Sally Vix wrote:
MC Flag wrote:
Never gonna happen.
It's been established that Flagpole has ZERO musical talent.
Flagpole, I have never called a woman a b*itch or a whore. You really think that is acceptable?
Only if they are either a b!tch or a whore. These are terms that are earned.
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Disagreeing with you aside, since when did it take "musical" talent to be a rapper?
Umm..... ever heard of Vanilla Ice?
Debatable that he had musical talent, but even going with your assertion that he did, I didn't say you can't have musical talent and be a rapper...only that it is not a requirement.
looking like around 10 R senators will vote against Spanks and try to end the national emergency.
10. That is better than I'd expect from the Rs, but that's the bigotry of low expectations, built up over the last many years.
But good job, 10 R senators who believe in the constitution. You did well.
And there is a 1/5 chance 60 or more senators will vote to kill this thing. That's a lot.
Flagpole wrote:
JaDrool wrote:
INCORRECT!
I KNOW you to be Racket. Yep.
You can not know something that is not true.
CORRECT!
That's how I know. Duh.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole, I have never called a woman a b*itch or a whore. You really think that is acceptable?
Only if they are either a b!tch or a whore. These are terms that are earned.
If your wife "earns" those terms, will you be calling her a b(tch and a whore? Like if she leaves a dirty kitchen? Or forgets to put the toilet seat down?
agip wrote:
looking like around 10 R senators will vote against Spanks and try to end the national emergency.
10. That is better than I'd expect from the Rs, but that's the bigotry of low expectations, built up over the last many years.
But good job, 10 R senators who believe in the constitution. You did well.
And there is a 1/5 chance 60 or more senators will vote to kill this thing. That's a lot.
The president should be prevented from vetoing any policy, or declaration, he initiates. Trump is being allowed to create any bypass of Congress--which has a majority pass requirement to send legislation to his desk--by vetoing anything he likes and forcing it to be a 2/3rds vote to send to him again. Does anyone else see this problem? A ruling of the country by just over 1/3rd of Congress? No more majority rule?
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole, I have never called a woman a b*itch or a whore. You really think that is acceptable?
Only if they are either a b!tch or a whore. These are terms that are earned.
Calling someone a "b!itch" or "whore" is low class.
agip wrote:
looking like around 10 R senators will vote against Spanks and try to end the national emergency.
10. That is better than I'd expect from the Rs, but that's the bigotry of low expectations, built up over the last many years.
But good job, 10 R senators who believe in the constitution. You did well.
And there is a 1/5 chance 60 or more senators will vote to kill this thing. That's a lot.
Those republican Senators voting against the emergency resolution are cowards. There IS an emergency crisis at the border and anyone saying otherwise is an effing idiot. 100,000 illegals are crossing the border EACH month. How can you not call this an emergency crisis?
Flaggy the fun guy wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Only if they are either a b!tch or a whore. These are terms that are earned.
If your wife "earns" those terms, will you be calling her a b(tch and a whore?
The Lovely Mrs. Flagpole is not capable of earning those terms.
Ughh wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Only if they are either a b!tch or a whore. These are terms that are earned.
Calling someone a "b!itch" or "whore" is low class.
Disagree. BEING a b!tch or a whore is low class.
JaDrool wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
You can not know something that is not true.
CORRECT!
That's how I know. Duh.
The problem with Beto might be his recent loss to Ted Cruz. It would just depend on how his opponents play it and how he plays it. Many political losers have gone on to win the presidency, Reagan both Bushes etc. To his credit he got closer than anyone would’ve thought a Democrat could have and was even I believe 5% or more closer than the most recent polling.
Biden is too old, but so is Trump. The VP choice really doesn’t matter if it’s Beto though. If it’s Biden it matters because he’s old as dirt. And I don’t think you need a super progressive on the ticket, because those are going to come out anyway just to get Trump out of office. It’s not like 2016 when many Progressives were upset and just stayed home instead of voting for Clinton because They didn’t really think Trump had a chance anyway.
Alan
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
looking like around 10 R senators will vote against Spanks and try to end the national emergency.
10. That is better than I'd expect from the Rs, but that's the bigotry of low expectations, built up over the last many years.
But good job, 10 R senators who believe in the constitution. You did well.
And there is a 1/5 chance 60 or more senators will vote to kill this thing. That's a lot.
Those republican Senators voting against the emergency resolution are cowards. There IS an emergency crisis at the border and anyone saying otherwise is an effing idiot. 100,000 illegals are crossing the border EACH month. How can you not call this an emergency crisis?
Maybe you should ask Trump. He admitted it wasn't an emergency.
Flagpole wrote:
Ughh wrote:
Calling someone a "b!itch" or "whore" is low class.
Disagree. BEING a b!tch or a whore is low class.
If we think your wife or daughter is BEING a b%tch or a whore we are allowed to call them that?
Partisan Hack wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Graham is over at the WH today to break it to Trump that he is in for a rude awakening on the emergency bill. There are going to be something like 15-20 republicans voting with the Dems. Good thing Trump has McD’s on speed dial, he’s going to need it.
Again, I like to see politicians not toeing the party line on every single vote. People nowadays are shocked when someone votes outside the majority of their party. Whatever happened to voting your conscience. It's a good thing.
That is less and less part of the equation. A lot of voters are thinking about what the other side will default to and will do the same. This happened in 2016, with many who wanted Bernie feeling like they had to vote for HRC for the Dems to win. IMO those who liked Bernie and went with their conscience and stayed home instead of voting for HRC cost the Dems the election. Not saying it’s the voters’ fault but am pointing that these strategies have massive consequences.
Douglas Burk wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Disagree. BEING a b!tch or a whore is low class.
If we think your wife or daughter is BEING a b%tch or a whore we are allowed to call them that?
"If we"????? Please learn to write. Speak for yourself. "If I" meaning you and not the rest of us.
Racket wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
A Biden/Beto ticket would be davasting for Trump.
Misspelling aside, I think you underestimate how hard it is to beat an incumbent president.
No I am not. Trump will have a lot more money and almost full support of his party, but the reality is turnout is always poor for re elections, with this time being a huge exception IMO. Liberals are really fired up, and do you honestly think Trump will be able to boost his vote count from last time?
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Those republican Senators voting against the emergency resolution are cowards. There IS an emergency crisis at the border and anyone saying otherwise is an effing idiot. 100,000 illegals are crossing the border EACH month. How can you not call this an emergency crisis?
Maybe you should ask Trump. He admitted it wasn't an emergency.
Doesn't matter what he said. Do YOU not agree that it is an emergency???
Sally Vix wrote:
Doesn't matter what he said. Do YOU not agree that it is an emergency???
This who believe there is a real emergency are a small minority of the American people. Real Americans outnumber the believers by nearly 2:1.
THOSE ....
Otherwise, Sally will go all grammar nazi.
You are in the minority wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Doesn't matter what he said. Do YOU not agree that it is an emergency???
This who believe there is a real emergency are a small minority of the American people. Real Americans outnumber the believers by nearly 2:1.
What the eff does that mean? Am asking YOU! If we have one million illegals enter our country in one year - is that NOT an emergency?