala Harris? She is a joke. But if they get rid of her all the blacks will be whining and bellyaching. What to do?
31 -
Sleepy Joe is a few sandwiches short of a picnic.
11 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Sleepy Joe will drop out of the race.
What do the Dems do? They have a huge quandary on their hands. Neal Katyal - an elite scholar is terrified that Trump won't be tried before the election. He is absolutely terrified. What do they do with Biden? He is almost brain-dead. If they get rid of him who do they have left? Kamala Harris? She is a joke. But if they get rid of her all the blacks will be whining and bellyaching. What to do?
Commie Newsom.
11 -
Sally Vix wrote:
well this... wrote:
Your posts suggests that you would much prefer to discuss punctuation rather than the history of criminality of Donald Trump. If I supported Donald Trump, I too would prefer to discuss anything other than his long criminal history.
Its completely understandable.
Trump has lived in New York city for decades. Never one single indictment. Not one. Now, there is a surfeit of indictments. Why? Maybe because he could be re-elected and you Dems/Libs are terrified of that happening.
I completely disagree with the first part yet entirely agree with your last statement.
There are so many things from fraud, fake Universities, not paying contractors, stealing from his charity, just as a start but really too many things to list.
However, yes I would be "terrified" of a Trump reelection because I love our country and I love democracy. I know not everyone feels that way and some might actually be disappointed that he wasn't given total immunity for any crimes he committed while in office.
Who else would think of asking for total immunity from prosecution of crimes they have committed. But I am guessing you and many are okay with that, yes?
01 -
Nnonequals wrote:
Tea Party Trevor wrote:
This point doesn't get made often enough. If a guy like Trump came to your family gathering and talked like Trump and treated people like Trump 95% of the country would tell him to get the hell out of their house and never be welcomed back. On top of that, if a guy like Trump was hired at any company and acted like Trump and treated people like Trump, he would be fired the first day of employment. Even as a janitor. Much less having any managerial role.
And while I am at it, if a guy like Trump applied for any government job that required any level of security clearance Trump's application would be the first one discarded.
Definitely. And I'll be a douche and point out that I make the "People would never accept a Trump-like person in ANY sphere of their lives" point fairly regularly.
And I don't think that I ever thought about this explicitly before, but that is probably 99.9% true of people judging others at roughly their own socioeconomic level. But it becomes a rock-solid 100% EVERYONE in cases where someone is judging an "elite" who is way, way higher than them on the ladder.
And yet...... "I hate fellow rednecks who act like that. But I DON'T hate a faux billionaire New Yorker who acts like that."
Makes perfect sense.
Wrong thread.
11
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.